RISK - WordPress.com

Download Report

Transcript RISK - WordPress.com

After every accident
QUESTIONS
TO BE
ANSWERED






WHO?
WHAT?
WHY?
WHEN?
WHERE?
HOW?
WHO
 Who could be injured?
 Who controls that particular work
environment?
 Who can render first aid or medical
treatment?
WHAT






What is the past accident history of the area?
What is the exact nature of previous injuries?
What do the employees routinely do?
What operations are performed?
What hazardous/nonhazardous materials are used?
What safe-work procedures have been provided?
WHAT








What personal protective equipment are used?
What PPE is required?
What elements can contribute to an accident?
What machine guards are available but not used?
What negative environmental conditions exist?
What related safety procedures need revision?
What shifts do the employee’s work?
What ergonomic factors are involved?
WHEN




When do accidents historically occur?
When do employee start his/her shifts?
When was job-specific training received?
When (how often) do supervisors visit the job?
WHY




Why do the accidents occur?
Why do employee’s do what they do?
Why do co-workers do what they do?
Why are the specific tool/equipment
selected?
WHERE




Where do accident’s occur?
Where are employee’s positioned?
Where is the supervisor stationed?
Where is first aid stationed?
HOW





How do accidents occur?
How many employee’s work in specific areas?
How do employee’s get injured (specifically)?
How can the injuries be avoided?
How can witnesses help better?
HOW CAN
THE COMPANY
IMPROVE
SAFETY ?
Answer is :by adopting
Risk Management
Risk Management study
Recommended by :9th Conference on Safety in mines
New Delhi 2nd & 3rd Feb. 2000.
DGMS (Tech) (S&T) Circular No.13 of 2002
Dt 31.12.2002
Why Risk Management
is Needed ?
1. Accident in Indian Mines are not in reducing trend since a long
period ( Say last 20 Yrs approx.)
2. Statutory provisions can never be fully comprehensive,
appropriate and site specific.
3. Process of Legislation Making, is often slow, these often trail
behind the technological innovations.
4. To make, the statutory provisions, ‘Flexible’ by switching
over from the regime of ‘Prescriptive Regulation ’ to ‘Self
Regulatory’ or ‘Goal Setting Legislation’.
Risk Management
Risk Management
is the process
to eliminate / reduce
Hazards
that may take place
to an
acceptable / desired level.
• Hazard : Source of potential harm,
injury or loss.
• Risk : Combination of the likelihood
of a specific unwanted event and the
potential consequences if it should
occur.
Hazard
A live tiger is always a hazard.
 A live tiger has the potential to cause you
harm and is, therefore, always a hazard.

RISK
• Tiger is always a hazard
• Loose tiger is a risk
• Risk is measured in
terms of Chance & Effect
Severity (Consequence)
Likelihood ( Chance )
Is it possible for all ?
Risk
The Chance of something happening that will
an impact on objectives.
It is measured in consequences and
likelihood.
Risk
= Consequence
X Exposure
X
Probability
Consequence
It is the outcome of an event or situation.
In terms of health and safety, it is the
degree of harm that could be caused to
people exposed to the hazards
Risk
= Consequence
X Exposure
X
Probability
Scale for consequence
Risk
=
Several dead
5
One dead
1
Significant chance of fatality
0.3
One permanent Disability / Less chance of
fatality
0.1
Many Lost time injuries
0.01
One lost time injury
0.001
Small Injury
0.0001
Consequence
X
Exposure
X
Probability
Exposure
Exposure consists of two factors :
1. How often people are exposed to the hazards.
2. How long are they exposed to the hazards.
Scale for Exposure
Continuous
Risk
=
10
Frequent (Daily)
5
Seldom (Weekly)
3
Unusual (Monthly)
2.5
Occasional (Yearly)
2
Once in 5 yrs
1.5
Once in 10 yrs.
0.5
Once in 100 yrs.
0.02
Consequence
X
Exposure
X
Probability
Probability
This is the chance that any person will be harmed when they are
exposed.
Scale for Probability
May well be expected
Risk
=
10.0
Quite possible
7.0
Unusual but possible
3.0
Only remotely possible
2.0
Conceivable but unlikely
1.0
Practically impossible
0.5
Virtually impossible
0.1
Consequence
X
Exposure
X
Probability
RISK MANAGEMENT PROCESS
Assablance of persons
who are oftenly
exposed to risk
Identification of
Probable Risk /
Hazards
Evaluation of Risks
Continuous Process
Partially
Implemented
Ranking of Risks
Implementation of Risk
Management Plan
Fully Implemented
Preparation of Risk
Management Plan
Define Environment
& Assets
The
Process
Design &
Implementation
RISK MANAGEMENT PROCESS
RISK MANAGEMENT PROCESS
 Know current and historical internal environment.
 Know current and historical external environment.
 Understand dependencies and vulnerabilities.
 Understand threat profiles.
 Understand countermeasure choices and related
costs.
 Be able to apply cost-benefit analysis to risks and
countermeasures.
Identification of Hazards
On the basis of
A.
B.
C.
D.
Past accident statistics.
Past incidences.
Work Process Evaluation
Consultation with employees who may have
experience in the job.
E. Off-site specialist with experience at other
mine-sites.
Identification of Hazards
On the basis of
A.
B.
C.
D.
Past accident statistics.
Past incidences.
Work Process Evaluation
Consultation with employees who may have
experience in the job.
E. Off-site specialist with experience at other
mine-sites.
Identification of Hazards
On the basis of
A.
B.
C.
D.
Past accident statistics.
Past incidences.
Work Process Evaluation
Consultation with employees who may have
experience in the job.
E. Off-site specialist with experience at other
mine-sites.
Identification of Hazards
On the basis of
A.
B.
C.
D.
Past accident statistics.
Past incidences.
Work Process Evaluation
Consultation with employees who may have
experience in the job.
E. Off-site specialist with experience at other
mine-sites.
Identification of Hazards
On the basis of
A.
B.
C.
D.
Past accident statistics.
Past incidences.
Work Process Evaluation
Consultation with employees who may have
experience in the job.
E. Off-site specialist with experience at other
mine-sites.









