The Cognitive Revolution: a historical perspective
Download
Report
Transcript The Cognitive Revolution: a historical perspective
THE
COGNITIVE
REVOLUTION:
A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
Asheley Landrum and Amy Louise Schwarz
Behaviorism
Behaviorism
Premise
Psychology as an objective science
Mental events ≠ observable events
Behaviorism
Premise
Psychology as an objective science
Mental events ≠ observable events
Outcome
Perception
= Discrimination
Memory = Learning
Language = Verbal Behavior
Intelligence = What intelligence tests test
Limitations of Behaviorism
It cannot explain a natural language.
Much of human experience is unobservable.
Memory
Decision
making
Perceptual experience
Other mental events
Revolution Begins
“Defining psychology as the science of
behavior is like defining physics as
the science of meter reading.”
– Noam Chomsky
Cognitive Revolution
Cognitive Revolution
Mentalism = Cognition
Integrate mentalistic concepts to explain
behavioral data.
Re-opened
communication with Europe
1956 - Critical Year: Information
Processing (Newell & Simon)
Began Development of Artificial Intelligence
Studies about Thinking
Notions
of Cognitive Strategies
Magic # 7, plus or minus 2
Signal Detection Theory applied to Perception
9/11/56: Moment of Conception
Interdisciplinary Approach
AI
Math
Computer
Science
Language
Neuropsychology
9/11/56: Moment of Conception
Key Papers
“Logic
Machine” (Newell & Simon)
Testing Neuropsychological Theory of Cell Assembly
(Rochester at IBM)
Statistical analysis of gaps in relation to syntax
(Yngve)
Mathematics of Grammar – transformational grammar
(Chomsky)
Speed of Perceptual Recognition (Szikakli)
Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
Created Neuroscience
Created a program: cognitive science
Miller argued: Interdisciplinary field
Report created for the Foundation
Scholars from several fields came together
Unwilling to comment on each other’s disciplines
So, just summarized their own fields
Foundation provided grants to promote
communication between disciplines.
Discussion Questions
Discussion Questions
Psycholinguistics
Discussion Questions
Miller only labeled four of the connections between
fields. What interdisciplinary fields link the
remaining nodes?
What field belongs at the center of the figure?
Discussion Questions
Discussion Questions
Miller contends the central three are:
Psychology,
Linguistics,
and
Computer Science
What is your opinion?
Cognitive Science vs Cognitive Sciences
What are the benefits of thinking of it as a unified
science?
What are the detriments?
Should people from different disciplines comment
regularly on each other’s work?
Artificial Intelligence
Do you think it is possible to advance
artificial intelligence to the point
where it accurately mimics life?
Are there any aspects of human
cognition that you believe are unable
to be replicated?
Discussion Questions
This article is a personal account
of the cognitive revolution.
What is added or taken away
by this being a personal account
as opposed to a historical
perspective as the title
suggests?
Discussion Questions
How did the invention of the computer contribute to
the perception of cognitive science?