Transcript maxim

Webster Cash
University of Colorado
MAXIM
Galaxies
Clusters of
Galaxies
22
Star
Clusters
20
SNR
18
Log Diameter (cm)
AGN
Jets
16
AGN BLR
Sne
14
Interacting
Binaries
12
AGN
Event
Horizons
XRB
Orbits
Stellar Coronae
10
GRB
Afterglow
CV
XRB Disks
8
6
NS Disks
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Log Distance (pc)
7
8
9
10
Capella 0.0001”
Capella 0.000001”
AR Lac
Simulation @ 100mas
AGN Accretion Disk
Simulations @ 0.1mas
Courtesy of Phil Armitage, U. Colorado and C. Reynolds, U. Maryland
Need Resolution and Signal
If we are going to do this, we need to support
two basic capabilities:
• Signal
• Resolution
X-ray Sources Are Super Bright
Example:
Mass Transfer Binary
1037ergs/s from 109cm object
That is ~10,000L from 10-4A = 108 B
where B is the solar brightness in ergs/cm2/s/steradian
Brightness is a conserved quantity and is the measure of visibility
for a resolved object
Note: Optically thin x-ray sources can have
very low brightness and are inappropriate
targets for interferometry.
Same is true in all parts of spectrum!
Artist’s impression of Cyg X-1 (NASA)
My Impression
Status of X-ray Optics
• Modest Resolution
– 0.5 arcsec telescopes
– 0.5 micron microscopes
• Severe Scatter Problem
– Mid-Frequency Ripple
• Extreme Cost
– Millions of Dollars Each
– Years to Fabricate
Pathlength Tolerance Analysis at Grazing Incidence
A1
B1 
sin 
B2  B1cos2 
A2
OPD  B1  B 2 



B1
A1 & A2 in Phase Here
B2

 1  cos2 
 2 sin 
sin 
If OPD to be < /10 then  

20 sin 

C
d Baseline  
S2
S1

d  focal  

20 sin  cos

20 sin 2 
A Simple X-ray Interferometer
Flats
Detector
Wavefront Interference
=s (where s is fringe spacing)
s
d/L
L
s
d
Optics
Each Mirror Was Adjustable
From Outside Vacuum
System was covered by thermal shroud
X-ray Fringes
0.5keV
Gendreau, October 2002
1.25keV
Cash et al March 1999
Flats Held in Phase
Sample Many Frequencies
As More Flats Are Used
Pattern Approaches Image
2
12
4
8
16
32
Periscope Configuration
Keeps beam pointed
in constant direction
like thin lens
To focus

Parallel to Source Direction
Reduces Sensitivity to Baseline
Each Periscope in the array is held to /20sin  10m
Periscopes allow for delay in each
channel. Can sample full UV plane.
focus
Periscope Requirements
• Even Number of Reflections
With odd number of
reflections, beam direction shifts
with mirror tilt
With even number, the mirrors
compensate and beam travels in same
direction.
Phase Shift