Improper Height & Width of Benches
Haul Road
Slope Stability of Overburden
Moving Machinery
Inadequate Illumination
Working over developed Pillars
Electricity
Respirable Dust & Noise
Unauthorized Entry to Mine Working








Improper Traveling Roadway
Slippery Roadway
Material Handling
Indiscipline / Sabotage / Security
Electrical Storms
Blasting & Use of Explosives
Fall from height
Inadequate supply of spare parts
Hazard Identification for UG Mines








Improper Strata Control
Inundation
Spontaneous combustion
Inflammable Gas & Coal Dust Explosion
Poor supervision
Shortage of skilled persons / deployment of
unskilled persons
Poor quality of supplied material
Improper surveying
Hazard Identification for UG Mines









Inadequate communication system
Explosive / blasting
Haulage
Machinery
Use of un-calibrated instrument
Ventilation not to plan
Lack of awareness
Inadequate supply of spare parts
Geological disturbances
Risk Assessment
An Example
Identified Hazards of a u/g Mine
1) Improper Strata Control
2) Fall of persons
3) Machinery
4) Material Supply
5) Geological Disturbances
6) Inundation
7) Explosive and Blasting
8) Haulage
9) Poor Supervision
10)Sealed Off Panel
11)Other fires.
Risk Assessment
Identifying Mechanism contributing Principal Hazards are as follows :
No
Major Hazards
Mechanism
1
Improper Strata
Control
Failure to identify Bad Roof
0.1
3
1.5
0.45
Improper Dressing
0.3
7
5
10.5
Improper Supervision
0.01
3
2
0.06
Poor workmanship
0.01
2
2
0.04
Inadequate Support Design
0.01
1
2
0.02
Poor Quality of Support Material
0.01
1
1.5
0.01
Cons.
Prob.
Expo.
Risk
2
Fall of Persons
Fall in Same Level
0.1
3
7
2.1
3
Machinery
Temporary Cable Joints
0.3
2
2
1.2
0.001
0.5
1.5
0.001
Marching of SDLs
0.1
2
2
0.4
Unskilled Operators
0.3
1
1.5
0.45
Moving Parts of Machines
0.1
2
2.5
0.5
Maintenance Schedule Not
Followed
4
Material Supply
Extremity caught between two
objects
0.01
3
2
0.06
5
Explosive and
Blasting
Not taking proper shelter
0.01
2
1.5
0.03
Risk Assessment
Identifying Mechanism contributing Principal Hazards are as follows :
No
6
Major Hazards
Haulage
Mechanism
1.5
0.02
Safety devices provided but not Used
0.01
1
1.5
0.02
0.1
1
0.5
0.05
0.01
2
2
0.04
0.001
2
2
0.004
Not having proper knowledge of
recent technology
0.0001
2
1.5
0.006
Inadequate Training
0.0001
2
1.5
0.006
Improper Management of
Subsidence Area
0.001
3
2
0.006
Poor Construction / Maintenance of
Stopping
0.001
2
1.5
0.003
Improper Supervision
0.001
1
3
0.003
Improper Sampling and analysis
procedure
0.001
1
2
0.002
Conveyor Fire
0.001
2
1.5
0.003
Electrical Fire
0.001
1
0.5
0.001
8
Inundation
Inrush of water through subsidence
and cracks
9
Poor Supervision
Negligence / lack of Commitment
Other Fires
Risk
1
Presence of fault plane and slip
planes
11
Expo.
0.01
Geological
Disturbances
Sealed Off Panels
Prob.
Safety device not adequate
7
10
Cons.
Risk Ranking
Head
Mechanism
Risk
Rating
Improper Strata Control
Improper Dressing
10.5
1
Fall of Persons
Fall in Same Level
2.1
2
Machinery
Temporary Cable Joints
1.2
3
Machinery
Moving Parts of Machines
0.5
4
Improper Strata Control
Failure to identify Bad Roof
0.45
5
Machinery
Unskilled Operators
0.45
5
Machinery
Marching of SDLs
0.4
6
Improper Strata Control
Improper Supervision
0.06
7
Haulage
Extremity caught between two
objects
0.06
7
Geological Disturbances
Presence of fault plane and slip
planes
0.05
8
Improper Strata Control
Poor workmanship
0.04
9
Inundation
Inrush of water through subsidence
and cracks
0.04
9
Explosive and Blasting
Not taking proper shelter
0.03
10
Risk
Management
Plan
Top Three identified hazards selected on the basis of Risk
Ranking for Formulating Risk Management Plan initially.
Control Measures Suggested by Risk Management Team
