The Functions of Language - Emmy Nadia : A Teacher E
Download
Report
Transcript The Functions of Language - Emmy Nadia : A Teacher E
The Functions of Language
- Intentional and Unintentional
Communication
EDL 1201
Linguistics for the Language
Teacher
Discussions about the
functions of language
Chomsky says it is what might be called
as the ‘human essence’.
Corder states that ‘too complex to be
defined’
Cook states it as ‘the heart of human life’
Poole defines it as “the faculty for
communication by speech sounds, is a
universal characteristic of the human
race’
Many linguists have defined it as:
- by which man communicates
- a system of communication
- for the purposes of communication and
many others which serves the many
needs of humans.
What are the functions of language?
To communicate
To maintain good or bad relations with
others (make small talk/ negative
functions)
To entertain (amusing ourselves &
others)
To inform/ passing on information
(Trask & Mayblin 2002)
Language as means of
Communication
Pit Corder states that we have to make a
distinction between ‘intentional’ and
‘unintentional ‘ communication in order to
understand what language is in
communication.
Intentional comm.
Unintentional comm.
Intentional comm.
That is to convey messages through speech
acts, or non speech acts.
There is the intent to really pass on some
information, like giving a speech, a lecture, a
talk, or merely talking to others.
Walking, for instance, can be termed as
communicating intentionally. How?
“She flounced out off the room and slammed
the door.”
Unintentional comm.
Corder gives the example of – if we see a
friend walking - unobserved by him, within
fairly broad limits, we may be able to draw
some conclusions about him. About what?
His walk tells us something about him– his
state of mind or health, for instance.
But, no one would suggest that he is walking
that way, in order to communicate with us??
What does this tell us?
unintentional comm.2
All our behaviour, in some measure is
communicative – receiver learns smthg,
even tho the sender has no speific
intention to comm.
So, as to conclude – behaviour is
informative and communicative.
Unintentional comm3
As we can tell someone from her walk, we can
as well gain info from someone’s else voice.
We can infer certain things from a person’s
voice.
By the tone of voice – we can tell if a person is
excited, angry, or tired.
What about disguising one’s voice? – to
mislead?
Conclusion – all human behaviour can be
informative, and can be a mode of
communication.
So, the distinction?
The distinction between intentional and
unintentional communication lies in the
sender’s mind.
The distinction between ‘being informed’
and ‘not being informed’ lies in the
receiver’s mind.
2nd distinction?
Is between linguistic and non linguistic
communication
Trying to establish communication with a
friend.
Linguistically – one may wave and then say
“Hey Bob, come here a moment.”
Non-linguistically – making an ill articulated
sound and then some actions, which in
convention is agreeable to both sender and
receiver, means the same as above.
Is there a distinction?
linguists state that the distinction is unclear
Writing is also linguistically communicative and
intentional, but it is not verbal
We use ‘coughs’, ‘shouts’, ‘yawns’ and a wide
range of other vocal signals, but few linguists
would regard that as ‘linguistic’.
But what all linguists agree on, is the presence
of the human cognitive aspect.
Communication and Meaning
Humans can communicate intentionally by
other than linguistic means.
– our posture, walk, tone of voice, gesture,
our manner of walking, dressing and eating
can mean something to others.
But, it has to have the conventional element to
it to be accepted and understood by others.
Eg – behaviour like – ‘liking someone’, ‘angry’,
other emotions. (how do show disliking, envy,
etc.)
Humans live in a society, and there are
behaviours that we learned in our society and
acceptable and understood specifically in that
society group. This is what it means by having
a conventional element in it.
For example- a tired walk: there is an
accepted way of walking which means tired.
What about ‘like’? or ‘embarrassed’? ‘shy’? –
probably all our behavior has a conventional
element in them.
Behaviour to communicate
Any deliberate manipulation of bodily
behaviour is called ‘paralinguistics’.
These includes – gestures, posture,
facial expressions, and the tempo, pitch,
and quality of speech.
Exploiting both speech and
paralinguistics would mean a clearer
communication can be established.
What is communicated?
Traditionally it is ‘Thought’, or ‘expressing our
thoughts’..
But that is not its only function. Language can
be used to communicate beliefs, opinions or
perceptions, small talk, etc.
However, a bit of language cannot be taken
out of context, in isolation from the situation
and context it is made. Eg. “I love you.” –
means so many things if taken out of context,
can be misunderstood.
Further readings
Finegan, Chapt 1, pp. 18-31
Read also on the ‘properties of the
human language’.