Statistics for Analytical Chemistry
Download
Report
Transcript Statistics for Analytical Chemistry
Statistics for Analytical
Chemistry
Reading –lots to revise and learn
Chapter 3
Chapter 4
Chapter 5-1 and 5-2
Chapter 5-3 will be necessary background
for the AA lab
Chapter 5-4 we will use later
Data Analysis
Most data quantitative - derived from
measurements
Never really know error
With more measurements you get a
better idea what it might be
Don’t spend a lot of time on an answer
-where only 20% accuracy is required
-or where sampling error is big although you don’t want to make the
error worse
Significant Figure Convention
Final answer should only contain figures
that are certain, plus the first uncertain
number
eg 45.2%
error less than 1% or we would only write
45%
error larger than 0.05% or would write
45.23%
Remember
Leading zeros are not significant
Trailing zeros are significant
0.06037 - 4 significant figures
0.060370 - 5 significant figures
1200 ????
12 x 102 - 2 significant figures
Rounding Off
Round a 5 to nearest even number
4.55 to 4.6
Carry an extra figure all through calculations
BUT NOT 6 EXTRA
Just round off at the end
Adding
Absolute uncertainty of answer must not exceed
that of most uncertain number
Simple rule: Decimal places in answer = decimal
places in number with fewest places
12.2
00.365
01.04
13.605
goes to 13.6
When errors are known
Rr =(A a) + (B b) + (C c)
where r2 = a2 + b2 + c2
Example: Calculate the error in the MW
of FeS from the following atomic
weights:
Fe:55.847 0.004 S:32.064 0.003
r = (0.0042 + 0.0032)1/2
MW = 87.911 0.005
Multiplication and Division
Simplest rule: Sig figs in answer =
smallest number of sig figs in any value
used
This can lead to problems - particularly
if the first digit of the number is 9.
1.07400 x 0.993 = 1.07
1.07400 x 1.002 = 1.076
Error is ~ 1/1000 therefore 4 significant
figs in answer
Multiplication and Division
The relative uncertainty of the answer must
fall between 0.2 and 2.0 times the largest
relative uncertainty in the data used in the
calculation.
Unless otherwise specified, the absolute
uncertainty in an experimental measurement
is taken to be +/- the last digit
Multiplication and Division
With known errors - add squares of
relative uncertainties
r/R = [(a/A)2 + (b/B)2 +(c/C)2]1/2
Logs
Only figures in the mantissa (after the decimal
point) are significant figures
Use as many places in mantissa as there are
significant figures in the corresponding number
pH = 2.45
has 2 sig figs
Definitions
Arithmetic mean, (average)
Median -middle value
for N=even number, use average of central
pair
Accuracy
Deviation from true answer
Difficult to know
Best way is to use Reference standards
National Bureau of Standards
Traceable Standards
Precision
Describes reproducibility of results
What is used to calculate the confidence
limit
Can use deviation from mean
or relative deviation
0.1/5 x 1000 = 20ppt (parts per thousand)
0.1/5 x 100% = 2%
Precision of Analytical Methods
Absolute standard deviation s or sd
Relative standard deviation (RSD)
Standard deviation of the mean sm
Sm = s/N½
Coefficient of variation (CV) s/x x 100%
Variance
s2
Standard Curve
Readout
Not necessarily linear. Linear is
mathematically easier to deal with.
15
10
5
0
y = 1.9311x + 1.1127
2
R = 0.9888
0
1
2
3
4
5
[Ca] (mg/L)
6
7
Correlation coefficients
Show how good a fit you have.
R or R2
For perfect correlation, R = 1, R2 = 1
[( xi x)( yi y)]
R
2
2
( xi x) ( yi y)
2
2
LINEST
Calculates slope and intercept
Calculates the uncertainty in the slope and
the intercept
Calculates R2
Calculates s.d. of the population of y values
See page pp 68-72, Harris.
Use these values to determine the number of sig figs
for the slope and intercept
Dealing with Random Errors
Indeterminate Error
Repeating a coarse measurement gives the
same result
eg weighing 50 g object to nearest g - only
error would be determinate - such as there
being a fault in the balance
If same object was weighed to several
decimal places -get random errors
How many eggs in a dozen?
How wide is your desk?
Will everyone get the same answer?
What does this depend on?