Mechanism
Control Measures
Rating
Improper
Dressing
1
i. Inspection and dressing of blasting zone before and after every round of blasting –
Shri Md Ishaque Mining Sirdar
ii. Authorisation and experienced dressers to be deployed.-Shri Jagannath, Dresser
iii. Intensified training of work to dresser at work site by Safety Officer –
Shri
A.K.Nandi SAM
iv. Proper tools to be used by dresser – Shri Bharat Timber / hel.
v. Eliminate excessive dressing work by maintaining proper blasting pattern – Shri
Rooplal Expl.Carrier
vi. Special courses to be conducted at small intervals for dresser Shri
R.K.Tripathi,Safety Officer
Fall of persons in
Same Level
2
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
Ensure obstruction free roadways – Shri S.Kale , Vent.Officer.
Cleaning of Roadways- Shri Bhimrao, Chain Opr.
Drainage in Traveling Roadway- Shri S.Pawar Foreman (E)
Step Making at Gradient – Shri R.B.Ram Sr.O/M
Temporary Cable
Joints
3
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
Spare Cables made Available – Shri Puran Pradhan,SDL Opr
Don’t use temp.joint Cable – Shri L.N.Bhayare, Colliery Engg.
Training of Operators and Cable men – Shri Vinod Kumar E/Fitter
Effective Joint Cable to be ensured – Shri S.Pawar Foreman (E)
Proper Cable Handling with Protective equipments. Shri Chhattan, Driller
Implementation of Risk Management Plan
Role & Responsibility for each cadre has been fixed for implementation of Risk Management
Plan up to Grass root Level and it is decided after 2 months this will be reviewed.
Control Measures
Responsibility
i. Inspection and dressing of blasting zone before and after every round
of blasting – Shri Md Ishaque Mining Sirdar
ii. Authorisation and experienced dressers to be deployed.Shri
Jagannath, Dresser
iii. Intensifeid training of workk to dresser at work site by Safety Officer
– Shri A.K.Nandi SAM
iv. Proper tools to be used by dresser – Shri Bharat Timber / hel.
v. Eleminate excessive dressing work be maintaining proper blasting
pattern – Shri Rooplal Expl.Carrier
vi. Special courses to be conducted as small intervals for dresser –
Shri R.K.Tripathi,Safety Officer
Concerned Dresser
Mining Sidar Overman
Safety Officer
Manager
VTO
Mechan
ism
Improper
Dressing
Fall of
persons in
Same Level
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
Ensure obstruction free roadways – Shri S.Kale , Vent.Officer.
Cleaning of Roadways- Shri Bhimrao, Chain Opr.
Drainage in Traveling Roadway- Shri S.Pawar Foreman (E)
Step Making at Gradient – Shri R.B.Ram Sr.O/M
Distt Overman
Safety Officer
Temporary
Cable
Joints
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
Spare Cables made Available – Shri Puran Pradhan,SDL Opr
Don’t use temp.joint Cable – Shri L.N.Bhayare, Colliery Engg.
Training of Operators and Cablemen – Shri Vinod Kumar E/Fitter
Effective Joint Cable to be ensured – Shri S.Pawar Foreman (E)
Proper Cable Handling with Protective equipments. Shri Chhattan,
Driller
Colliery Engineer
Electrical Foreman
Review of Implementation of Risk Management Plan
After the review it has been observed that risk is considerably reduced
S.N
Before Implementation of
Risk Management Plan
Hazards
After Implementation of
Risk Management Plan
Cons.
Prob.
Expo.
Risk
Score
Cons.
Prob.
Expo.
Risk
Score
1.
Improper
Dressing
0.3
7
5
10.5
0.1
7
5
3.5
2.
Fall of Person
0.1
3
7
2.1
0.1
2
5
1.0
3.
Temporary
Cable Joint
2
2
2
1.2
0.3
1
1.5
0.45
Safety
WHAT'S NEXT
AFTER RISK ANALYSIS ?







Instruct employee in proper behaviors.
Warn employee of potential hazards.
Supply appropriate safeguards.
Supply appropriate PPE.
Eliminate known unsafe conditions.
Repair or modify known unsafe conditions.
Implement procedural changes.
&
Start
is
Beginning
Nitin Saxena