Molecular shapes_1551_VB
Download
Report
Transcript Molecular shapes_1551_VB
Valence bond theory
Electrons are not simply dots
And bonds are not sticks
Learning objectives
Describe principles of valence bond theory
Predict hybridization of orbitals based on
Lewis dot structures and electronic
geometry
Describe difference between sigma and pi
bonding
Taking it to the next level:
acknowledging orbitals
VSEPR is quite successful in predicting
molecular shapes based on the simplistic
Lewis dot approach
But our understanding of the atom has the
electrons occupying atomic orbitals
How do we reconcile the observed shapes
of molecules with the atomic orbital picture
of atoms
Valence bond theory
Valence bond theory is the simplest
approach to an orbital picture of covalent
bonds
Each covalent bond is formed by an overlap
of atomic orbitals from each atom
The individual orbital identity is retained
The bond strength is proportional to the
amount of orbital overlap
Overlap of two 1s orbitals in H2
Overlap of two 2p orbitals directed along the bond
axis (sigma bond)
Overlap of p and s orbitals
Problems with tetrahedral bonds
In CH4 the bonds are all equivalent and at
angles of 109.5°
The 2p orbitals in C are at 90° - far from
optimum for overlap
The ground state configuration is 2s22p2
Reconcile these facts with the known
structure
Hybridization
The wave mechanics permits mixing of the
atomic orbital set to produce “hybrid” orbitals
Hybridization alters the shape and energy of
the original
In the case of C, the differences between
the 2s and 2p are smoothed out and a
homogeneous collection of four sp3 hybrid
orbitals is produced
sp3 hybridization
Formally, one of the 2s
electrons is promoted
to the empty 2p orbital
(an energy cost, which
is repaid on bond
formation)
The four basis orbitals
are then “hybridized” to
yield the set of four sp3
Tetrahedral directions and sp3
hybrids
Valence bond picture of CH4
Each C sp3 hybrid contains one electron
Each H 1s contains one electron
Lone pairs occupy sp3 hybrid orbitals
Valence bond picture of the tetrahedral electronic
geometry provides same results for the molecules
with lone pairs
Notes on hybridization
The total number of orbitals is unchanged
Four atomic orbitals (s + 3 x p) give four hybrid
orbitals (4 x sp3)
The electron capacity remains unchanged
There is one hybridization scheme for each
of the five electronic geometries
The same hybridization scheme is always
used for a given electronic geometry
sp hybridization for linear geometry
One s and one p orbital
sp2 hybridization for trigonal planar
One s and two p
orbitals
Sigma and pi bonding
The hybridized orbitals describe the
electronic geometry: bonds along the
internuclear axes (sigma bonds)
The “unused” p orbitals overlap in a parallel
arrangement above and below the
internuclear axis (pi bonds)
Comparison of pi and sigma bonding
Pi bonding accounts for bond
multiplicity
Two unused p orbitals in sp hybrid (linear
geometry)
Two pi bonds
N≡N triple bond (one sigma, two pi)
One unused p orbital in sp2 hybrid (trigonal
planar geometry
One pi bond
C=C double bond (one sigma, one pi)
Valence bond picture of ethylene
H2C=CH2
Sigma bonds between C and H (blue/red) and C
and C (blue)
Six electrons around C
Pi bond between C and C (green)
Two electrons around C
Valence bond picture of acetylene
HC≡CH
Sigma bonds between C and H (red and blue) and
C and C (blue)
4 electrons around C
Two pi bonds between C and C (green)
4 electrons around C
Beyond coordination number 4
Invoke empty d orbitals
(impossible for second row
elements)
One d orbital for trigonal
bipyramidal
Two d orbitals for octahedral
Number of orbitals in
hybrid always equals
number of charge clouds
Trigonal bipyramid – sp3d
Octahedral –sp3d2
Shortcomings of valence bond
The orbitals still maintain atomic identity
Bonds are limited to two atoms
Cannot accommodate the concept of
delocalized electrons – bonds covering
more than two atoms
Problems with magnetic and spectroscopic
properties