Transcript Rewards and Social Comparison Theories of Motivation

Rewards and Social
Comparison Theories of
Motivation
Deci et al. (1999)
Miles et al. (1989)
Harder (1991)
Agenda – June 9, 2005








Return SAP 1
Reminders
Questions, Comments, and Concerns
Reward and Social Comparison Theories of
Motivation
Break
TRP 2
Discussion
Next Week
Return SAP 1
If You Submitted SAP 1 and Did
Not Receive It Back, Please
Contact Me Immediately
Reminders
SAPs 3 and 4 Due Next Week
Conclude Motivation at End of
Next Week
Questions, Comments,
or Concerns?
Summarize the Empirical Support for
Maslow’s and Alderfer’s Needs Theories. What
Applications Does McClelland’s Needs Theory
Have to HRM?
Turn In SAP 2
Please Pass to the Center Isle and
then Pass to the Front of the
Room
Rewards and Social Comparison
Theories Of Motivation

Rewards Theories




Revisit Operant Conditioning and Skinner
Behavior Modification
Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Motivation
Social Comparison Theory



Adams Equity Theory
Problems with “Comparison Other”
Evidence of Adams’s Outcomes
Rewards Theories


Sometimes Referred to as “Reinforcement”
Revisit Operant Conditioning



Behavior Modification (BMod)


Rewards, Punishment, and Extinction
Based on “Outside” Influences
Systematic Intervention to Correct Behavior
Deci’s Cognitive Evaluation Theory


Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Motivators
Issue of “Over Justification” of Rewards
Social Comparison Theories



Adams Equity Theory
OP/IP =OO/IO
Issues with “Comparison” Other



Adams Suggested Outcomes



No Selection of True Peers
Cognitive Reevaluation
Mixed Findings for “Over Outcome” Hypotheses
Strong Support for “Under Outcome” Hypotheses
Idea of “Fairness”
Break
Let’s Take a 20 Minute Break
TRP 2
Discussion
Paradox: Pay Reduces Intrinsic
Motivation, Yet Pay Leads to
Strong Equity-Driven Motivation
Next Week


Conclude Motivation
Tuesday





Roberts & Glick (1981)
Champoux (1991)
Vroom (1964)
Wood & Bandura (1989)
SAP 3 and TRP 3