p - Saed Dababneh
Download
Report
Transcript p - Saed Dababneh
Counting Statistics and Error Prediction
Poisson Distribution (p << 1)
• Low cross section.
Appendix C
• Weak resonance.
• Short measurement (compared to t1/2).
Success ≡ Birthday today.
p = 1/365.
n = 1000.
HW 25
x pn
x x
pn e
x e
P( x)
x!
n
P( x) 1
x 0
x!
We need to
know only the
product.
n
x xP( x) pn
x 0
n
2 x x 2 P( x) pn x
x 0
Radiation Detection and Measurement, JU, First Semester, 2010-2011
(Saed Dababneh).
1
Counting Statistics and Error Prediction
Gaussian (Normal) Distribution (p << 1,
1
P( x)
e
2x
x > 20)
x x 2
2x
n
P( x) 1
Success ≡ Birthday today.
p = 1/365.
n = 10000.
HW 26
x 0
n
x xP( x) pn
x 0
n
2 x x 2 P( x) pn x
x 0
• Can be expressed as a function of .
• Can be expressed in a continuous form.
Radiation Detection and Measurement, JU, First Semester, 2010-2011
(Saed Dababneh).
2
Counting Statistics and Error Prediction
P( x)
1
e
2x
x x 2
2x
2
2 2x
G ( )
e
x
Radiation Detection and Measurement, JU, First Semester, 2010-2011
(Saed Dababneh).
3
Counting Statistics and Error Prediction
Calculate the percentage of the
samples that will deviate from the
mean by less than:
• one .
HW 27
• two .
• etc …
Radiation Detection and Measurement, JU, First Semester, 2010-2011
(Saed Dababneh).
4
Counting Statistics and Error Prediction
P( x)
y y0
Baseline
offset
1
e
2x
2x
A
w
x x 2
e
Total area under the
curve above the baseline
2 ( x x0 ) 2
w2
2
HW 28
2, approximately 0.849 the
width of the peak at half height
This model describes a bell-shaped curve like the normal (Gaussian)
probability distribution function. The center x0 represents the "mean", while
½ w is the standard deviation.
What is FWHM? Resolution? Peak centroid?
Radiation Detection and Measurement, JU, First Semester, 2010-2011
(Saed Dababneh).
5
Counting Statistics and Error Prediction
Applications 1- Match experiment to model
•
•
•
Assume a specific
distribution (Poisson,
Gaussian).
Set distribution mean to
be equal to experimental
mean.
Compare variance to
determine if distribution
is valid for actual data set
(Chi-squared test).
1
s
N
2
x xe (all what we need)
xe xF ( x)
x 0
N
(x x )
i 1
i
2
e
and not
1 N
s
( xi xe ) 2
N 1 i 1
2
because we set x xe
Radiation Detection and Measurement, JU, First Semester, 2010-2011
(Saed Dababneh).
6
Counting Statistics and Error Prediction
Back to our example
• We can’t use Gaussian
model for this data set.
Why?
• Qualitative comparison.
• Is 2 close to s2?
1
s
N
2
N
(x x)
i 1
i
2
7.36
Only to guide
the eye!
HW 29
2 x 8 .8
• Close!? Less fluctuation
than predicted!
• But quantitatively?
• Chi-squared test.
Radiation Detection and Measurement, JU, First Semester, 2010-2011
(Saed Dababneh).
7
Counting Statistics and Error Prediction
Chi-squared
By definition:
Thus:
or
1
xe
2
N
x x
i 1
2
i
e
2
2
N
1
s
N
1
s
2
xe
2
N 1
2
19 7.36
15
.
891
8.8
s2
2
The degree to which 2 differs from (N-1) is a measure of the departure of the
data from predictions of the distribution.
Radiation Detection and Measurement, JU, First Semester, 2010-2011
(Saed Dababneh).
8
Counting Statistics and Error Prediction
smaller <= Fluctuation => larger
Perfect
fit
15.891 (interpolation) or
http://www.stat.tamu.edu/~west/applets/chisqdemo.html
either gives = 0.6646
Conclusion:
no abnormal fluctuation.
Radiation Detection and Measurement, JU, First Semester, 2010-2011
(Saed Dababneh).
9
Counting Statistics and Error Prediction
Radiation Detection and Measurement, JU, First Semester, 2010-2011 (Saed
Dababneh).
10
Counting Statistics and Error Prediction
Single measurement
S 2 = 2
≈ x
x x x
x x
68% probability that this
interval includes the true
average value.
What if we want 99%..?
Fractional standard deviation
x
1
x
x
Need 1%?
Count 10000.
Radiation Detection and Measurement, JU, First Semester, 2010-2011
(Saed Dababneh).
11
Counting Statistics and Error Prediction
A series of
“single”
measurements.
Radiation Detection and Measurement, JU, First Semester, 2010-2011
(Saed Dababneh).
12
Counting Statistics and Error Prediction
Radiation Detection and Measurement, JU, First Semester, 2010-2011
(Saed Dababneh).
13
Counting Statistics and Error Prediction
• What about derived quantities? (Error propagation).
Net counts = Gross counts – Background
Derived
Measured
Gross counts = 1000
Background counts = 400
Net counts = 600 37
Compare to addition
instead of subtraction.
(Count, stop, count).
(not 600 24)
Count Rate = ? ?
Radiation Detection and Measurement, JU, First Semester, 2010-2011
(Saed Dababneh).
14
Counting Statistics and Error Prediction
Mean value of multiple independent counts.
• Assume we record N repeated counts from a single source for equal counting
times:
x1 x2 ... xN
2 x2 x2 ... x2
1
2
N
• For Poisson or Gaussian distributions:
X xi
i
So that
x1 x2 ... xN
2
Radiation Detection and Measurement, JU, First Semester, 2010-2011
(Saed Dababneh).
15
Counting Statistics and Error Prediction
Standard error of the mean
x
N
Nx
x
N
N
N
x
x
N
• To improve statistical precision of a given measurement by a factor of two
requires four times the initial counting time.
Radiation Detection and Measurement, JU, First Semester, 2010-2011
(Saed Dababneh).
16
Counting Statistics and Error Prediction
Optimizing counting time.
How to divide the limited available beam time?
S = (net) source count rate.
B = background count rate.
TS+B = time to count source + background.
TB = time to count background.
To minimize s :
TSB
S B
TB optimum
B
HW 30
Radiation Detection and Measurement, JU, First Semester, 2010-2011
(Saed Dababneh).
17
Counting Statistics and Error Prediction
• Background measurement?
• Without the “source”.
• Should include all sources
except the “source”.
• Accelerator applications:
background with beam.
• Minimum detectable amount.
• False positives and false negatives.
• Rest of Chapter 3.
Radiation Detection and Measurement, JU, First Semester, 2010-2011
(Saed Dababneh).
18