Pol. positron geneation scheme for ILC

Download Report

Transcript Pol. positron geneation scheme for ILC

Pol. positron generation scheme
KEK Junji Urakawa
for ILC
2005.6.21, at RHU
1. Summary of Compton Scattering
2.
3.
4.
5.
Experiment for Pol. Positron
generation at ATF
Scheme for ILC positron generation
How to get enough positron yield.
How to generate ILC positron beam.
Conclusion
High Pol. Beam Generation, Low Cost Beam
Source, Flexible Beam Source Tuning
But, there are many challenges.
~100MeV Accumulator Ring
To 5GeV Ring
Pol. positron
To 5GeV Ring
1.3GeV S-band Linac
180m Laser-Compton Ring
~100MeV Accumulator Ring
Pol. electron
Almost 100% Pol. g-ray
to about 90% ~
4
10
7
10
+
e
Experiment@KEK-ATF
i) proof-of-principle demonstrations
ii) accumulate technical informations:
polarimetry, beam diagnosis, …
Accelerator Test Facility@KEK
120 m
Measured Number of g-rays
Ng = 2.1x107/bunch in 31 p sec
Measured Asymmetry
A= -0.93±0.15 %
A= 1.18± 0.15 %
laser pol. = - 79 %
laser pol. = + 79 %
This is old data obtained by old laser. Now we measured almost 100% Pol. g-ray
by new Laser.
Pol. g-ray Production
Ng ≈ 1 x 107 /bunch
DT(rms) = 31 psec
Pol. : g = ~100 % (measure Eg > 50 MeV?)
Pol.
+
e
Production
Ng = 2 x 107 /bunch
Ne+ = 6 x 104/bunch? (Ee+ = 25 to 45 MeV)
Pol. e+ = 77 %----~90%?
DT(rms) = 31 psec
Can NOT measure each e+
Polarimetry ?
Measure e+ polarization :
use Bremsstrahlung g-ray
g-ray
polarized e+
Pb conveter
Scheme for ILC positron generation
• S-band Linac with Multi-bunch Photo-Cathode
RF Gun to generate 200 bunch train. (Norm.
emittance<5x10-6 mrad)
• Small Ring for Laser Compton Scattering
• Collimation of g-ray , Target, Separator
• Pre-acceleration to positron storage (collector)
ring
• S-band Linac to accelerate 200 bunch train
upto energy of 3km damping ring.
Multi-bunch electron beam generation with
2.8nsec bunch spacing
200 bunches/train 12.5Hz operation is possible.
940 mJ/100 pulses with 2.8nsec spacing,
UV 266nm, 7psec(FWHM)
Farady Cup to measure multi-bunch
Current, 400nC/100 bunches
Small Ring for Laser Compton
Scattering
• 185.16m (=199x2.8ns+60ns) small ring with two 50
•
•
•
•
m long straight sections for laser Compton
scattering and beam inj./ext. & RF acceleration.
Racetrack ring.
Many IP’s are possible with one target.
12.5Hz fast kicker with flat-top 300ns and rise/fall
time<60ns is manufactured by SLAC.-maybe
600nsec flat-top possible.
50% operation of this ring will be devoted to Pol.
positron generation.
Other 50% is for use as g-factory or pol. positron
and electron application.
Collimation of g-ray , Target, Separator
• We need good design as total system. Thermal
•
•
•
effect is not severe comparing the undulator
scheme.
Since the design is not difficult, I only say you
should learn ATF pol. positron setup as not good
example in which we want to tight selection of pol.
Positron and the total system for the undulator
scheme from TESLA TDR.
Anyway, we can obtain pol. ~90% positrons which
corresponds to 0.1% of g-yield in the range from
0.9 max. energy to max. energy g as number of
positrons.
Max. g energy is important parameter.
Pre-acceleration to positron storage
(collector) ring
• Pre-acceleration from about 10MeV to 100MeV are
•
•
•
•
•
necessary by DC super conducting linac (RF frequency is
maybe 714MHz or more.). DC super-conducting Linac is
necessary to boost the energy of 9x103 positrons/bunch
beam upto the energy of the accumulator ring.
I donot take care of de-polarization at present.
Very Fast Multi-turn Injection to accumulate positron
beam.
I can use very fast kicker and synchrotron tune resonant
injection. Accumulator ring has to accept large
synchrotron oscillation. Bunch length of injected positron
beam is very small, 10psec (rms). RF acceleration system of
the accumulator ring is 357MHz.
Laser induced radiation cooling is helpful.
What energy of the accumulator ring is optimum?
Very Fast Kicker Experiment for this scheme
and 3km damping ring (strip line kicker)
3MHz operation is OK. 2.8nsec bunch spacing beam with 60nsec train gap will
be extracted stably but 357MHz injection is problem which requests Fourier
Series kicker under development by my group.
How to get enough positron yield.
• Recalculation with electron energy of 1.28GeV,
•
•
•
•
See Klaus Monig-san’s report.
Collimated g-ray energy range: 25.6-28.5MeV
6.2x1015 photons/sec per IP, need 6 IP’s
Pulse energy 20mJ is OK. If we make 30
IP’s,we have to produce 20mJ with 357MHz.
42cm Optical Cavity with mode-lock laser
Experimental results(Pulse Laser Storage)
Laser:
Mode Lock: Passive
SESAM
Frequency:
357MHz
Cavity length:
0.42 m
Pulse width: 7.3 p sec
(FWHM)
Wave Length:
1064 nm
Power:
~ 6W
SESAM: SEmi-conductor Saturable Absorber Mirrors
Ext. Cavity:
Cavity:
Cavity length:
Mirrors:
Reflectivity:
Curvature:
Super Invar
0.42 m
99.7%, 99.9%
250 mm (ω0 = 180μm)
super invar
62φ
・Finesse: R = 99.9%
Finesse =πτc/l
PD
PBS
PBS
τ:decay time
c: light verocity
l: cavity length
P.C.
Trans.
τ~ 3.0μsec
F ~ 6300
(Preliminary)
More than 3000
Times.
Plused Laser and Electron Beam Collision to measure
bunch length
Pulse Laser Wire
(Storage laser pulses in optical cavity ) :
New Project by JSPS from 2005 to
2009
To make 1mm(rms) focusing at IP with small crossing angle.
7 % energy acceptance small ring(16m).
Test ring for positron collection from ATF=DR Laser Compton
How to generate ILC positron beam.
• We already demonstrate very fast strip-line
kicker with 3MHz repetition rate.
• 3km damping ring was designed with train gap.
• There are many instability issues to solve in
this design but the damping time is short.
• I already mentioned the scheme at 1st ILC
workshop.
Beam Injection/ Extraction Schemes
Train gap is necessary to cure fast ion instability.
Design of Storage Ring
Example, Large acceptance
Energy [GeV]
Number of bunches
Circumference [m]
Natural emittance [nm]
Horizontal emittance (Full C.)[nm]
Vertical emittance (Full C.) [nm]
Momentum compaction
RF frequency [MHz]
Rms energy spread
Natural Bunch Length [mm]
1.98-1.3
340-200
299.792-185
0.5-0.22
0.25-0.11
0.25-0.11
1.388x10-3
714
0.0975%-?
5.49-3.0?
Conclusion
• My conclusion is almost same as Klaus’s talk.
• Necessary Devices R&D’s are on going.
Thank you.