Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007
Download
Report
Transcript Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007
PHYS 5326 – Lecture #9
Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007
Dr. Jae Yu
1. Quantum Electro-dynamics (QED)
2. Local Gauge Invariance
3. Introduction of Massless Vector Gauge
Field
Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007
PHYS 5326, Spring 2007
Jae Yu
1
Announcements
• First term exam will be on Wednesday, Mar. 7
• It will cover up to what we finish today
• The due for all homework up to last week’s is
Monday, Mar. 19
Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007
PHYS 5326, Spring 2007
Jae Yu
2
Prologue
• How is a motion described?
– Motion of a particle or a group of particles can be expressed in
terms of the position of the particle at any given time in classical
mechanics.
• A state (or a motion) of particle is expressed in terms of
wave functions that represent probability of the particle
occupying certain position at any given time in Quantum
mechanics
– With the operators provide means for obtaining values for
observables, such as momentum, energy, etc
• A state or motion in relativistic quantum field theory is
expressed in space and time.
• Equation of motion in any framework starts with
Lagrangians.
Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007
PHYS 5326, Spring 2007
Jae Yu
3
Non-relativistic Equation of Motion for Spin 0 Particle
Energy-momentum relation in classical mechanics give
2
p
V E
2m
Quantum prescriptions; p , E i .
i
t
provides the non-relativistic equation of motion for field, y,
the Schrödinger Equation
V i
2m
t
2
2
2
Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007
represents the probability of finding the
particle of mass m at the position (x,y,z)
PHYS 5326, Spring 2007
Jae Yu
4
Relativistic Equation of Motion for Spin 0 Particle
Relativistic energy-momentum relationship
E p c m c p p m c 0
2
2 2
2 4
2 2
With four vector notation of quantum prescriptions;
p
i
where
;
x
1
,
,
,
1
2
3
0
c
t
x
y
z
Relativistic equation of motion for field, y, the Klein-Gordon Equation
2nd order
in time
m2c2 0
2
1
mc
2
2
2
c t
Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007
2
2
PHYS 5326, Spring 2007
Jae Yu
5
Relativistic Equation of Motion (Dirac Equation) for
Spin 1/2 Particle
To avoid 2nd order time derivative term, Dirac attempted to
factor relativistic energy-momentum relation
p p m c 0
2 2
This works for the case with zero three momentum
p
0 2
m c p mc p mc 0
2 2
0
0
This results in two first order equations
p mc 0
0
p mc 0
0
Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007
PHYS 5326, Spring 2007
Jae Yu
6
Dirac Equation Continued…
The previous prescription does not work for the case with non-0 three
momentum
p p m2c2 k pk mc p mc
k pk p mc k k pk m 2c 2
The terms linear to momentum should disappear, so k k
To make it work, we must find coefficients
k
k
p
p
pk p
to satisfy:
p p p p
p p p p
p p p p p p Other Cross Terms
0 2
1 2
0 2
0 2
0 1
1 0
2 2
1 2
3 2
1 2
0 2
0 1
2 2
2 2
3 2
2 0
0 3
0
2
3 2
3 0
0
3
The coefficients like 0=1 and 1= 2= 3=i do not work since they do
not eliminate the cross terms.
Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007
PHYS 5326, Spring 2007
Jae Yu
7
Dirac Equation Continued…
It would work if these coefficients are matrices that satisfy the conditions
0 2
1,
1 2
2 2
3 2
n n 0 when n
Or using , n
1
Minkowski n n
metric, gn 2g n
where g n
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 1 0
0 0 0 1
Using gamma matrices with the standard Bjorken and Drell convention
1 0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0 0 0
1 0 0
0 1 0
0 0 1
Where si are Pauli spin matrices
Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007
0 s
i
s 0
i
i
0 1
0 i
1 0
s1
, s 2
, s 3
1
0
i
0
0
1
PHYS 5326, Spring 2007
Jae Yu
8
Dirac Equation Continued…
Using Pauli matrix as components in coefficient matrices whose smallest
size is 4x4, the energy-momentum relation can now be factored
p p m2c2 k pk mc p mc 0
w/ a solution
p mc 0
By applying quantum prescription of momentum p i
Acting the 1-D solution on a wave
k
i mc
function, y, we obtain Dirac equation
y 1
y
where Dirac spinor, y y 2
y 3
y 4
Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007
PHYS 5326, Spring 2007
Jae Yu
y
y 0
9
Euler-Lagrange Equation
For a conservative force, the force can be expressed as
the gradient of the corresponding scalar potential, U
F U
dv
Therefore the Newton’s law can be written m U .
