explanation of the audiogram and immittance tutorial
Download
Report
Transcript explanation of the audiogram and immittance tutorial
Presented by: Candice “Evie” Ortiz, AuD
Conduction of Stimuli
Air Conduction
Signals are delivered through the outer,
middle and inner ears
Further processing in the CANS
Bone Conduction
Signal delivered to the mastoid bone
○ Bypasses the conductive mechanism
Stimulates both cochlea simultaneously
Masking
Used to obtain accurate thresholds
when cross-hearing is likely
Asymmetrical hearing losses of ≥ 40dB or
≥60dB
○ Dependent on transducers
Gaps of ≥ 15dB during BC
Non-test ear is kept “busy” by the
introduction of a masking noise
Basics of the Audiogram
Classification of Hearing Loss
Picture Adapted from: Bess, F.H., Humes, L.E., Audiology: The fundamentals, 2003.
Normal: -10 to 25 dB
Mild: 26 to 40 dB
Moderate: 41 to 55 dB
Moderately-Severe: 56 to 70 dB
Severe: 71 to 90 dB
Profound: > 90 dB
Common Audiometric
Configurations
Type of Hearing Loss
Sensorineural
(SNHL)
No air-bone gaps
○ ≥15 dB gap between
AC and BC thresholds
Conductive (CHL)
≥15dB air-bone gap
Consistent with middle
ear pathology
Maximum conductive
component is 60dB
Describing a Hearing Loss
Degree, Configuration, Location, Type
Examples
○ Mild to severe sloping SNHL
No location implies that loss affects all frequecies
○ Severe high frequency SNHL
○ Moderate to mild rising low frequency CHL
Describing Hearing Loss
Essentially Mild
Profound
Normal
Normal
Mild to
Moderate
Describing Hearing Loss
Turn to Handouts
Familiar Sounds Audiogram
Not Audible
SAT, SRT, and WRS
Speech Audiometry
Speech Recognition
Threshold (SRT)
Adults
Speech Awareness
Threshold (SAT)
Infants and
Non-Verbal patients
Useful in determining
test reliability
Malingering
Does not understand task
Reliability Determination
PTA = 3
PTA = 35
Good SRT-PTA agreement
Good SRT-PTA agreement
PTA = 10
PTA = 35
Good SRT-PTA agreement
Poor SRT-PTA agreement
Clinical Application of
Word Recognition Tests
Determine site of lesion
PB Rollover
Surgery candidacy
Hearing aid candidacy
If poor WRS, may not be a good candidate
Word Recognition Consideration
Dx: Otosclerosis
Tx: Stapedectomy
Q: Which side?
+
Rollover Rollover
Very Poor WRS
May not be a good hearing aid candidate
Consider CROS style or additional testing
Tympanometry
Graphic
representation of ear
compliance in
relation to static
pressure changes
Normative Tympanometry Values
Children Ages 3-5 years
EAR CANAL
VOLUME (cm3)
COMPLIANCE
(ml)
MEAN
0.5
0.7
90% RANGE
0.4 to 1.0
0.2 to 0.9
Adults
EAR CANAL
VOLUME (cm3)
COMPLIANCE
(ml)
MEAN
1.1
0.8
90% RANGE
0.6 to 1.5
0.3 to 1.4
Peak Pressure is typically WNL in the range of -150 to +25 daPA
Compliance refers to mobility of tympanic membrane
Margolis and Heller (1987)
Tympanometric Configurations: Middle Ear Pathology
Tympanometric Configurations:
Middle Ear Pathology
Type A
Type As
Normal or Hypomobility
Otosclerosis
Tympanometric Configurations:
Middle Ear Pathology
Type C
Negative pressure
Eustachian Tube
dysfunction
Developing otitis
media
TM retraction
Tympanometric Configurations:
Middle Ear Pathology
Type Ad
Hypermobile
Aging
Atrophic scars
Healed perforation
Ossicular
discontinuity
Tympanometric Configurations:
Middle Ear Pathology
Type B
Flat
Perforated TM
ECV = 7.0
Patent PE tube
Tympanometric Configurations:
Middle Ear Pathology
Type B
Flat
Middle ear fluid
ECV = 1.0
Serous Otitis
Blocked PE tube
Tympanometric Configurations:
Middle Ear Pathology
Type B
ECV = 0.2
Flat
Impacted cerumen
Tympanometric Configurations:
Middle Ear Pathology
Type B?
Type As?
