Transcript NANOOS

Northwest Association of Networked Ocean
Observing Systems
INDUSTRY DAY
11 Aug 2005
Northwest Association of Networked Ocean
Observing Systems
The Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS)
Regional Association for the Pacific NW
What are we?
• A regional organization through which to integrate and
sustain existing observing capability, to strategize for
new operational systems, and to provide easy access to
data, data products, model forecasts, etc. about regional
marine conditions
– Developing a user-driven regional coastal ocean observing
system
• “ocean” includes inland marine waters (head of tide to EEZ)
• “user-driven” means users define priorities, delivery
• A system designed to produce and disseminate ocean
observations and related products deemed necessary to
the users, in a common manner and according to sound
scientific practice
Fundamental Issue:
We are limited and poorly coordinated with
respect to environmental data supporting
fundamental societal needs
R. Spinrad, NOAA
The Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS)
Oceans & Coasts Component of the U.S. Integrated Earth Observing
System (IEOS) & the International GEOSS
An Interagency Collaboration
for the Public Good
NOAA
Navy
NASA
NSF
USACE
USGS
MMS
EPA
USCG
DOE
http://www.ocean.us
T. Malone, Ocean.US
What will IOOS do?
The U.S. Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) is developing as
a “user-driven”, integrated system of observations and data telemetry,
data management and communications (DMAC), and data analysis and
modeling that routinely, reliably, and continuously provides data
and information required to address seven societal goals:
(1) Improve predictions of climate change and weather and
their effects on coastal communities and the nation;
(2) Improve the safety and efficiency of maritime operations;
(3) Improve forecasts of natural hazards and mitigate their effects
more effectively;
(4) Improve homeland security;
(5) Minimize public health risks;
(6) Protect and restore healthy coastal ecosystems more
effectively; and
(7) Sustain living marine resources.
1 System, 7 Goals
A brief history of IOOS
•
•
•
•
NOPP established by law in 1997
NORLC has oversight of NOPP
NORLC recommends an IOOS in 1998-1999
NOPP establishes Ocean.US in 2000 to
implement a user-driven IOOS
– Global IOOS and Coastal IOOS
– Coastal IOOS to have two components:
• National Backbone
• Regional Coastal Ocean Observing Systems
managed by Regional Associations
Coastal Component
of IOOS
AOOS
NANOOS
National Backbone
• Federal Agencies Responsible
• EEZ & Great Lakes
• Core variables required by RAs & Fed Agencies
• Network of sentinel & reference stations
• Data Standards/Exchange Protocols
NERA
CeNCOOS
GLOS
PacIOOS
MACOORA
SCCOOS
Regional Coastal Ocean Observing Systems
• Regional Associations Responsible
• Involve private & public sectors
• Inform Federal Agencies of user needs
• Enhance the backbone based on user needs
• Incorporate sub–regional systems
SECOORA
GCOOS
CaRA
T. Malone, Ocean.US
The National Federation of Regional Associations (NFRA)
• Foster communication between the RAs and
the Federal agencies that establish standards
and protocols for an integrated ocean observing
system, operate the backbone of the national
system, and help fund the RAs;
•Serve as an advocate for the RAs to the federal
agencies, the Congress and the general public;
•Participate with the federal agencies and
Ocean.US in establishing, standards, protocols,
and best practices for coastal ocean observing
systems;
•Promote the science, technologies, education,
and management required for continuous
improvement and reliable operation of coastal
ocean observing systems among the Regional
Associations and with the federal agencies; and
•Promote understanding of the potential of an
integrated ocean observing system to meet
society’s needs as identified in the seven
societal pillars of the IOOS.
Education
Governance
Business Plan
TOTAL
X
X
Y3
X
X
X
X
14
X
X
X
7
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Y5
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Y4
X8
X
X
X
X
X
15
11
2
X
P
X
X
X
2
X
X
P
X
X
X
1
X
X
F
X
X
X
X
12
1
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
12
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
8
13
8
8
8
11
11
11
6
X
X
13
1
TOTAL
3
X
X
F
X
X6
X
PacIOOS
3
X
X
P
X
X
X
CaRA
3
X
X
F
X
X
X
NERA1,2
X
3
X
X
SCCOOS1
X
MACOORA
3
X
X
P
X
X
X
CeNCOOS
Infrastructure
3
X
X
P
X
X
X
NANOOS
Funding Year
Governing Body
Website
Staff
Stakeholders
Inventory
Gap analysis
Regional
Coordination
International
Coordination
Subregional OS
Real-time
Pilot Project
DMAC
Implementation
Council
Plan in Review
Approved by
Stakeholders
In Review
Approved by
Stakeholders
AOOS
Funding
Organization
GLOS1
Activity
GCOOS
Category
SECOORA
Regional Association Progress
X
14
7
10
9
4
8
8
2
4
3
2
1
3
7
The Political Environment
• Commission on Ocean
Policy
 Report
• Executive Order
 Ocean Action Plan
• Pending Legislation
 Senate (S. 361)
 House (H.R. 1489, 1584)
T. Malone, Ocean.US
IOOS Legislation
• S. 361– Has been passed unanimously by
the full Senate [$150M authorized]
• H.R. 1489 – Still in committee. Resumes
mark-up by Oct.-Nov. [$ not specified]
• H.R. 1584 – Still in committee. Mirrors
language of S. 361 [$150M]
Northwest Association
Of Networked Ocean
Observing Systems
(NANOOS)
http://www.nanoos.org
Who are we?