dt
1
Starting from Lagrangian L T U mv 2 U
2
The 1-D Euler-Lagrange fundamental equation of motion
d L
dt q
i
L
qi
Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007
L
In 1D Cartesian
Coordinate system
PHYS 5326, Spring 2007
Jae Yu
dT
mvx
dvx
q1
L
U
q1
x
10
Euler-Lagrange equation in QFT
Unlike particles, field occupies regions of space.
Therefore in field theory, the motion is expressed
in terms of space and time.
Euler-Larange equation for relativistic fields
is, therefore,
Note the four
vector form
Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007
L L
i i
PHYS 5326, Spring 2007
Jae Yu
11
Klein-Gordon Largangian for scalar (S=0) Field
For a single, scalar field , the Lagrangian is
2
1
1 mc 2
L
2
2
Since
L
i and
i
L
mc
i
i
2
From the Euler-Largange equation, we obtain
2
mc
0
This equation is the Klein-Gordon equation describing a
free, scalar particle (spin 0) of mass m.
Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007
PHYS 5326, Spring 2007
Jae Yu
12
Dirac Largangian for Spinor (S=1/2) Field
For a spinor field y, the Lagrangian
L i c y y mc yy
L
Since y
2
0 and L i c y mc 2y
y
From the Euler-Largange equation for `y, we obtain
mc
i y
y 0
Dirac equation for a particle of spin ½ and mass m.
How’s Euler Lagrangian equation looks like for y?
Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007
PHYS 5326, Spring 2007
Jae Yu
13
Proca Largangian for Vector (S=1) Field
Suppose we take the Lagrangian for a vector field A
2
1
1 mc n
n
n
L
A A An n A
A An
16
8
2
1
1
mc
n
F n Fn
A An
16
8
Where Fn is the field strength tensor in relativistic notation, E and B in
Maxwell’s equation form an anti-symmetic second-rank tensor
0 Ex E y Ez
E
0
B
B
x
z
y
n
F
E y Bz
0 Bx
Ez By Bx
0
Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007
PHYS 5326, Spring 2007
Jae Yu
14
Proca Largangian for Vector (S=1) Field
Suppose we take the Lagrangian for a vector field A
2
1
1 mc n
n
n
L
A A An n A
A An
16
8
2
1
1
mc
n
F n Fn
A An
16
8
2
L
1 n n
Since A 4 A A and L 1 mc An
n
A 4
n
From the Euler-Largange equation for A, we obtain
2
2
mc n
mc n
n
A A
A F
A 0
n
n
Proca equation for a particle of spin 1 and mass m.
For
m=0,
for5326,
anSpring
electromagnetic
field.
Wednesday,
Feb. this
28, 2007equation is
PHYS
2007
Jae Yu
15
Lagrangians
• Lagrangians we discussed are concocted to
produce desired field equations
– L derived (L=T-V) in classical mechanics
– L taken as axiomatic in field theory
• The Lagrangian for a particular system is not
unique
– Can always multiply by a constant
– Or add a divergence
– Since these do not affect field equations due to
cancellations
Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007
PHYS 5326, Spring 2007
Jae Yu
16
Homework
• Prove that Fmn can represent Maxwell’s
equations, pg. 225 of Griffith’s book.
• Derive Eq. 11.17 in Griffith’s book
• Due is Wednesday, Mar. 7
Wednesday, Feb. 28, 2007
PHYS 5326, Spring 2007
Jae Yu
17