Middle ear fluid
ART and AR Decay
Acoustic Reflexes
Acoustic reflex threshold (ART):
Lowest level at which an AR can be
obtained
Most sensitive to middle ear pathology
Normative Values
○ Present for SNHL up to 50 dB
○ WNL from 70 to 100 dB
○ Elevated responses (≥100 dB) for thresholds
< 50 dB
Stapedial Reflex Arc
Presentation of an
intense sound elicits
a contraction of the
stapedius muscle
Changes the ear’s
immittance
“Probe Right” Acoustic Reflexes
Probe
Stimulus (ipsi)
Stimulus (contra)
Common Acoustic Reflex Patterns
ART Patterns:
Unilateral CHL
CHL, AD
WNL, AS
ART Patterns:
VIII CN or CPA outside of brainstem
Mild high frequency
SNHL, AD
WNL, AS
ART Patterns:
Lesions within brainstem which involve reflex pathways
Mild high frequency
SNHL, AU
ART Patterns:
Facial Nerve Lesion
WNL, AU
Absent probe right
Lesion proximal to
stapedius nerve
Verticle segment
of facial nerve
ART Patterns:
Cochlear Impairment
Acoustic Reflex Decay
Retrocochlear Test
Measure of ability to
maintain reflex
contraction during a
continuous stimulation
Positive Result
Response decays to
≥ ½ its original
magnitude
Techniques, Age-Appropriate Results, Management
Testing Techniques:
Newborns and Infants
Otoacoustic Emissions (OAE)
Measures pre-neural signals produced by outer
hair cells
Objective measure
Quick and easy
Non-invasive
Sensitive to:
○ Presence of hearing loss
○ Problems affecting integrity of cochlea
Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR)
If baby does not pass OAE
Testing Techniques:
Behavioral Observation Audiometry (BOA)
3
months through 6 months
Parents hold infant
Observe natural response to sounds
○ e.g., eye widening or eye shifts
No reinforcement needed
(Developmental) Age
Appropriate Response Levels
TONES (dB)
SPEECH
(dB)
0 TO 6 WKS
75
50
6 WKS TO 4 MOS
70
45
4 TO 7 MOS
50
20
7 TO 9 MOS
45
15
9 TO 13 MOS
35
10
As age increases,
responses to softer
sounds increase
Generally more
responsive to speech
than tones and narrow
band noise
Testing Techniques:
Visual Reinforcement Audiometry (VRA)
Age: 6 mos – 3 yrs (developmental)
Teach a child to turn their heads in
response to sound, by reinforcing the
act with visual stimuli
Requires head control and good vision
Can be performed with all transducers
Testing Techniques:
Visual Reinforcement Audiometry
Patient on lap
Focus held ahead
by a distracting
assistant
When sound is
heard, child turns
toward speaker
Action rewarded by
an animated, visual
reinforcer
VRA Video
VRA In Action
Testing Techniques:
Conditioned Play Audiometry
Age: 3 – 4 yrs
Child reacts in
“game” fashion
when a sound is
heard
Requires active
listening
Longitudinal
Case Study
Child diagnosed with Trisomy 21
Failed Newborn Infant Hearing Screen
No show at 1 month ABR appointment
Audiogram:
3 Months Old
Impacted cerumen
removed prior
Tymps were WNL
Tolerated
headphones but not
BC
Hearing Loss??
Age Appropriate
Response Levels
TONES (dB)
0 TO 6 WKS
SPEECH
(dB)
75
50
6 WKS TO 4 MOS 70
45
4 TO 7 MOS
50
20
7 TO 9 MOS
45
15
9 TO 13 MOS
35
10
Probably not
Monitor closely due to
risk factors
Every 3 months
ME pathologies
Impacted cerumen
due to ear canal
size
Audiogram:
10 Months Old
Developmental Age:
6 mos
More difficult to test
More active
Won’t tolerate
headphones
Responding with
eye shifts only
Audiogram:
18 Months Old
Will not tolerate
headphones
Audiogram:
6 Years Old
Play is usually used
at 3-4 yr of age
Cerumenectomy
1 wk prior
Every 6 months, prior to
audio evaluation.
Necessary maintenance
for managing his
chronic ME pathology.
And for maintaining
good hearing.
Audiogram:
9 Years Old
Audiogram:
10 Years Old
No cerumenectomy
prior
Impaction AD
Unable to rule out ME
pathology
Pediatric Goals
Verify and/or enable
access to speech
sounds in order to
promote speech and
language
development