Presentation 13: From Crisis to Crisis to World War II
Download
Report
Transcript Presentation 13: From Crisis to Crisis to World War II
From crisis to
crisis to World
War II
Europe in 1937
Collective Security in the
Interwar Period
The League of Nations:
• Possibility of sanctions and collective
action against aggressors
France allies with countries
surrounding Germany:
• Poland
• Little entente:
Czechoslovakia,
Romania,
Yugoslavia
UK doubtful: considers this provocative
The spirit of Locarno (1925)
Locarno Pacts:
Work of Gustav Stresemann & Aristide Briand
Signed by France, Belgium, Britain, Germany,
Italy; also Poland, Czechoslovakia
Accept Versailles frontiers & demilitarization
of the Rhine (German territory bordering
France)
Guarantees of non-aggression
Provision for arbitration, mutual assistance
Kellogg-Briand Pact (Pact of Paris,1928)
Signatories ban war as instrument of national
policy
Re-militarization of the Rhine
(1936)
League takes no action
Silently accepted by the British
France,
• preoccupied with internal concerns,
unwilling to take action because
League has not acted
• Rely instead on Maginot Line
Anschluss (1938)
Austria, rump state, deeply divided
Brief civil war, 1934
Austrian Nazis undermine Dollfus gov’t
Germany demands that Seyss-Inquart
(Austrian Nazi leader) becomes chancellor
Seyss-Inquart requests assistance, troops
Austria annexed
Result endorsed in plebiscite
Sudetenland (1938)
Hitler condemns Czechs for allegedly mistreating the
Sudetenland Germans (3 of 13 million)
Demands self-determination for Sudetenland
Neville Chamberlain, UK Prime Minister
• meets with Hitler at Berchtesgaden (15 Sept. 1938)
• gains delay
Czech gov’t concedes self-determination in exchange for
British & French guarantees
Hitler increases demands at Bad Godesberg meeting:
• Immediate annexation of Sudetenland
• Plebiscites in other German-speaking areas
• Polish and Hungarian claims to be met
• Acceptance by Sept. 28th
Czechs reject, mobilize
British and French mobilize
Munich (1938)
Hitler, Mussolini, Chamberlain, Daladier meet on
Sept 29th (Mussolini’s suggestion) europe 1937
Agree that German annexation of Sudetenland,
Oct. 10th
• Plebiscites to be held in other minority areas
• British and French will guarantee new frontiers
Soviet Union offers to aid Czechoslovakia, but
• Poland and Romania object to Soviet troops crossing
Czechs must either accept or fight alone
Slovakia secedes, becomes German satellite
Same fate awaits the Czechs.
• Ruthenia is annexed by Hungary
Chamberlain’s position
Apparent sincere desire
to work with Hitler
Show that ‘legitimate’
claims could be
achieved by diplomacy
Leader of a country
which was neither
ready nor necessarily
willing to fight for a
distant land
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-CAAqfS8lUQ
http://archives.cbc.ca/politics/international_politics/clip
s/7057/
http://www.entertonement.com/clippr/349
Problems with UK position
Hitler not a ‘reasonable’ opponent
Nor necessarily appeased or
appeasable
Munich agreement surrenders
defensible borders
Prague invaded, March 15, 1939
Britain declares guarantees invalid
because Czechoslovakia has
disintegrated
Outbreak of war (1939)
In aftermath,
Britain signs treaties guaranteeing independence
of Poland, Romania, Greece, Turkey
Germany begins making demands on Poland
• increased access across Polish corridor and Danzig
April 6th: UK & France guarantee Polish borders
Germany & USSR sign non-aggression pact:
• interests prevail over ideology
Germany makes further demands
• Invades, Sept. 1st – pretext of fake Polish attack
Britain & France demand withdrawal, declare war
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yENAzd3qesQ
USSR attacks Poland from east, Sept. 17th
http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/euro1942.htm
Some considerations
Absence of effective international institutions
Failure of deterrence:
• Britain and France unable to engage USSR against
Germany:
Problem of Poland
Problem of mutual mistrust
• Fail to enlist Italy against Germany:
Instead German Italian rapprochement from 1936
Pact of Steel. May 22, 1939
Fundamental misperception of German aims by
the British?
Or did anti-Bolshevism prevail?
Differences between WW I & WW II
World War II more of a global conflict
• Fought on two theatres:
Europe and North Africa / Asia/Pacific
More extensive engagement of 20th c technologies
• Role of air power, radar, cryptology
• Mechanized warfare and role of new strategies - blitzkrieg
Greater involvement of civilian populations during & after:
• WWI: borders invented & adjusted but people left in place
• WWII:
With exception of Poland, boundaries stayed broadly
intact
But people were moved.
The term ‘ethnic cleansing’ might not have existed but
the practice certainly did and nobody denounced it.
Staggering losses – 50 million dead
More extensive planning for peace
For discussion:
•
Was this
• one continuous conflict, beginning in
1914, with a pause in between?
• or were these discrete wars?
•
Could World War II have been
avoided?
• If so, when and how?