With a few
measurements,
the mean won’t
reflect the true
mean as well as
if you take
a lot of
measurements
Random errors
With many measurements, more will be
close to the mean
Various little errors add in different ways
Some cancel - sometimes will all be one
way
A plot of frequency versus value gives a bell
curve or Gaussian curve or normal error
curve
Errors in a chemical analysis will fit this
curve
Equation for Gaussian Curve
e
y
2
( xi u ) 2
2 2
Let z
xi u
Then
y
e
z
2
2
2
If z is abscissa (x axis)
Same curve is always obtained
as
z expresses the deviation from the mean in
units of standard deviation
Statistics
Statistics apply to an infinite number of
results
Often we only do an analysis 2 or 3 times
and want to use the results to estimate the
mean and the precision
6868.3%: ±1 ,
95.4%: ±2 ,
99.7%: ±3
Standard deviation
68.3% of area is within ± 1 of mean
95.5% of area is within ± 2 of mean
99.7% of area is within ± 3 of mean
For any analysis, chances are 95.5 in
100 that error is ± 2
Can say answer is within ± 2 with
95.5% confidence
For a large data set
Get a good estimate of the mean,
i N
i 1
( xi u )
N
2
Know this formula -but use a calculator
2 = variance
Useful because additive
Small set of data
Average (x )
An extra uncertainty
The standard deviation calculated will differ
for each small set of data used
It will be smaller than the value calculated
over the larger set
Could call that a negative bias
s
i N
s
(x
i 1
i
x)
N 1
2
For use N in denominator
For s use N-1 in denominator (we have one
less degree of freedom - don’t know )
At end, round s to 2 sig figs or less if there
are not enough sig figs in data
Confidence Interval
We are doing an analysis to find the
true mean - it is unknown
What we measure is x but it may not
be the same as
Set a confidence limit eg 4.5 ± 0.3 g
The mean of the measurements was
4.5 g
The true mean is in the interval 4.2-4.8
with some specified degree of
confidence
Confidence limit
A measure of the reliability (Re)
The reliability of a mean (x ) increases as
more measurements are taken
Re = k(n)1/2
Reliability increases with square root of
number of measurements
Quickly reach a condition of limiting return
Reliability
Would you want a car that is 95% reliable?
How often would that break down?
Confidence Interval
For 100 % confidence - need a huge interval
Often use 95 %
The confidence level chosen can change
with the reason for the analysis
Confidence Interval when s ~
µ ± xi = 1.96 for 95 % confidence
z = (xi - µ)/ =1.96
Appropriate z values are given as a table
This applies to a single measurement
The confidence limit decreases as (N)1/2 as
more measurements are taken
Confidence Interval
In the lab this year I will make you go home
before you can get enough data for s to =
Therefore we will have to do a different kind
of calculation to estimate the precision.
Student’s t-test
The Student's t-Test was formulated by W.
Gossett in the early 1900's. His employer
(brewery) had regulations concerning trade
secrets that prevented him from publishing his
discovery, but in light of the importance of the t
distribution, Gossett was allowed to publish
under the pseudonym "Student".
The t-Test is typically used to compare the
means of two populations
t-test
( xi u )
t
s
t depends on desired confidence limit
degrees of freedom (N-1)
Degrees of Values of t for Various degrees of
Freedom
Probability
80%
90%
95%
99.9%
1
3.08
6.31
12.7
637
2
1.89
2.92
4.30
31.6
3
1.64
2.35
3.18
12.9
4
1.53
2.02
2.78
8.60
5
1.48
1.94
2.57
6.86
6
1.44
1.90
2.45
5.96
7
1.42
1.86
2.36
5.40
8
1.40
1.83
2.31
5.04
1.29
1.64
1.96
3.29
For practical purposes
Assume = s if you have made 20
measurements
Sometimes can be evaluated for a
particular technique rather than for each
sample
Usually too time consuming to do 20
replicate measurements on each sample
CONFIDENCE
ts
x
N
Example
Cal Culator obtained the following results for
replicate determinations of calcium in limestone
14.35%, 14.41%, 14.40%, 14.32%, 14.37%
each is xi
Calculate the confidence interval
Answer
Average = 14.37 %
S = 0.037%
Choose a 95 % confidence limit
Degrees of freedom = N-1 = 5-1 =4
From t-table, t = 2.78
14.37% ± ts/N½
14.37 % ± 2.78 x 0.037% / 5 ½
14.37 ± 0.05 %
Significant figures
I say: Use two or less significant figures in a
confidence limit. Then use the same number
of decimal places in both (guided by the CL)
When less than two sig figs in the CL?
