Transcript Motivation

Massively parallel manipulation of single cells
and microparticles using optical images
Pei Yu Chiou, Aaron T. Ohta & Ming C. Wu
Nature, Vol. 436, 370-372, 2005
Ayca Yalcin
 Motivation: Need for ability to manipulate
cells and particles with high resolution and
high throughput for biological and colloidal
science applications.
 Proposed Method: Optical image driven
dielectrophoresis.
OUTLINE








Optical tweezers and dielectrophoresis
Xerography
Optoelectronic tweezers (OET)
Device structure
Demonstration of throughput and resolution
Comparison to other techniques
Previous work
Conclusion
Optical Tweezers
 Tightly focused beam traps
particles.
 Intensity gradients in converging
beam draw particles toward focus.
 Radiation pressure pushes
particles away, down the optical
axis.
 Particle can be trapped if
gradient force dominates.
 High resolution for trapping
single particles, but limited
manipulation area.
Dielectrophoresis
 Total electric force acting on a particle of net charge in a non-uniform field:
 If Q = 0, or f>1 kHz, where electrophoretic
effects are negligible, the time-averaged force
is given by:
 The magnitude of the force depends on the
electric field gradient and the polarizability of the
particle, thus dielectric properties of the particle
and the surrounding medium.
Xerography
In this 1965 photo, Carlson enacts his 1938
experiment in which he wrote "10-22-38
ASTORIA" with india ink on a glass slide. The
room was darkened and a zinc plate,
covered with sulphur, was rubbed vigorously
with a handkerchief to apply an electrostatic
charge. He put the slide on the plate,
exposed it to light for a few seconds,
removed the slide and sprinkled lycopodium
powder on the plate. He gently blew off the
loose powder and what remained was the
first electrophotographic copy. After Xerox
became very successful, Carlson was
showered with honors and wealth. In 1968,
he died of a stroke on a street in New York.
(Image courtesy of Xerox Corporation.)
Optoelectronic Tweezers (OET)
 Advantages of OET:
• the optical power reduced because of the gain in
photoconductors. (1uW to move a 25um latex bead at
4.5um/s)
• tight optical focusing is not required. The trapping area
can be tailored to match the cell size.
Device Structure
 10V peak-to-peak a.c.
 625nm, 1mW LED
 DMD: 1024x768 pixels
13.68x13.68um
 Electrode: 1.52um
 1mW  40,000 pixels
 Dark conductivity of 10-8 S/cm to
10-10 S/cm.
 50nm doped a-Si:H
 1um undoped a-Si:H
 2nm Silicon Nitride
Device structure, continued…
 Without illumination, most voltage drops
across a-Si layer, because its impedance is
much higher than the liquid layer.
 Under optical illumination, the conductivity of
a-Si increases by several orders of
magnitude, shifting voltage drop to the liquid
layer.
 Light-induced virtual electrode creates a nonuniform electric field, and the resulting DEP
forces drive the particles of interest.
 DEP force can be positive or negative,
controlled by the frequency of the applied ac
signal.
 Negative DEP force repels particles away from
the high field region (preferable for single
particle cage, light wall around particle)
 Positive DEP attracts multiple particles.
High resolution
15,000 DEP traps across an area of 1.3 x 1.0mm2. Size of each trap is
optimized to capture a single 4.5-um-diameter polystyrene bead, real time.
Small particle trapping
 DEP force induced by the LED source unable to overcome the Brownian
motion of beads <1 μm.
 Another light induced ac electrokinetic method used to successfully
trap 1-μm-diameter beads.
 This is not DEP-based, at a low applied AC frequency (~ 1 kHz), the
optical pattern induces flow patterns in the liquid medium, trapping the
1-μm particles at the center of the light spots.
Continuous particle manipulation
Negative OET used on polystyrene beads with diameters of 10 μm, 13 μm, and
24 μm, time scale compressed by a factor of three.
Live-dead cell sorting




Selective concentration of live human B cells (lymphocytes) by positive OET.
Dead cells, dark blue, experience a negative OET force and are not collected.
A population of live cells, clear, is concentrated in the center of the pattern.
Time scale compressed by a factor of eight.
Comparison
 Optical tweezers require very high optical power (mW’s), and have
limited working area due to the need of tight focusing with high
numerical aperture (N.A.) lenses.
 On the other hand, dielectrophoresis (DEP) has high throughput
and large working area, but requires a fixed electrode pattern.
Programmable DEP cage array consisting of two-dimensional
electrodes with integrated driving circuits on CMOS  Parallel
manipulation of 10,000 cells.
 Two potential drawbacks:
• The need of on-chip integrated circuits high cost
• The trap density (400 sites/mm2) limited by the size of control circuits
 100,000x lower optical intensity required for virtual diode turn on,
500x larger manipulation area.
 Light-patterned electrodes, 30x higher trap density.
Microvision-Activated Automatic Optical
Manipulator for Microscopic Particles
 The system automatically recognizes
positions and sizes of randomly
distributed particles and creates
direct image patterns to trap and
transport the selected particles.
(Particle recognition using a darkpixel recognition algorithm )
 By integrating the OET with a
programmable DMD, able to generate
0.8 million pixels of virtual electrodes
over an effective area of 1.3 mm × 1
mm.
 Each virtual electrode is individually
controllable for parallel manipulation
of a large number of microscopic
particles.
 Increases the functionality and
reduces the processing time for
microparticle manipulation.
Conclusion
 Multiple manipulation functions combined
to achieve complex, multi-step
manipulation protocols.
 Single cell analysis  spectrum of
response of each individual cell.