230-Evolution III
Download
Report
Transcript 230-Evolution III
Bio. 230 --- Evolution III
Some History of Evolutionary Thought
Empedocles (Greek, ~490 to 430 B.C.)
1st to propose a clear concept of biological
evolution
Abiogenesis
Plants arose 1st; their buds gave rise to animals
Gradual process
Some History of Evolutionary Thought
Aristotle (Greek, 384-348 B.C.), student of
Plato (~427-347 B.C.)
Similar ideas
Abiogenesis
Acquired characteristics
Species could hybridize
Some History of Evolutionary Thought
Lamarck (French, 1744-1829)
1st in more modern times to put forth a
comprehensive & logical evolutionary theory
Acquired characteristics
Pangenesis / pangenes
Newer forms were more complex (and
“perfect”) than their ancestors
Some History of Evolutionary Thought
Charles Darwin (English, 1809-1882)
Started out as a special creationist
READ handout: “A comparison of views on
variation and heredity”
1831-1836 --- voyage on the Beagle
Then worked for more than 20 years
1838 – He read AN ESSAY ON THE PRINCIPLE OF
POPULATION by Thomas Malthus
Natural Selection
Some History of Evolutionary Thought
Charles Darwin (English, 1809-1882)
1844 -- Put together a brief essay (unpublished)
Early 1858 – Essay from Alfred Russel Wallace
Later 1858 – Published Wallace’s essay and
excerpts from his own 1844 essay in the
Journal of the Linnaean Society
1859 – published THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES BY
MEANS OF NATURAL SELECTION
Darwin’s Main Points
1) Overproduction of offspring
2) Variation within a species and at least some
of it is hereditary
3) Limits on resources; engenders a struggle
for existence
4) Generally the fittest survive
(= Natural Selection)
5) Eliminating of unfavorable traits and
accumulation of more favorable traits
gives rise to new forms of life
NeoDarwinism or The Modern Synthetic Theory
Darwin did not have all the answers
1937 – Theodosius Dobzhansky (Genetics and
the Origin of Species) began the MST
1950s to 1970s additional seminal work
C. Leo Babcock (plant evolution),
Edgar Anderson (Introgressive Hybridization),
Earnst Mayr (animal evolution),
G. L. Stebbins (plant evolution),
J. Watson & F. Crick (DNA structure),
M. Nirenberg & J. H. Matthaei (genetic code)
Evolutionary Potpourri
Evolution occurs in POPULATIONS*
Populations can have a change in gene / allele frequency
All populations are phenotypically polymorphic
New gene / allele combinations can come about from
CROSSINGOVER and RECOMBINATION during sexual
reproduction
New alleles / genes come about by some type of MUTATION
Microevolution* vs. Macroevolution*
Are the processes that drive each different?
Gradualism vs. Punctuated Equilibrium*
Are the processes that drive each different?
The Gene Pool (I)
DEFINITION* -- ALL of the genes AND alleles in a
population taking into account their frequency
It is the total supply of genetic units available to
form the next generation
Not possible to study the whole gene pool
Will look at a “mini” gene pool (for the gene “A”)
Only two alleles: A and a
3 possible genotypes (AA, Aa, aa)
We start a population with a certain frequency
of A and a
The Gene Pool (II)
What will happen to the allele (and genotype)
frequencies over the generations??????????
Solved independently in early 20th century by:
George Hardy & Wilhelm Weinberg
Known by various aliases:
Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium
Hardy-Weinberg Theorem
Hardy-Weinberg Law
Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium
DEFINITION* -- Given certain conditions the
allele frequencies remain constant from
generation to generation AND after one
generation of random mating even the
genotype frequencies will remain constant
and can be predicted from the equation
(p + q)2 = p2 + 2pq + q2
p = the frequency (f) of A
q = the frequency (f) of a
p2 = f AA, 2pq = f Aa, q2 = f aa
Hardy-Weinberg Conditions (I)
Infinitely large Population
Eliminates chance fluctuations (genetic drift)
Random Mating
Means no inbreeding; no positive (+) or
negative (-) assortative mating
No net mutation
Eliminates mutation pressure
No net population movement
Eliminates net gene flow
Hardy-Weinberg Conditions (II)
No natural selection
Means no type is better than another; all
types must survive at proportional rates
----------------------------------------------------------------“Survival of the Fittest” does not mean that
organisms fight or that organism have to die
Death (real) vs. Genetic Death
Natural Selection works on PHENOTYPE
Genetic Drift
A change in the allele frequencies in
a gene pool due to random (chance) events
More likely to happen in small populations
OR when a small sample is taken from a large
population
Due to random sampling in a less than infinite
population
Genetic Drift
Genetic Drift / Bottlenecking / Founder Effect
Some Species Concepts
Many concepts; none are ‘perfect’
Morphospecies (= typological sp.)
Biological species (= reproductive sp.)
(E. Mayr)
Phenetic species
Ecospecies
Phylogenetic species
Phyletic Speciation (Anagenesis)
Number of extant
species does not
increase
Divergent Speciation (Dichotomous speciation
or Cladogenesis)
Number of extant species increases
Isolating Mechanisms
See handout
Autopolyploidy (Fig. 24.10) ???????????
Allopolyploidy (Fig. 24.11) ???????????
Allopolyploidy (MOST likely)
(2 pathways --- many examples)
(Primula kewensis and Tragopogon mirus)