What is the priority? Reducing “at risk” behaviors
Download
Report
Transcript What is the priority? Reducing “at risk” behaviors
Patient Safety,
Medication Errors, and
“At-risk” Behaviors
Christine M. Wilson
Advanced Concepts of Pharmacology
Viterbo University
Something to Think About
Patient
Safety
should not
be a priority
in
healthcare.
Medication Error
Any preventable event that may
cause or lead to inappropriate
medication use or patient harm,
while the medication is in the
control of the healthcare
professional, patient, or
consumer
NCC MERP, as cited in Lehne, 2004
Medication Errors Impact
Patient Safety
Missed doses
Wrong time of administration
I.V. rate too fast
Wrong concentration or dose
delivered I.V.
Wrong route of administration
Missed or mistaken provider orders
Nursing Actions Impact
Patient Safety
Mis-identification of patient; wrong
medication delivered
Documentation of medications before
giving to patient
No documentation of changing patient
conditions
Lack of attentiveness
Inappropriate judgment
Remember When ?
Novice nurse behaviors and actions
Nervous and careful with medication
administration
Provides undivided attention to task
Prepares one medication at a time
Seeks information about unfamiliar meds
Checks patient allergies, weight, lab values
Has another double check medications
Provides education to patient about meds
After Gaining Experience ?
Expert nurse behaviors and actions
Prepares IV mixtures, not waiting for pharmacy
to prepare
Administers medications before pharmacy
reviews orders
“Borrows” another patient’s meds, to allow quick
administration
Does not label self-prepared syringes of meds
May not take med record to bedside for prns
Has unauthorized med “stashes” on unit
At-risk Behaviors
Intentional and unsafe practice
habits, learned through experience
Healthcare providers, insurers,
pharmaceutical industry, medical device
vendors
Engage in at-risk behavior because
rewards are often more immediate and
positive than the potential for patient
harm
ISMP Medication Safety Alert, 2004
Sources for At-Risk Behaviors
System-based
Unnecessary process complexity
Patient medication in multiple storage areas
Nurse may move meds to more readily
accessible area
Problems with technology
Repeated waiting for computer terminal
access
Physician may resort to verbal orders when
prescribing
Pharmacist may skip checking lab values
Sources for At-Risk Behaviors
Organizational culture with high tolerance
for at-risk behaviors
Staff believes more positive rewards than
negative rewards for at-risk behavior
“Saves” time now; chance of patient harm
viewed as remote and unlikely
Staff believes more negative rewards than
positive rewards for corresponding safe behavior
Labeled as “slow employee”, rather than
“efficient”
Areas Involving Potential
At-risk Behaviors
Patient information
Drug information
Communication
Labeling,
packaging
Drug stock,
storage,
distribution
Patient education
Staff education
Technology
Environment/
staffing patterns
Quality/culture
Double checks
Teamwork
Environment/Staffing
More concern with cost
of medication units,
rather than safety
Managing multiple
priorities while
carrying out complex
processes
Failure to adequately
supervise/orient staff
Inadequate staffing
based on patient
acuity
Quality/Culture
Sacrificing safety for
timeliness
Failure to report and
share med error
information
Organizational culture
inspires secrecy
instead of openness
Finger-pointing rather
than system change
Double Check/Teamwork
Failure to perform
independent double
check thoroughly
Failure to ask
colleague to double
check medication
Reluctance to consult
colleagues for help
Unresponsive to
colleague’s request
Consider . . .
Should patient safety be a priority in
healthcare?
“Priority” implies an order in a list that
can be altered according to
circumstances
Could this “order” be based on:
Demands of the shift or day?
Focus of expedience, productivity,
efficiency, or cost effectiveness?
Case Example
You have had a busy shift and it is now
1400; a new admission has been
assigned to you and the patient will
arrive soon. Due to family obligations,
you must leave the unit at exactly
1500. The 1400 IV medication for one
of your other patients is “missing”, so
you call the pharmacy.
Discussion
Under these circumstances, how would
you react to:
Pharmacist takes time to fully investigate
where the missing medication is located
Pharmacist immediately mixes another
dose and sends it to you
Priorities?
Which action offers more positive
reinforcement?
Case Example
It is 0800 and you are engaged in a
hectic patient assignment. The
physician is writing orders to transfer
one of your patients to another nursing
unit. The hospital policy states that
medication administration records will
be reviewed by the physician during the
transfer process to avoid unintentional
discontinuation of medications.
Discussion
Under these circumstances, how would
you react if:
You are using the medication
administration record when the physician
wants it
The physician elects to not check the
medication administration record prior to
writing orders
Priorities?
Which action offers more positive
reinforcement?
Patient Safety as a Value
Link uncompromised patient safety to
every healthcare activity
Emphasize specific behaviors which
contribute to patient safety
When at-risk behaviors identified:
Do not use disciplinary actions
Do uncover reasons for using them
Conscious risk-taking not involved in all
medication errors; prompt for answers
References
Institute for Safe Medication Practices. (2004, October
7). ISMP medication safety alert! Retrieved April 17,
2005, from
http://www.ismp.org/PDF/At_Risk_behaviors.pdf
Institute for Safe Medication Practices. (2004, October
7). Reducing "at-risk” behaviors. Retrieved April 17,
2005, from
http://www.ismp.org/MSAarticles/ReducingPrint.htm
Institute for Safe Medication Practices. (2004,
September 23). Why we engage in "at-risk
behaviors". Retrieved April 17, 2005, from
http://www.ismp.org/MSAarticles/PatientPrint.htm
Lehne, R. A. (2004). Adverse drug reactions and
medication errors. Pharmacology for Nursing Care
(5th ed., pp. 62-71). St. Louis, MO: Saunders.