THE MIND IN TALK: The Processes of Cognition and Emotion
Download
Report
Transcript THE MIND IN TALK: The Processes of Cognition and Emotion
3112: COMMUNICATION IN
ORGANIZATIONS
THE MIND IN TALK:
The Process of Cognition
Lecture 3b
IP COMMUNICATION:
A REMINDER
2
or more people act together to
create, sustain and manage meanings
through
the sending and receiving of
messages
using
socially shared verbal symbols
Describing those “in the
head”pictures (perceptions)
COGNITION AND
COMMUNICATION
THINKING - WE ALL ATTACH WORDS
TO IMAGES BUT
DO WE USE MANY WAYS TO NAME
IMAGES OR FEW
COMPLEX THINKERS OR SIMPLE
BLACK-WHITE; EITHER-OR THINKING
MANY LEVELS, APPROACHES OR FEW
BUT MOST CRITICALLY:
• CAN WE DISTINGUISH BETWEEN
INFERENCE AND FACT?
DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN REPORTS,
INFERENCES, JUDGMENTS
REPORTS (DATA):
• STATEMENTS THAT CAN BE VERIFIED OR
DISPROVED
INFERENCES (ASSUMPTIONS):
• STATEMENTS ABOUT THE UNKNOWN MADE
ON THE BASIS OF WHAT IS KNOWN
JUDGMENTS (CONCLUSIONS):
• EXPRESSES APPROVAL OF DISAPPROVAL
A MODEL OF MENTAL PROCESSES
The
Inference Ladder
Simple, Clear Metaphor For
How The Mind Works
Most
of this
automatic
THE TERM “LADDER OF
INFERENCE” DESCRIBES ONE OF
THE BASIC HABITS OF MIND THAT
CAN GET IN THE WAY OF CLEAR,
RATIONAL THOUGHT AND
COMMUNICATION.
• OUR BELIEFS ARE THE TRUTH
• THE TRUTH IS OBVIOUS
• OUR BELIEFS ARE BASED ON REAL DATA
• DATA WE SELECT ARE THE REAL DATA
• WE DECIDE WE HAVE ALL THE DATA WE NEED
I TAKE ACTIONS
BASED ON MY BELIEFS THE REFLEXIVE
Cognition
Perception
I ADAPT BELIEFS
ABOUT THE WORLD
I DRAW CONCLUSIONS -
LOOP
MAKE JUDGEMENTS
I MAKE ASSUMPTIONS BASED
ON THE MEANINGS I ADDED
I ADD MEANINGS
(CULTURAL AND PERSONAL)
(OUR
BELIEFS
AFFECT
WHAT DATA
WE SELECT
NEXT TIME)
I SELECT “DATA” FROM
WHAT I OBSERVE
OBSERVABLE “DATA” AND EXPERIENCES
(AS A VIDEOTAPE RECORDER MIGHT
CAPTURE IT)
THINKING AND THE
MISUSE OF LANGUAGE
THE UNCALCULATED RISK
FAILURE TO RECOGNIZE WHERE YOU ARE ON INFERENCE
LADDER
ALLNESS
USING “ALWAYS”, “NEVER” SPEAKING AS IF YOUR
STATEMENT IS ALL THERE IS TO SAY ABOUT IT - SWEEPING
CONCLUSION AT TOP OF INFERENCE LADDER
INTENSIONAL ORIENTATION
REACTING TO SOMETHING AS IF ITS NAME/TITLE WERE THE
THING ITSELF - LABELLING LEVEL OF INFERENCE LADDER
THINKING AND THE MISUSE
OF LANGUAGE
INDISCRIMINATION (STEREOTYPING):
THINKING THAT ALL PEOPLE IN A CATEGORY HAVE IDENTICAL
CHARACTERISTICS - ACHIEVING QUICK CLOSURE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE
INFERENCE LADDER
STATIC EVALUATION:
RETAIN EVALUATIONS WITHOUT CHANGE WHILE THE REALITY IS
ALWAYS CHANGING.
NEXT WE ’LL DISCUSS THAT PROCESS OF THE MIND
THAT ENERGIZES AND CAN EVEN DRIVE OUR
THOUGHTS: EMOTIONS