Transcript Slide 1

Ocean synthesis inter-comparison
using OceanDIVA
Alastair Gemmell
Keith Haines
Greg Smith
Jon Blower
Environmental Systems Science
Centre
University of Reading, UK
D
D
D
s
http://www.resc.rdg.ac.uk
Color-coded model-obs T misfits
Outline




Methods – OceanDIVA – a
Java web application to
visualize and compare
gridded model data, and insitu point observations
Geospatial representation
of the data.
Statistical representation
of the data
Conclusions
OceanDIVA – Ocean Data Inter-comparison and
Visualization Application
Input data
can be local
to the web
service or
read in
remotely via
OPeNDAP
protocol
For this study:
• Used EN3 (ENACT/ENSEMBLES)
observations dataset
• Compared a range of CLIVAR
GSOP ocean syntheses accessible
via OPeNDAP
• Analysed Sept ’04 (Sept ’01 for
syntheses finishing before ‘04)
Geospatial representation of data in
Google Earth
Probability Density Functions (PDFs)
Covering the north Pacific. Model is Reading ¼ degree
•
•
•
•
Binned data into bins of 10m by 0.2oC
Blues = bins with lower data density
Reds = bins with higher data density
Data density normalised to depth level
Minimum bin content = 3
1
2
Probability Density Functions (PDFs)
Covering the north Pacific. Model is Reading ¼ degree
Depth
Temperature Misfit
Salinity Misfit
Temperature
Observed Depth Depth Misfit
Salinity Misfit
Regional Variability
This example: Reading ¼ degree model showing S(T)
Atlantic
Pacific
Obs.
Obs.
Misfit
North
Trop.
South
Misfit
North Pacific z(T) across syntheses
Observations
ECCO-JPL
GFDL
ECMWF
World Ocean Atlas ‘05
CERFACS 2001
ECCO-SIO 2001
SODA
MERCATOR
INGV 2001
GECCO 2001
Reading 1o control
Reading 1o assim.
WOA ‘05
ECCO-GODAE
Reading 1/4o control
Reading 1/4o assim.
Bias v Standard Deviation
25
Misfit Std. Dev. (m)
65
North Pacific – z(T) – over T range 12-22 oC
0
CERFACS ‘01
ECCO-GODAE
ECCO-JPL
ECCO-SIO ‘01
ECMWF
Misfit Mean (m)
GECCO ‘01
GFDL
INGV ‘01
MERCATOR
Reading 1o control
50
Reading 1o assim.
Reading ¼o control
Reading ¼o assim.
SODA
WOA 2005
North Pacific S(T) across syntheses
Observations
ECCO-JPL
GFDL
ECMWF
ECCO-GODAE
CERFACS 2001
ECCO-SIO 2001
SODA
MERCATOR
INGV 2001
GECCO 2001
Reading 1o control
Reading 1o assim.
WOA ‘05
ECCO-GODAE
Reading 1/4o control
Reading 1/4o assim.
Bias v Standard Deviation
0.05
Misfit Std. Dev. (PSU)
0.13
North Pacific – S(T) – over T range 5-17 oC
0.0
CERFACS ‘01
ECCO-GODAE
ECCO-JPL
ECCO-SIO ‘01
ECMWF
Misfit Mean (PSU)
GECCO ‘01
GFDL
INGV ‘01
MERCATOR
Reading 1o control
0.14
Reading 1o assim.
Reading ¼o control
Reading ¼o assim.
SODA
WOA 2005
Bias v Standard Deviation
0.04
Misfit Std. Dev. (PSU)
0.11
North Pacific – S(T) – over T range 17-30 oC
0.0
CERFACS ‘01
ECCO-GODAE
ECCO-JPL
ECCO-SIO ‘01
ECMWF
Misfit Mean (PSU)
GECCO ‘01
GFDL
INGV ‘01
MERCATOR
Reading 1o control
0.08
Reading 1o assim.
Reading ¼o control
Reading ¼o assim.
SODA
WOA 2005
Conclusions

OceanDIVA is a useful tool for visualizing data, and comparing
model data with observations.

Useful for validation in fields of
• Ocean reanalyses
• Operational oceanography

Outputs shown which appear to reflect differences between
synthesis techniques – e.g. methods of data assimilation.
• E.g. mode waters, S(T) relationships

Interesting Future work planned including
• different and longer time periods
• using isopycnals
• more syntheses.

Provided correct metadata and standards are used, there is the
exciting prospect of increasing amounts of data available on
OPeNDAP servers etc, leading to more collaborative work and
comparisons being carried out.