Transcript Slide 1

The FCLA Endeca Project
By Michele Newberry
Why ENDECA?



Already proven by NCSU
Build on NCSU’s work instead of starting
from zero
Product features:





Guided navigation
Facets
Spellcheck
Stemming
Others yet to be fully explored
M.Newberry
2
Pending upgrade





Jumping 2 releases to v.18
None of the 15.5 customization will
survive the upgrade process
Resource commitment to sustain level of
customization is low
Familiarity with previous system is
declining
Upgrade process will take 4 months for
the 11 Aleph instances
M.Newberry
3
Other objectives



Provide a consistent transition interface
during the upgrade process
Gain discovery and navigation
functionality not currently available
Gain a union catalog – a byproduct of
our previous system not yet available
with the current one
M.Newberry
4
Endeca architecture






One instance of Endeca
One Endeca database
7 million records
One instance of user interface with
individual institution views
Easy interface modification
Rapid, iterative development
M.Newberry
5
Building the Endeca File



Extract bib records with 852 fields
from 11 Aleph databases
Load 1st into 12th Aleph bib file (UX)
Load 2nd file-deduping on OCLC
number – merge unique and local data
(e.g., 852/856/headings/notes…)



Load file3 … file11
Load Digital Library metadata
Extract UX bib file to load into Endeca
M.Newberry
6
Building the Endeca Catalog



Full extraction, reformatting and load
takes 48 hours – will be done every few
weeks
Incremental updates of adds/significant
changes
Current holdings status retrieved from
Aleph via SQL in real-time
M.Newberry
7
Basic Search
M.Newberry
8
Search Results
M.Newberry
9
A Closer Look at Facets
Browse the Virtual Shelf
Advanced Search
M.Newberry
12
Advanced Search
M.Newberry
13
Advanced Search
M.Newberry
14
Advanced Search
M.Newberry
15
Boolean Search
M.Newberry
16
A Closer Look at Results
If item is
requestable,
displays
request link
Create RSS
Feed for any
result set
Item status is
dynamically
displayed
M.Newberry
17
Export Options
M.Newberry
18
Patron Empowerment
M.Newberry
19
Patron Empowerment
Full View with Holdings
M.Newberry
21
Full View with Holdings
M.Newberry
22
MARC View (Union)
M.Newberry
23
MARC View (Local)
M.Newberry
24
Monograph with many Holdings
M.Newberry
25
Monograph Holdings Full View
M.Newberry
26
Monograph Detailed Holdings
Serial with many Holdings
M.Newberry
28
Serial Holdings Full View
29
Serial Detailed Holdings
30
Endeca Record
M.Newberry
31
Endeca Record (large record) …
Endeca Record (large record) …
M.Newberry
33
Endeca Record (large record) …
Endeca Record (large record) …
Endeca Record (large record) …
M.Newberry
36
Next steps …

OPAC Subcommittee is examining






Data integrity
Functionality
Appearance
Usability
Accessibility
CIRC/ILL Subcommittee will be
looking at future SUS-wide request
capabilities
M.Newberry
37
Next steps …

Technical Services Planning
Committee is looking at:



Aleph indexing changes for v.18 and
the effect on Endeca
Examining use of material type codes
for more user-friendly results
Processes to optimize the consistency
of the bibliographic and holdings data
feeding into Endeca
M.Newberry
38
Much further down the road
Technical Services Planning Committee
will be looking at
 Feasibility of sharing bibliographic
records to:




Reduce duplication of effort
Share authority control
Redirect resources into enhancing the
data
Reduce level of effort to produce the
Endeca database
M.Newberry
39
READY … FIRE … AIM!!!

http://catalog.fcla.edu











http://famu.catalog.fcla.edu
http://fau.catalog.fcla.edu
http://fgcu.catalog.fcla.edu
http://fiu.catalog.fcla.edu
http://fsu.catalog.fcla.edu
http://ncf.catalog.fcla.edu
http://ucf.catalog.fcla.edu
http://uf.catalog.fcla.edu
http://unf.catalog.fcla.edu
http://usf.catalog.fcla.edu
http://uwf.catalog.fcla.edu
M.Newberry
40