Transcript Writing Sociology Essays

Using the following PowerPoint as an aid I would like you to have a go at answering
the following essay;
Read Item B below and answer the following question.
Item B
Feminist approaches to the family tend to emphasize the harmful
effects of family life upon women. They provide a healthy
antidote to Functionalist and New Right accounts, which stress
the functional and beneficial side of family life; downplaying the
way families may have negative consequences for the lives and
opportunities of women.
Applying material from Item B and your knowledge, evaluate the contribution of
Feminist views to our understanding of family.
You have until 5/11/2015 to complete this work, please e-mail me if you need any
extra information.
Please do this as a last resort not a first, thank you.
Sociology Writing
Techniques
•
The examples here refer to essays or answers to
longer structured questions.
•
The Lecture presents some introductory rules
about writing sociologically. It is not presented as
a complete guide to writing essays, or to the skill
domains by which work is assessed.
•
This slideshow is about skills. There is no printed
summary or specific test.
Rules for good writing
1.
2.
3.
4.
•
Answers should reflect the title of the question.
All terms should be explained in some form.
Avoid generalisations – be precise in what you
say.
Think about evidence - what proof have you
that what you say is true?
The examples which follow illustrate some of
these rules in action.
Starting an answer 1
1. The opening paragraph for an essay should be
precise. It should explain terms or outline an
argument.
2. Look at the first paragraph to the essay which
follows.
Marriage is naturally thought of as a
partnership of equals these days. A lot of men
now do much more housework and childcare
than they used to in olden times.
Marriage is naturally
thought of as a partnership
of equals these days. A lot
of men now do much more
housework and childcare
than they used to in olden
times.
By whom? Who
‘naturally thinks’?
When was this?
What men? Who are
you talking about?
Things to improve
Rule 4
Use evidence
Starting an answer 2
Non-participant observation is the
research method that the researcher
chooses if he wants an objective view of a
social issue. He does not join in but
simply put, he just observes.
Non-participant observation is when the
research method that the researcher
chooses if he wants an objective view of a
social issue. He does not join in but
simply put, he just observes.
Are all researchers male?
Think about language here.
Issues to address
Rule 3
Be precise
Starting an answer 3
Personal documents are also known as
expressive documents because they tend to be
things like diaries, and letters and other personal
documents in which you tend to express your
feelings about yourself, other people and issues.
Personal documents give us an insight into how
people think, their desires and ambitions.
Personal documents are also known as
expressive documents because they tend to be
things like diaries, and letters and other personal
documents in which you tend to express your
feelings about yourself, other people and issues.
Personal documents give us an insight into how
people think, their desires and ambitions.
Good! Knowledge is displayed here.
A word is explained and examples
are offered. It is clear the direction
the answer will take
Rule 2
Explain terms
Skill Domains
•
AQA, OCR and WJEC all expect students to
show that they can use the following skills:
1. Knowledge and Understanding
2. Interpretation and Analysis
3. Evaluation
In longer answers you need to show evidence of all of
the skill domains in your answers.
In shorter answers there is less stress on evaluation.
The examples which follow focus mainly on showing
Knowledge and Understanding.
Showing Knowledge and
Understanding
1.
Step one – Know sociological terms precisely.
Keep a list. Use this, your notes and your
textbook.
2.
Step two- Review your work regularly so that
the key points you have studied are absorbed
into your long-term memory.
3.
Step three – Use terms and your knowledge
when writing. Be precise. Show what you
know.
Inaccurate Knowledge
Karl Marx said that religion is a cause for conflict
and it will die out. He also said that religion
legitimises things that would otherwise be
unacceptable. For example racism. In the Old
Testament, God said it is OK to hate Jewish people
and that all Christians should kill Jews on
Judgement Day. This is legitimising racism.
You do not lose marks directly for points which are factually
inaccurate, but obviously you don’t gain any either.
Karl Marx said that religion is a cause for conflict and it will
die out. He also said that religion legitimises things that would
otherwise be unacceptable. For example racism. In the Old
Testament, God said it is OK to hate Jewish people and that
all Christians should kill Jews on Judgement Day. This is
legitimising racism.
This is not so. The cause of
social conflict is economic
inequality, according to Marx.
Religion is used by people as
a way of coping with their lot
in life.
There were no
Christians in the Old
Testament. Jesus was
not born till the New
Testament.
These statements are completely
inaccurate. This will not gain
Knowledge marks
Here’s another bit of knowledge…
Modern sociologists are optimistic about egalitarian
relationship in conjugal role. The famous
sociologists of the family, Willmott and Young, have
written several books on the progression of time.
•
The general idea is sound here, but there are
some serious issues to be raised with this
particular account too. What can you spot?
•
There are two sorts of problems.
Modern sociologists are optimistic about
egalitarian relationships in conjugal roles. The
famous sociologists of the family, Willmott and
Young, have written several books on the
progression of time.
•
Who? Be
precise
here.
•
Excellent use
of term
Some of these
statements are vague.
They do not show what
you know.
Mistakes in English –
this loses marks
The writer knows what this
sentence means – but what
does it say? Read it. Wilmott
and Young wrote about how
families have changed, not time
This is well written …
A recent example in which diaries have been used
as a form of recording information would be that of
Eileen Barker and ‘the Moonies’. She wrote how she
felt and how people around her were – this was
useful because it was the feelings of the people who
were there at the time.
Marks for Interpretation and Analysis include
providing evidence from research. This is done
well here.
There is more good writing
here:
The hidden curriculum is associated
with Pierre Bourdieu and it is all
those things that pupils are taught in
school without realising it.
named
writer
Sociological
term
clear
explanation
of term
Unlike this …
However put, roles in the family can never be
equal. It is biologically impossible. Feminists see
the maternal role as the oppression of women by
men, but surely this is not the case. Biologists
would say that a stronger link is almost always
created between the mother and the child.
Therefore the most natural way of scientific
reasoning would be to say that the female would be
suited more to looking after a child in the early
stages of its life as men do not have the biological
make-up to have a baby.
This is biology and not sociology.
It is presented without evidence.
The same issue, but…
Feminists such as Zaretsky would say that women’s
roles in the family should be equal but they are not.
Evelyn Gillian’s evidence in Item B shows that
98.9% of violent attacks are by men on women. This
is a far cry from equality in the home.
1. Same issue as before, but look at the deployment of
evidence – now we have some sociology to support
the viewpoints.
2. This paragraph refers to feminists, explains what they
say, and includes reference to an Item in the question.
Conclusions in essays
There are three conclusions for most issues:
1. Yes, you agree with the point made in the
question and you can give reasons and
evidence.
2. No, you do not agree and you can give
reasons and evidence.
3. Both sides of the argument are valid and
you will consider them both with reference to
reasons and evidence.
Think ahead to the exam …
1.
2.
3.
4.
Prepare answers to obvious questions in
advance.
Practise plans and ask your teacher or lecturer
to check them.
Read sample essays in books (not to copy, but
to understand how the answer is structured).
Make notes to go with those from classes to
make sure you are aware of debates.
Summary of main issues
1. Answer the question which is asked of you.
2. Refer to sociological knowledge to display your
knowledge and understanding.
3. Use sociological evidence and writers to support
your answers (interpretation and analysis).
4. Check your spelling and grammar. Marks for
Quality of Language are included in those for
Knowledge and Understanding.
5. Remember to read through your work when you
have finished to see that it “flows.”
The end