Transcript Classification Rules for Growth Ratings and Scores

NYS Grades 4-8 Teacher Growth Scores:
From MGP to HEDI Ratings and Scores
2015-16
August 2016
Disclaimer
If there are any discrepancies between the language in these materials and the Statute, Regulations, or
APPR Guidance, the Statute, Regulations, or APPR Guidance prevail.
1
www.engageNY.org
How is MGP Classified into 3012-c Growth Rating for
Teachers of Grades 4-8 in 2015-16?
MGP
MGP ≥ 1.5 SD above mean
(MGPs of 67 or higher)
MGP > 1 SD below mean
and
Confidence Range
Yes
Lower Limit > Mean
Growth Rating
Highly Effective
Yes
(Lower Limit > 51)
Effective
Yes
Any
Yes
Yes
Upper Limit < Mean
Yes
MGP < 1.5 SD above mean
(MGPs of 41 thru 66)
MGP > 1.5 SD below mean
and
(MGPs of 35 thru 40)
Yes
(MGPs of 34 or lower)
Upper Limit (< .75 SD
below mean)
(Upper Limit < 43)
Notes: SD = Standard Deviation
Values are rounded to the nearest whole number.
2
www.engageNY.org
Equal to state average for
similar students
(9-17 points)
Developing
(Upper Limit < 51)
MGP ≤ 1 SD below mean
MGP ≤ 1.5 SD below mean
Well above state average
for similar students
(18-20 points)
Below average for similar
students
(3-8 points)
Ineffective
Yes
Well below average for
similar students
(0-2 points)
How are 3012-c Growth Score Points* for Teachers Assigned in
2015-16?
HEDI Points*
Min MGP
Max MGP
Ineffective
0
8
27
Well below average for
similar students
(0-2 points)
1
28
30
2
31
34
3
28
34
Developing
4
35
35
5
36
36
6
37
37
7
38
39
8
40
40
9
35
42
10
43
45
11
46
47
12
48
50
13
51
52
14
53
54
15
55
57
16
58
61
17
62
67
18
67
68
19
69
72
20
73
98
Below average for
similar students
(3-8 points)
Effective
Equal to state average
for similar students
(9-17 points)
Highly Effective
Well above state average
for similar students
(18-20 points)
Point value of 3 includes
teachers with MGPs in the
Ineffective category but
confidence ranges of 43 or
above
Point value of 9 includes
teachers with MGPs in the
Developing category but
confidence ranges above
state average
Point value of 17 includes
teachers with MGPs in the
Highly Effective category but
confidence ranges below
state average
* Based on the arguments presented in the NYC arbitration proceeding held on May 30 and 31, 2013 and pursuant to his authority in Education Law §3012-c(2)(a), the Commissioner imposed new proportional scoring ranges for
use in NYC for the 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16 and 2016-17 school years. Please see the following link for a description of these scoring ranges: http://usny.nysed.gov/rttt/teachers-leaders/plans/docs/new-york-city/new-york-cityappr-plan-060113.pdf.
3
www.engageNY.org
How is MGP Classified into 3012-d Growth Rating for
Teachers of Grades 4-8 in 2015-16?
MGP
MGP ≥ 1.5 SD above mean
(MGPs of 67 or higher)
MGP > 1 SD below mean
and
Confidence Range
Yes
Lower Limit > Mean
Growth Rating
Highly Effective
Yes
(Lower Limit > 51)
Effective
Yes
Any
Yes
Yes
Upper Limit < Mean
Yes
MGP < 1.5 SD above mean
(MGPs of 41 thru 66)
MGP > 1.5 SD below mean
and
(MGPs of 35 thru 40)
Yes
(MGPs of 34 or lower)
Upper Limit (< .75 SD
below mean)
(Upper Limit < 43)
Notes: SD = Standard Deviation
Values are rounded to the nearest whole number.
4
www.engageNY.org
Equal to state average for
similar students
(15-17 points)
Developing
(Upper Limit < 51)
MGP ≤ 1 SD below mean
MGP ≤ 1.5 SD below mean
Well above state average
for similar students
(18-20 points)
Below average for similar
students
(13-14 points)
Ineffective
Yes
Well below average for
similar students
(0-12 points)
How are 3012-d Growth Score Points* for Teachers Assigned in
2015-16?
HEDI Points*
Min MGP
Max MGP
0
8
22
1
23
23
2
24
24
3
25
25
Ineffective
4
26
26
Well below average for
similar students
(0-12 points)
5
27
27
6
28
28
7
29
29
8
30
30
9
31
31
10
32
32
Developing
11
33
33
Below average for similar
students
(13-14 points)
12
34
34
13
28
36
Effective
14
37
40
Equal to state average for
similar students
15
35
47
16
48
54
(15-17 points)
17
55
67
Highly Effective
18
67
68
Well above state average
for similar students
19
69
72
20
73
98
(18-20 points)
5
www.engageNY.org
Point value of 13 includes
teachers with MGPs in the
Ineffective category but
confidence ranges of 43 or
above
Point value of 15 includes
teachers with MGPs in the
Developing category but
confidence ranges above state
average
Point value of 17 includes
teachers with MGPs in the
Highly Effective category but
confidence ranges below state
average