Chapter 5 PowerPoint
Download
Report
Transcript Chapter 5 PowerPoint
Chapter Five
Wal-Mart’s Anti-Union Strategies
© Routledge 2013
OUR Wal-Mart
© Routledge 2013
Wal-Mart and Unions
© Routledge 2013
Wal-Mart insists they do not need “third
party representation” for their employees
Nationalism and social mobility ladder do not
work for all employees
Some employees want a union, but WalMart has kept them from having one
Managing Labor
Very large gaps between hourly employees
and managers
Everyday Low Cost not just in the supply
chain
© Routledge 2013
2010: Mike Duke earned $18.7 million and
Wal-Mart cut 13,000 jobs
Low-paid workers
Managers minimize costs and are
rewarded for doing so
Interests of hourly workers and managers
are fundamentally at odds
Employee Resistance
Stealing
© Routledge 2013
Wal-Mart has aggressive “Asset
Protection” program
Quitting
Good for Wal-Mart’s bottom line (do not
have to pay increased wages or benefits)
Worked into Wal-Mart’s business model
Bad for other employees (morale and
productivity)
Unions
© Routledge 2013
Western culture prioritizes individual
experience; labor unions promote group
represent the collective interests of
workers
constitute one of the only forms of power
outside the company’s control
the only check on management
prerogatives
Unions exercise power through:
Collective bargaining
Work slowdowns
Boycotts
Strikes
Unions
Contemporary union demands
include
larger share of the company’s
profits
lighter and more realistic
workloads
more predictable schedules
full-time employment
overtime pay
Legislation
National Labor Relations Act
(Wagner Act)
Taft-Hartley Act
© Routledge 2013
Union Busting
Anti-union vs. “pro-associate”
Anti-union indoctrination for new employees
© Routledge 2013
Training videos
Other propaganda
“Manager’s Toolbox”
“Open Door Policy”
“Coaching By Walking Around”
Identifying early warning signs of union
activity
Anti-union hotline in Bentonville
“Early Warning Signs”
© Routledge 2013
increased curiosity in benefits and policies
Associates receiving unusual attention from other associates
Slowdown in work productivity or mistakes
Reports of employee conflict
Increase in complaints and confrontations with management
“Strangers” spending an unusual amount of time in the
associates’ parking areas at the beginning or end of shifts
Associates spending an abnormal amount of time in the
parking lot before and after work
Frequent meetings at associates’ homes
Associates coming back to the facility to talk to associates on
other shifts
Associates leaving work areas on a frequent basis to talk to
other associates
“Final Stages”
Open signs of union activity
© Routledge 2013
Literature
Membership cards
Frank discussions about unions
Union Busting
© Routledge 2013
What happens when a union effort begins in a
store?
Wal-Mart exercises their right to demand an
election
Near daily, quasi-mandatory store meetings
detailing negative aspects of union
organizing
Show anti-union films
“Wall of Shame”
Right to replace striking workers
Fire “troublemakers”
Instances of union formation
Palestine, TX
Jonquière, Canada
Jonquière, Quebec
© Routledge 2013
New Organizing Efforts
OUR Wal-Mart
Leverage the stores principles
(“respect for the individual”)
against them
Challenge company to
recommit to its principles
Warehouse Workers United
(WWU)
Organizing workers in WalMart; contracted warehouses
“Chain of Greed”
© Routledge 2013
Competing Visions of Labor
Rights
© Routledge 2013
People vs. a budget item
A company full of people or a corporate person
“Free” market and level playing field or
structured asymmetry
The questions:
What is the minimum level of benefits that a
working person should enjoy
Should we collectively strive to achieve that
for all workers?
Is believing in that minimum compatible with
shopping at Wal-Mart?
Living Wage campaigns
Reshaping the Political and
Legal Field
© Routledge 2013
Wal-Mart’s anti-union tactics outmaneuver
legal protections for labor
Employee Free Choice Act
Citizens United v. Federal Election
Commission
Is union activity back on the rise?