Types of tooth movement
Download
Report
Transcript Types of tooth movement
In the name of GOD
Biomechanic and types of tooth movement
Presented by:
Dr Somayeh Heidari
Orthodontist
Reference:
Contemporary Orthodontics
Chapter 8
William R. Proffit, Henry W. Fields, David M.Sarver. 2013. Mosby
Definition of terms
Force
a load applied to an object that will tend to move it to a different position
F = m.a
its units are Newtons or gram. Millimeters/ Seconds2
is usually measured in weight units of Grams or ounces
a force is a vector
Line of Action
Origin /
Point of application
Sense / Direction
Resultant
Center of resistance
a point at which resistance to movement can be concentrated
for an object in free space is the same as the center of mass
for a partially restrained object, determined by the nature of the external
constraints
The center of resistance for a tooth is at the approximate midpoint of the embedded
portion of the root: about halfway between the root apex and alveolar bone crest.
Location of the center of resistance depends on the alveolar bone height,
root length , morphology and number of roots.
Moment
a force (F) acting at a distance from the center of resistance (d)
m = F × d (gm-mm)
moment of a force results in some rotational movement
it tends to rotate the object around the center of resistance
it is precisely the situation when a force is applied to the crown of a tooth
F
Distance (d)
M=F×d
Moment of Force
Clinical examples of moments of the forces
Couple
two parallel forces equal in magnitude and opposite in direction
that
separated by a distance
the result is a pure moment
will produce pure rotation around the center of resistance
couple = magnitude of force(s) × distance between forces
M
F
400 g.mm
d
50 g
F
8 mm
M
50 g
Couple force = F × d
Center of rotation
the point around which rotation actually occurs when an object is moved
If a force and a couple are applied to an object, the center of rotation can
be controlled
Types of tooth movement
optimum orthodontic force will stimulate cellular activity without completely
occluding blood vessels in the PDL.
the PDL response is determined not by force magnitude alone, but by force per
unit area, or pressure.
the distribution of force within the PDL differs with different types of tooth
movement
Pressure = Force / Area
Tipping
the crown and the root move in opposite directions
greater movement of the crown than the root
the center of rotation is apical to the center of resistance
based on the location of the center of rotation is classified into uncontrolled and
controlled tipping
Uncontrolled Tipping
the simplest form of orthodontic movement
produced when a single force is applied against the crown
the tooth will rotate during movement
the PDL is compressed near the apex (same side as the force) and at the alveolar
crest (opposite side from the force)
maximum pressure is at the alveolar crest and the root apex
progressively less pressure is created as the center of resistance is approached
only one-half the PDL area is loaded
high pressure in the two areas is concentrated
force must be kept quite low:
not exceed approximately 50 gm
M/F ratio = 0:1 to 5:1
(average root length and 100% alveolar height)
Controlled Tipping
the center of rotation is at the root apex
by application a force to move the crown and a moment to control the apex
concentration of stresses at the alveolar crest
minimal stress at the root apex
M/F ratio = 7:1
Translation
also known as “bodily movement”
the root apex and crown move in the same direction and the same distance
PDL area is loaded uniformly
twice as much force is required for translation
as for tipping
a horizontal force applied at the center of resistance will result in translation
two forces are applied simultaneously (a couple and a force are required)
the center of rotation is at infinity
M/F ratio = 10:1
Rotation
pure rotation requires a couple
no net force acts at the center of resistance
in theory, rotational force can be more larger than other movements
in fact, rotational movement without tipping is essentially impossible
appropriate forces for rotation are similar
to those for tipping
Extrusion
ideally would produce no area of compression in the PDL, only tension
practically the tooth tipped at all while being extruded
even if compressed areas avoided, heavy forces in pure tension would be
undesirable unless for extraction
about the same magnitude of force as those for tipping
Intrusion
successful intrusion can be accomplished, only if very light forces are applied
the force concentration is in a small area at the root apex
the tooth probably will tip somewhat as it is intruded
Root movement
keeping the crown stationary and applying a moment and force to move the root
the center of rotation is at the incisal edge
root movement requires a large moment
concentration of stress is in the apex area
M/F = at or above 12:1
Optimum forces for orthodontic tooth movement
Type of movement
Force* (gm)
Tipping
35-60
Translation
70-120
Root uprighting
50-100
Rotation
35-60
Extrusion
35-60
Intrusion
10-20
*values depend n part on the size of the tooth, smaller values appropriate for incisors,
higher values for multirooted posterior teeth.
Effects of force duration and force decay
animal experiments
clinical experiments
longer force maintenance
after about 4 hours, cyclic nucleotide levels increased
threshold for tooth movement is in the 4-8 hours range
increasingly effective tooth movement
fixed appliances are more effective unless the removable appliance used almost all
the time
Duration of force has another aspect, related to how force magnitude
changes as the tooth responds by moving.
From this perspective, orthodontic force duration is classified by the rate
of decay as:
Continuous – force
Interrupted – force
Intermittent - force
Continuous force
Interrupted force
Intermittent force
theoretically light continuous forces produce the must efficient tooth movement.
the heavier forces are physiologically acceptable only if:
force levels decline so that there is a period of repair and regeneration
before the next activation
or
the force decreases at least to the point that no second and third rounds
of undermining resorption occur
Experiments has shown that orthodontic appliances should not be reactivated
more frequently than at 3 week intervals.
A 4 to 6 week appointment cycle is more typical in clinical practice.
Undermining resorption requires 7 to 14 days : equal or longer period is need
for PDL regeneration and repair before force is applied again.
Thanks for your attention