Transcript document

Get ready for reading quiz
Persuasion &
Propaganda
Get out your W.N. and consider this question:
How is propaganda used to
control/persuade the animals and
their thinking?
While answering this question, make your own
“Propaganda Log” making note of examples of
propaganda used in Animal Farm.
Propaganda Log

Squealer acts as a propaganda tool for the pigs
Page #
What is Said or Done
What is Really Happening
52
Milk & apples are brainfood
Pigs are hogging them
69
Napoleon has lots of
responsibility; respect him
Napoleon conniving, power
hungry
70
Snowball wasn’t important
Napoleon got rid of him
(didn’t want competition for
power)
71-72
Napoleon never opposed the
windmill
Only opposed it because it
was Snowball’s idea; not his
(then he took the credit)
77
Being around people is ok; it
was never really “wrong”
before.
Napoleon is changing the rules
to fit his agenda.
79
Pigs need a quiet place to
work
Don’t sleep in beds “WITH
SHEETS”
Pigs are taking comfort for
themselves
Changing rules to benefit
them.
Snowball is a traitor trying to
betray us
Gives Napoleon someone else
to blame for troubles
80
89
What is persuasion?



An attempt to
change opinions
and attitudes
An attempt to
change your
behavior
EX.: lawyers,
advertisements,
parents
Attempts at Persuasion


Every time you turn on the T.V., open a magazine,
turn on the radio, or surf the web someone is
trying to persuade you to do something
If you are mathematically minded, count the
number of advertisements in a magazine
sometime. (did I persuade you to do it?)
Persuasion vs. Propaganda



Basically, they are both trying to get you to
believe what they believe.
Persuasion is based mainly on a person’s beliefs
and they want you to feel the same way.
Propaganda is based mainly on a group of
peoples beliefs and they are trying to spread
information about their cause. ex.:
advertisements, organizations, politicians
Persuasion vs. Propaganda
(continued)



Persuasion and propaganda both rely on
emotional appeals.
But when emotional appeals ignore logic
or reason, they become a poor
propaganda device.
A good listener can examine a persuasive
statement and identify whether it is logical
or not.
Persuasive/Propaganda Techniques








Euphemism
Oversimplification
Bandwagon
Ad Hominem
Faulty cause-andeffect reasoning
Begging the question
Glittering generalities
Logical fallacies

Euphemism: Attempt to pacify audiences
to make an unpleasant reality more
acceptable; replacing plain English with
deliberately vague jargon to obscure, or
soften the meaning. “not a food reduction
but a readjustment;”

Oversimplification: giving a simple
solution for a complex problem.
Simplification covers the true meaning; “2
wings=2 legs, so birds are four-legged
animals.” “Made from recycled paper” (but
only 10%).

Bandwagon: do something everyone
else is doing; the sheep in Animal Farm
chant “four legs good, two legs bad” over
and over. When environmentalism became
a household word, companies all over the
world suddenly became “green.”

Ad Hominem (name-calling): attacking
the person instead of attacking his
argument. For example, "Von Daniken's
books about ancient astronauts are
worthless because he is a convicted forger
and embezzler." (Which is true, but that's
not why they're worthless.)

Faulty cause-and-effect reasoning: no
logical cause is given or known for the
effect; “Milk and apples are brainfood.”
“Pigs must sleep in beds.” “Brand X
whitens best.”

Begging the question: When the truth
of a statement is assumed before it is
proven. Often, it is avoiding the issue or
real issue by just stating the conclusion in
a different way.

Glittering generalities: is a reverse
form of name-calling. Instead of insults, it
uses words that generate strong positive
emotions-words like "democracy,"
"patriotism," "motherhood," "science,"
"progress," "prosperity." Politicians love to
speak in these terms.

Logical fallacies: Applying logic, one can
usually draw a conclusion from one or
more established premises. While the
premises may be accurate, the conclusion
is not. For example, Premise 1: Bill Clinton
supports gun control. Premise 2:
Communist regimes have always
supported gun control. Conclusion: Bill
Clinton is a communist.
Game Show
Time
Name that
Propaganda
Technique
Euphemism
Oversimplification
Bandwagon
Ad Hominem
Faulty cause-and-effect reasoning
Begging the question
Glittering generalities
Logical fallacies
Name that
Propaganda
Technique
Glittering
Generalities
Euphemism
Oversimplification
Bandwagon
Ad Hominem
Faulty cause-and-effect reasoning
Begging the question
Glittering generalities
Logical fallacies
Name that
Propaganda
Technique
Bandwagon
(everyone
chews their
gum)
Euphemism
Oversimplification
Bandwagon
Ad Hominem
Faulty cause-and-effect reasoning
Begging the question
Glittering generalities
Logical fallacies
Name that
Propaganda
Technique
Ad
Hominem
(attacks
Best Buy)
Euphemism
Oversimplification
Bandwagon
Ad Hominem
Faulty cause-and-effect reasoning
Begging the question
Glittering generalities
Logical fallacies
Name that
Propaganda
Technique
Oversimplification
Euphemism
Oversimplification
Bandwagon
Ad Hominem
Faulty cause-and-effect reasoning
Begging the question
Glittering generalities
Logical fallacies
Name that
Propaganda
Technique
Glittering
Generalities
Euphemism
Oversimplification
Bandwagon
Ad Hominem
Faulty cause-and-effect reasoning
Begging the question
Glittering generalities
Logical fallacies
Name that
Propaganda
Technique
•Faulty Cause
and Effect
Reasoning
Glittering
Generalities
Ad Hominem
Works Cited


Landoll, Sally. “Evaluating a Speaker’s
Reasoning.” Retrieved April 18th, 2006
from http://teachers.usd497.org/slandoll/
New%20Webpage/Persuasion2.ppt
“Retro Junk: Your Memory Machine."
Retrojunk. Retrieved April 18th, 2006 from
http://www.retrojunk.com/.