Use of ACL in Audits & Investigations
Download
Report
Transcript Use of ACL in Audits & Investigations
Use of ACL
in Audits & Investigations
Lon S. Heuer, CPA, CIA
Associate Vice President for Institutional Compliance and
Director, Office of Internal Audits
Dyan G. Hudson, CISA
Associate Director, Office of Internal Audits
Agenda
Overview of Generalized Audit Software
How to Get Started
Getting Basic File Information
Looking for Anomalies
Detailed Transaction Analysis
Example – Procurement Card Case Study
Overview
What does it do?
Allows auditors to extract and analyze data
independent of programmers and auditees
Summarizes large amounts of data
100% testing of large populations
– Increases probability of detecting errors and
omissions
– Increases probability of detecting fraud
Getting Started
Know Your Data!
Know where to get it
– Platform (PC/mainframe/other) and format
– Quantity and extract options
– Knowledgeable staff
Know what it should look like
– Important fields
– Statistical expectations
Check key fields for validity
– Numeric / alphanumeric
– Blank / non-blank
– Valid codes
Getting Started
Validity Checks Demo
Get Basic Information
Generate summaries and statistics on key
fields
– Record count
– Totals and key subtotals
– Average, maximum, minimum values
Run “overview” reports (Classify,
Summarize)
Get Basic Information
Summary statistics demo
Overview reports demo
Look for Anomalies
Exception reports
Statistical deviance and digital analysis
– Benford’s Law
– Rounding of amounts
– Even dollar amounts
Stuff to Read:
www.utexas.edu/admin/audit/files/
Using Audit Tools
Case Studies
Digital Analysis
Look for Anomalies
Look for Anomalies
Look for Anomalies
Exception report demo
Benford’s analysis demo
Detailed Transaction Analysis
Extract “suspect” records for review
Select statistically valid sample for review
and extract
Detailed Transaction Analysis
Extract Demo
ACL Exercises
Go to
www.utexas.edu/admin/audit/files/
Download all files.
Open CARDUSE.ACL using ACL Workbook
and follow instructions in
EXERCISES.DOC.
Example
Procurement Card Fraud
Background
Fiscal Year 2000 Audit Plan – Spot Check
Procurement Card Program Fiscal Year 99
Follow up to 1997 audit
Statistics
– Over 300 departments and 1,680 cards
– 281,000 transactions (through 5/31/2002)
(78,463 in FY01, 63,559 in FY02 through 5/31)
– $41.3M
($12.0M in FY01, $9.3M in FY02 through 5/31)
Obtaining Data for Analysis
Data from Bank of America
Card Data
Transaction Data
Merged Transaction
Data File in ACL
Merchant Classes
Data from UT Accounting System
Accounting/Payment Data
Data Analysis Using ACL
Summaries & Statistics
High volume cardholders
High dollar cardholders
High volume merchants
High dollar merchants
Exceptions & Anomalies
Policy violations
Other unusual transactions
Policy Violations
Type of Purchase
Created reports based on merchant class code
to identify unusual types of purchases
International items
Gas
Gifts
Equipment Rental
Postal Service
Internet
Transportation
Clothing stores
Flowers
Pets
Bicycle shop
Charities
Schools
Colleges
Travel-related
Utilities (including telephone services)
Grocery stores
Antiques
Other Policy Violations
and Unusual Transactions
Transactions over $999.00 limit
Split Orders – multiple transactions to single
vendor on single day with total amount over
$999.00
Even dollar amounts
Sales tax paid to Texas merchants
Match Suspect Transactions
to Accounting Records
Complicated account postings and transfers
between accounts
Matched dollar amounts and dates using
ACL’s Duplicate function to identify
movement of funds between accounts
Scrutinized electronic routing and approval
of electronic payment documents to identify
weaknesses in segregation of duties and/or
insufficient account/transaction reviews
Initial Investigation
Reviewed Existing Reports
Ran Additional Reports - Single Card Use
Collection of Receipts
Meeting with Principal Investigators
Personnel Actions
Secure Electronic Hardware/ Files/ etc.
Coordination with Police and District Attorney’s
Office
Arrest of subject
Compilation of Evidence
Problems
Card Use (10/97 - 4/00)
• Transactions: 1,840
• Volume: $209,403
Post 4/99 Receipts Destroyed (65%)
Complicated Account Postings
Number/Type of Vendors
Compilation of Evidence
Approach
Document Each Transaction
Evaluate Source Documents:
• Original receipt
• Receipt copy - On request or by subpoena
• Vendor web sites - order history & account info
• E-mail purchase & shipping confirmations
Compilation of Evidence
Case I
Case II
Receipts
Receipt with forgery
Online order history
Online order history
Email confirmations
Email confirmations
Returns for credit on
personal cards
Case I - Receipts
Case I - Receipts
Case I – Online Order History
Case I – Email
Confirmation
Case I – Returns
Return
Order
Credit
Case II – Receipt
With Forgery
Forged Receipt
Case II – Receipt
With Forgery
Actual Receipt
Forged Receipt
Control Issues
Separation of Duties
Sharing of Passwords
Account Reconciliations
Minimal Account Reviews
Corrective Steps
Letters to Deans, Directors, Principal
Investigators, etc.
Follow-up Confirmations to Hierarchical
Groups
Improvement of Control Structure
On-going Part of Compliance Program
Improvement of
Control Structure
Website Information
http://www.utexas.edu/admin/purchasing/procard/pcardwelcome.html
Testing of new cardholders
http://www.utexas.edu/admin/purchasing/procard/pcardmodule1.html
Tightened card use limits
Review/acknowledge voucher approval
On-going Compliance Activities
Inclusion in Compliance Verification
System
Approvals of monthly vouchers
Quarterly reviews using ACL
Quarterly ACL Reviews
Card Use Reports
– Ranks by $ amount
– Ranks by # transactions
Card Use Summary
Quarterly ACL Reviews
Card Use Reports
– Ranks by $ amount
– Ranks by # transactions
Compliance/Miscellaneous Reports
– Transactions > $999.00
– Potential Split Orders
– Posting delays > 30 days
Compliance/Misc. Summary
Compliance/Misc. Summary
Quarterly ACL Reviews
Card Use Reports
– Ranks by $ amount
– Ranks by # transactions
Compliance/Miscellaneous Reports
– Transactions > $999.00
– Potential Split Orders
– Posting delays > 30 days
College/Department Level Reports
Quarterly ACL Reviews
Merchant Summary Reports
– High $ Merchants
– “Suspect” Merchants
– Merchant Types
Specific Card Investigations/Watches
Procard Review Procedures
Reports
Coordination with Other Departments
– Internal Audits
– Purchasing
– Accounts Payable
Follow-up
Lon Heuer
[email protected]
Questions?
Dyan Hudson
[email protected]