Transcript BioSem
Service-enabling Biomedical
Research Enterprise
Chapter 5
B. Ramamurthy
Page 1
4/12/2016
Introduction
• Life sciences have witnessed a flurry of
innovations triggered by sequencing of
human genome as well as genomes of
other genomes.
• Area of transformational medicine aims
to improve communication between
basic and clinical science to allow more
therapeutic and diagnostic insights.
Page 2
4/12/2016
Translational medicine
• From bench to bedside
• Exchange ideas, information and knowledge
across organizational, governance, sociocultural, political and national boundaries.
• Currently mediated by the internet and
exponentially-increasing resources
• Digital resources: scientific literature,
experimental data, curated annotation
(metadata) human and machine generated.
Ex: Blast Searches NCBI taxonomy
Page 3
4/12/2016
Driving principles
•
•
Key requirements: large volume of data to be managed. How?
Transform to
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Digital
Machine readable
Capable of being filtered
Aggregated
Transformed automatically
Context information: use and meaning along with content
Knowledge integration: combines data from research in mouse
genetics, cell bilogy, animal neuropsychology, protein biology,
neuropathology, and other areas.
– Attention to drug discovery, systems bilogy and personalized
medicine that rely heavily on integrating and interpreting data
produced by experiments.
– Heterogenious data
Page 4
4/12/2016
BioSem Enterprise Architecture
search
Transform results
Ex: integrate,
generate metadata
Dissemination
Of results
Clinical experiments
Ex: drug discovery
Diagnostic tools
Research
Knowledge
Ex: Blast
Clinical data
Ex: JNI
Academic
Knowledge
Ex: cell,
psychology
molecular
Page 5
ontology
Treatment
methods
4/12/2016
Use case
• Parkinson’s disease (PD):
– System physiology perspective
– Cellular and molecular biology perspective
– Pharmacology relating to chemical compounds
that bind to receptors
– Example query: show me the neuronal components that bind
to a ligand which is a therapeutic agent in Parkinson’s disease in
reach of the dopaminergic neurons in the substania nigra.
– Domain specific shared semantics and
classifications
– Ontologies can help map among the domains and
support seamless integration and interoperation.
Page 6
4/12/2016
Development of Ontologies
• Manual interaction between ontologists
in experts
• Textual descriptions are used for adding
to this base
• Link pre-existing ontologies for
extensive coverage
Page 7
4/12/2016
Ontology design and creation
Approach (fig. 5.1)
Subject matter
Knowledge (Text)
Identify core terms
And phrases
Map phrases to
Relationship between
classes
Model terms using ontological
Constructs: classes, properties
Arrange classes and relationships
in subsumption hierarchies
Information
queries
Pre-existing classifications
And ontologies
Page 8
Identify new classes and
relationships
Re-use classes and
relationships
Refine subsumption
hierarchies
Extenf subsumption
hierarchies
4/12/2016
Identifying concepts and
hierarchies
• Text describing PD in p.105
• Study the analysis
• Based on the analysis identify important ontological
concepts relevant to PD:
–
–
–
–
Genes
Proteins
Genetic mutations
Diseases
• See fig. 5.2
• Next step is to identify relationship among concepts
Page 9
4/12/2016
Identifying and extracting
relationships
rdf:Res ource
owl:Thing
Gene
Dis eas e
LewyBody
UCHL-1
Parkins onDis eas e
Page 10
4/12/2016
Extending the ontology based on
information queries
• Consider various queries and identify
concepts and relationships needed to
be part of PD ontology.
• These concepts are needed to retrieve
information and knowledge from the
system.
• This lead to additional new concepts.
See fig.5.4
Page 11
4/12/2016
PD: adding concepts to support
information queries
rdfs :Res ource
owl:Thing
Anatom icalEntity
Protein
Pathway
Page 12
4/12/2016
Ontology Re-use
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
It is desirable to re-use the ontology and vocabulary developed
in the healthcare and life-sciences fields.
Diseases: PD information can be used in Huntington’s and
Alzeimer’s. PD can reuse information from International
classification of diseases ICD and its subset SNOMED.
Genes: more genes and genomic concepts such as proteins,
pathways are added to ontologies. Consider connecting to Gene
Ontology.
Neurological concepts: Consider using Neuro names 2007.
Enzymes: concepts related to enzymes and other chemicals may
be required; you may use Enzyme Nomenclature 2007
Be aware of inconsistencies and circularities.
Multiple models may emerge; choice should be based on use
cases and functional requirements.
Page 13
4/12/2016
Data sources
• Now answering the question that we
posted in slide#6, three data sources
need to be integrated:
• Neuron database, PDSP KI database,
PubChem
Page 14
4/12/2016
Data Integration
• A centralized approach where data available through
web based interfaces is converted into RDF and
stored in a centralized repository
• A federated approach where data continues to reside
in the existing repositories. RDF mediator converts
underlying data into RDF format.
• RDF allows for focus on logical structures of
information in contrast to only representational
format (XML) or storage format (relational).
Page 15
4/12/2016
Mapping ontological concepts to
RDF graphs
• Sample query discussed earlier results in
these concepts:
–
–
–
–
Compartment located_on Neuron
Receptor located_in Compartment
Ligand binds_to Receptor
Ligand associated_with Disease
• Next task to map these into RDF maps in the
underlying data sources.
• Using ontological definitions, data sources,
SPARQL queries, and name space, RDF
graphs are extracted.
Page 16
4/12/2016
Generation and merging of RDF
graphs
D_Neuron
UR12
Neuron Database
D1
UR14
Parkinson’s disease
UR16
type
binds_to
associated_with
Neuron
UR12
D1
UR14
Located_in
D_Dendrite
UR12
5-H Tryptamine
UR15
Located_in
PDSPKI Database
Page 17
5-H Tryptamine
UR15
PubChem database
4/12/2016
Integrated RDF graph
Parkinson’s disease
UR16
D_Neuron
UR12
type
associated_with
Neuron
UR12
5-H Tryptamine
UR15
Located_in
D_Dendrite
UR12
Page 18
binds_to
Located_in
D1
UR14
4/12/2016
Exam question?
•
1.
2.
3.
4.
Consider the PD case study that used ontological approach to
querying distributed databases.
Discuss 10 reasons of using this approach as opposed to
common SQL query and relational database approach.
Why is Google, Yahoo or MSN search not good enough for
searching biological database?
Discuss centralized and federated approach to data
integration in the context of this case study.
Submit a softcopy of the document in the digital drop box.
How to do this? Read Chapter 5, read it again. The answers can be
formed from the information provided there and from your
experience with relational database systems.
Page 19
4/12/2016
Summary
• Semantic web technologies provide an attractive
technological informatics foundation for enabling the
Bench to Bedside Vision.
• Many areas of biomedical research including drug
discovery, systems biology, personalized medicine
rely heavily on integrating and interpreting
heterogeneous data set.
• This is part of ongoing work in the framework of the
work being performed in the Healthcare and Life
Sciences Interest Group of W3C.
Page 20
4/12/2016