h
Path Delay = h sin
so h  <  /10 for phase stability
if h~1cm then  < 10-8 (2 milli-arcsec)
This can be done, but it’s not easy.
Phase Delay
d2
d1
P  d1 (cos   cos  sec22  21   sin  cot 2  sin  sec(22  21 )cot 1  cos 21 (cot 1  cot 2 )
 d 2 (cos  2  cos  2 sec2 4  23   sin  2 cot  4  sin  2 sec(2 4  23 )cot 3  cos 23 (cot 3  cot  4 ) 
There are Solutions
This solution can be direction and phase invariant
Dennis Gallagher has verified this by raytrace!
Pointing can wander arcseconds, even arcminutes, and beam
holds fixed!
Array Pointing
• 4 mirror periscopes solve problem of mirror
stability
• But what about array pointing?
• Doesn’t the array have to be stable to 1mas
if we are to image to 1mas?
Thin Lens Behavior
As a thin lens wobbles, the image in space does not move
Position on the detector changes only because the detector moves
Formation Flying
If detector is on a separate craft, then a wobble in
the lens has no effect on the image.
But motion of detector relative to Line of Sight (red) does!
Much easier than stabilizing array.
Still the toughest nut for full Maxim.
Variety of solutions under development.
Mirror FEM
Mirror Face
Mirror Back
3pt Ti Flexure Mount
Optic w/Face
Sheet Removed
Mirror Analysis Summary
Analysis
Goal/Req.
Result
Comments
o
min surface deformation PtoV=6.2nm, RMS=1.2nm
o
min surface deformation PtoV=3.2nm, RMS=0.6nm
Gradient across mirror surface
o
min surface deformation PtoV=3.1nm, RMS=0.6nm
Gradient across mirror surface
o
min surface deformation
FF > 100 Hz
Mount Stress < Yield
Low Mirror Stress
Gradient through mirror thickness
Mirror on flexures, but not entire mount
20g Y Loading
20g Y Loading
1 c Bulk Temp Load
1 c X Gradient
1 c Y Gradient
1 c Z Gradient
Fixed Base Dynamics
20g Quasi Static Load
20g Quasi Static Load
1cZ Mirror Deformations (mm)
PtoV=17.0nm, RMS=3.8nm
FF=278 Hz
35 MPa maximum
7.6MPa maximum
20gY Mirror Back Stresses (MPa)
Mirror First Mode = 278 Hz
MAXIM Position Tolerances
=1nm, F=20,000km, D=1km, m=30cm, =1deg, h=1mm
DOF
X
Y
Z


20 3 sin(  ) cos( )
m sin(  )

10 3
Z-rot
(roll)


 cos( 2 )

20 3 sin 2 ( )

X-rot
(yaw)
Y-rot
(pitch)
Periscope
Equation
Mirror Equation
5D
m sin(  )
10
4F2

5D 2
sin(  )
5 3

2
2
  m sin    
1 


 
 
 
3  10m sin     10 F  


1

3 sin  
F

  m sin   


  



10
m
sin

10
F


 
2

2

sin(  )
15

20h
2F
5D 2
Mirror
Tolerance
Periscope
Tolerance
±1.7nm
±4mm
±0.3mm
± 0.5mm
±94.7nm
±0.32m
±6.9
arcmin
± 7.8
arcmin
±2.3
marcsec
± 10
arcsec
±0.13
arcsec
±18.5
arcsec
Optical Bench FEM
“Daughter” Benches
Main Bench
Flexure
Fixed Mount
Simplified Optics Mounts
Periscope Assembly
Assy. Kinematic Mounts (3)
Entrance Aperture
(Thermal Collimator)
Shutter Mechanism
(one for each aperture)
Launch Configuration Layout
Delta IV ø5m x L14.3m
24 Free Flyer Satellites (4 Apertures ea.)
1 Hub Satellite (12 Apertures)
1 Detector Satellite
Ø4.75m
Aperture Locations (central area)
18
13
14
12
7
6
1
26
5
4
11
10
17
16
8
2
3
9
15
On the left is the probability distribution function for two sources in the same
field of view. The central source has an energy half that of the source that is
displaced to the lower left. The image on the right shows 9000 total events for
this system with the lower energy source having twice the intensity of the higher
energy source. Even though the higher energy source is in the first maxima of
the other, the two can still be easily distinguished.
Stars
Simulation with Interferometer
Sun with SOHO
The Beyond Einstein Program
optical imaging
Hubble
LISA
Dark Energy
Probe
LIGO
dark energy physics
space interferometry,
gravitational wave detection
gravitational
wave
detectors
space interferometry
MAP
microwave background detection
Inflation
Probe
Big Bang
Observer
dark matter
physics
Constellation-X
Chandra
black hole physics
Black hole
imager
x-ray imaging
hard x-ray detectors
Swift
Science and Technology Precursors
Black Hole
Survey
Probe
black hole census
Bottom Line
• Maxim can be built in an affordable way
• Achieving 0.1mas can be done with modest
control in free-flying
• Full black hole imaging for under $900M
• Maxim is in the planning
• NRA for “Vision Mission Studies” coming
out this week.