Transcript presentation_2_word

Dogs and Humans
How the barks and body can affect the communications we have
Brendan Redfield
Introduction
Dogs and humans evolved together
General understanding of each other
Humans and our ways
Humans vocalize (language and gesture-calls)
Use gestures to express ourselves
Motivated through sharing knowledge
Cognitive skills of understanding others knowledge level
The ways of the Canine
Vocalizations show emotion
Body language shows requests
Rely heavily on humans for their needs
What we want to know
What factors affect human to canine
communication?
Can a human be the only one to affect the
communication?
Are the communication methods of canines
inherited or are they an effect of conditioning?
How humans affect
communications
Training and conditioning
Belgian Military Defense Team canines, University
of Namur, (Haverbeke, 2010)
Head and body position, as well as eye directions
Yamamoto (2011)
Human-to-Human interactions
University of Milan (Marshall-Pescini, 2011)
Layout of Experiment
room
Dark grey = Generous
Light grey = Selfish
(Marshall-Pascini, 2011)
How dogs affect
communications
Size of the dogs breed (Helton, 2010)
Larger breed = more obedient
Vocalizations express emotions (Yeon,2007)
Taped dogs sound the same to humans
Having knowledge and sharing knowledge (Kaminski,
2011)
Find the object test
Inherited or Conditioned
Wolves and wild canines do not use
vocalizations the same way as domesticated
dogs (Kaminski, 2011)
Belgian Military Defense Team canines,
University of Namur, (Haverbeke, 2010)
Sofia and Rossi (2008)
Sofia and Rossi
While this cartoon is making a
joke about
communication between
species, this is reality.
Sofia’s “request”
keyboard
Conclusion
I have found that there is much to learn and that
more tests are needed to determine if dogs are
using a form of language or just barking to say
they are happy.
References
Cavanaugh, Lisa A.; Leonard, Hillary A.; Scammon, Debra L.; “A tail of two personalities: How canine companions shape relationships
and well-being”. Journal of Business Research, Vol 61(5), May, 2008.
Haverbeke, Anouck, Frederic Messaoudi, Eric Depiereux, Miguel Stevens, Jean-Marie Giffroy, Claire Diedrich. “Efficiency of working
dogs undergoing a new Human Familiarization and Training Program”. Journal of Veterinary Behavior. Volume 5. 2010. Web. Sept 26,
2011.
Helton, William S.; Helton, Nicole D.. “Physical size matters in the domestic dog's (Canis lupus familiaris) ability to use human pointing
cues.” Behavioural Processes, Sep2010, Vol. 85 Issue 1, p77-79.
Kaminski, Juliane; Neumann, Martina; Bräuer, Juliane; Call, Josep; Tomasello, Michael; “Dogs,
Canis familiaris,
communicate with humans to request but not to inform.” Animal Behaviour, Vol 82(4), Oct, 2011. pp. 651-658.
Marshall-Pescini, Passalacqua, Ferrario, Valsecchi, Prato-Previde. “Social Eavesdropping in the domestic dog”. www.elsevier.com.
March 27 2011. Web. Sept 26 2011.
Overall, Karen L. “How animal signals inform us about behavior.” Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research,
Vol 6(1), Jan-Feb, 2011. pp. 1-3.
Pongrácz, Péter; Molnár, Csaba; Miklósi, Ádám; “Acoustic parameters of dog barks carry emotional information for humans”. Applied
Animal Behaviour Science, Vol 100(3-4),
Nov, 2006. pp. 228-240.
Rossi, Alexandre Pongrácz; Ades, César; “A dog at the keyboard: Using arbitrary signs to communicate requests”. Animal Cognition, Vol
11(2), Apr, 2008. pp. 329-338.
Yamamoto, Mariko; Ohtani, Nobuyo; Ohta, Mitsuaki; Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research, Vol 6(1), JanFeb, 2011. pp. 4-11.
Yeon, Seong Chan; “The vocal communication of canines”. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research, Vol
2(4), Jul-Aug, 2007. pp. 141-149.