• NANOOS Coordinator (Executive Director per execution of MOA):
– Jan Newton, University of Washington
• Steering Committee (Governing Council per MOA):
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
David Martin, University of Washington (NANOOS PI)
Antonio Baptista, Oregon Health and Sciences University
Jack Barth, Oregon State University
Robert Bohlman, Marine Exchange of Puget Sound
Patrick Corcoran, Oregon Sea Grant Program
Mike Kosro, Oregon State University
Greg McMurray, Oregon Dept of Land Conservation & Development
Ian Miller, Surfrider Foundation
Jay Pearlman, The Boeing Company
Terry Wright, Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission
NANOOS Members
to date…
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Ocean Inquiry Project
Oregon Dept of Land Conservation & Development
Surfrider Foundation
The Boeing Company
Oregon State University
Puget Sound Action Team
University of Washington
WET Labs, Inc.
Oregon Health and Science University
Quileute Indian Tribe
Oregon Dept of Geology and Mineral Industries
Humboldt University
Marine Exchange of Puget Sound
Washington State Dept of Ecology
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
NANOOS Members
to date…
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Ocean Inquiry Project
Oregon Dept of Land Conservation & Development
Surfrider Foundation
The Boeing Company
Oregon State University
Puget Sound Action Team
University of Washington
WET Labs, Inc.
Oregon Health and Science University
Quileute Indian Tribe
Oregon Dept of Geology and Mineral Industries
Humboldt University
Marine Exchange of Puget Sound
Washington State Dept of Ecology
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
NGO
State Gov’t
Industry
Academia/Research
Tribes
A brief history of
NANOOS
•
Received $100K 1st year planning grant from NOAA Coastal Services Center (late 2003)
•
Pacific Northwest Regional Ocean Observing System Workshop I:
23-24 October 2003, Portland State University, Portland, OR
–
–
Signed a Charter establishing NANOOS
Appointed a Steering Committee
•
Two pilot proposals submitted to NOAA CSC; one funded regarding estuaries and coasts
•
NANOOS Governance Workshop II: 5-7 May 2004, Oregon H&S Univ., Beaverton, OR
–
–
–
Gained consensus on Governance Structure and Approach
Held a User Needs Forum
Gained consensus response on prioritization for federal and regional activity
•
Received 2nd year developmental grant from NOAA with support for Coordinator
•
Hired NANOOS Coordinator on 1 November 2004
•
3rd year developmental proposal recommended for funding by NOAA FY ’05-06
•
NANOOS System Design Workshop III: 28 Feb-1 Mar 2005, NOAA-PMEL, Seattle, WA
–
–
Gained input on priority user needs
Gained input on system design responsive to user needs
NANOOS Governance Structure
Steering Committee
Users Advisory Group
Governing Council
NANOOS
Coordinator
Executive Committee
Officers, NANOOS Executive Director, Standing Committee Chairs
DMAC
Education
Workshops
User/Stakeholder
Outreach
Standing Committees:
Operations Committee
Data/Information Management and
Communications Committee
Modeling and Analysis Product Committee
Science and Research Committee
Education and Outreach Committee
Nominating Committee
Other NANOOS
Priorities
A
B
System Design: strategy
• Integrate what we have:
 NANOOS Pilot project
• Strategize to build what we need:
 Prioritize NANOOS backbone and RCOOS
20
“A Pilot Coastal Ocean Observatory for the
Estuaries and Shores of Oregon and Washington”
Goal: Regional integration and expansion of existing but disparate
observation and modeling capabilities for the estuaries and shores
of Oregon (OR) and Washington (WA).
Explore and advance the following objectives:







Create a regional observation network
Create a regional modeling system
Create a cross-site information system
Create cross-site quality metrics
Develop cross-training mechanisms
Proactively engage regional and local communities
Proactively participate in the design of:
 A river-to-ocean NANOOS
 A national IOOS
NANOOS Pilot Marine
Monitoring Components
Puget Sound, WA
Willapa Bay, WA
South Slough Estuary, OR
Columbia River Estuary
Vision
Salinity
Depth (m)
• Marine data & forecasts aboard every vessel
• Every vessel as a data source
NANOOS Pilot Project
•Demonstrated feasibility
•Seeks partnerships
NANOOS-CORIE
forecast at sensor depth
Sensor in vessel
(real-time)
NANOOS-CORIE
forecast at sea surface
OGI02
• M/V Forerunner
• F/V Piky
• R/V Wecoma
OGI01
System Design
GOAL: To identify and prioritize user-driven data products and design the
observational system that can be responsive to these needs.
In 3rd Planning Workshop, we gained input on:
* What are the specific, prioritized data products and who are the users who
need these?
* Based on these prioritized products, what variables are needed?
* Given the priority variables identified, what are the system design priorities
(location, measurement capabilities, phasing, etc.) for various technologies:
Buoys; HF; Satellite infrastructure; Surveys; Other platforms; Models; Data
output ?
Based on this and other input, a system design “vision document”
will be drafted, compiling and synthesizing the information, and
will be used for outreach and further refinement.
ID of PNW User Groups
From NOAA/NANOOS analysis:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Marine shipping and oil transport/spill remediation
Search and rescue
Shellfish fishery and aquaculture
Marine recreation
Natural resource/environmental management
National and homeland security
Finfish aquaculture
Research institutions
Education
Commercial groundfishing
Crab fishery
Potential Roles of Industry
(You’re here today to help define)
Table for IOOS/West Coast Industry Meeting
Industry
Roles in Ocean Observing
User
Shipping
Software
Cruise Ship
Petroleum
Aquaculture
Shipbuilders
Electricity
Water
Desalinization
Enviro. Pred’n
Agriculture
Ocean tech
Com Fish
Rec Fish
Insurance
Tourism
Aerospace
Oceanroutes
x
Data/Infra Comp/Tech Integrator Operator
x
x
x
x
x
Value
Added
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x