When using two would require you to have
more decimal places than were in the actual
data.
The bunny gave up
Pooled standard deviation
s (n1 1) s (n2 1) ......
sp
N ns
2
1
2
2
ns no of groups of samples
i n1
sp
i n2
(x x ) (x x
i 1
2
i
1
i 1
n1 n2 2
i
2
)
2
Comparison of Means
We analyze several samples and want
to know if they are the same or different
For each sample we take several
measurements and obtain a mean
2
1
2
2
s
s
If x1 x 2 t
n1 n2
there is no significan t difference
Comparing two means
Compare x1 x2
to
ts1
ts2
n1
n2
If s is a pooled sd
x1 x 2
tcalc
s
n1n2
n1 n2
If tcalc ttable then the difference is
not significan t at the chosen CL
Comparing two means
s1 2
s2 2
x t. (
) (
)
n1
n2
If s is the pooled s
x1 x 2
t
s
n1n2
n1 n2
If tcalc ttable then the difference is
not significan t at the chosen CL
Example
Two barrels of wine were analyzed for their
alcohol content to determine whether or not
they were from different sources:
12.61% (6 analyses),
12.53% (4 analyses)
Pooled standard deviation = 0.07 %
12.61% 12.53% 6 * 4
t
1.77
0.07%
64
Degrees of freedom = 6+4-2=8
t at 95% CL for 8 deg of freedom =2.3
tcalc < ttable
therefore difference is not significant at
the 95% CL – the two samples are the
same at the 95% CL
Rejection of data- Q Test
Qexp= questionable value-nearest numerical value
range
Look up Table of Qcritical
If Qexp < Qcritical, keep the point
If more observations are taken it is easier to
determine if a point is an outlier
Calibration Sensitivity
The slope of the calibration curve at the
concentration of interest
Doesn’t take precision into account
Analytical Sensitivity
Slope/s.d. = m/s.d.
Where s = standard deviation of the signal
Analytical sensitivity is independent of gain,
but can vary with the concentration as s can
depend on concentration
Limit of detection
The minimum concentration detectable
at a known confidence level
Is the concentration corresponding to
the lowest usable reading (LUR)
LUR = average blank + k s.d.blank
k determines the confidence level
We use k = 3 for a 95% C.L.
Do not confuse LOD and LUR
Harris page 103
LUR corresponds to Signal detection limit
LOD corresponds to Concentration detection limit
When doing this in lab WE CHEAT
We should have 20 measurements of the blank
and we never do because of time constraints. To
publish a result or for a paying client, we would
need 20.
Readout
8
4
y = 1.9311x + 1.1127
2
R = 0.9888
0
0
1
2
3
4
Ideally, the average blank = b (the
intercept)
However, if b > average blank, then
recalculate LUR using LUR = b + k
s.d.blank
Usually say LUR = b + 3 sd
LOD = 5.2 mg/L (k = 3)
Note the 2 significant figures
Quality Assurance
Begins with sampling
Calibration Check
Run standards every few samples.
Reference standards are of known
concentration. Do you get the right answer?
Include in Table of Results.
SOP’s are very important
SOP (Standard operating
procedure)
Set of written instructions that document a
routine or repetitive activity which is followed
by employees in an organization.
The development and use of SOPs is an
integral part of a successful quality system.
Provides information to perform a job
properly and consistently in order to achieve
pre-determined specifications and quality.
http://people.stfx.ca/tsmithpa/Chem361/
Numerical Criteria for Selecting
Analytical Methods
Precision
Bias
Sensitivity
Detection Limit
Concentration Range
Selectivity
Other characteristics to be
considered
Speed
Ease and convenience
Skill required of operator
Cost and availibility of equipment
Per-sample-cost
Criterion
Figure of Merit
Precision
Absolute sd, relative sd, coefficient of
variation, variance
Bias
Absolute systematic error, relative systematic
error
Sensitivity
Calibration sensitivity, analytical sensitivity
Limit of
detection
Av.Blank + 3 sd blank
Concentratio
n range
LOQ to LOL (limit of linearity)
Selectivity
Coefficient of selectivity