Transcript 9. Second WorkShop Integrated Case Study - Clim-Run

3rd governing board assembly
8-10 July 2013, ENEA, Roma
valentina giannini (cmcc)
ENEA(Italy) EEWRC(Cyprus) CNRM(France) ICTP(Italy) IC3(Spain) NOA(Greece)
CMCC(Italy) TEC(France) PlanBleu(France) PIK(Germany) UEA(UK)
GREVACHOT(Tunisia) JRC (Spain) DHMZ (Croatia) USMD(US) UC(Spain)
outline
• before the workshop
• workshop
• after the workshop
stakeholder involvement
• identification of stakeholders
• email and follow up calls
• definition of agenda with colleagues:
• CET: Alessio Bellucci and Erika Coppola
• RISK: Silvia Torresan and Valentina Gallina
• logistics: 28 May at ICTP in Trieste
stakeholder involvement
• invited: the “same” as first workshop  50
• participated:
Veneto
Regional Met office
Municipality of Venezia: urban sustainability
Municipality of Venezia: PAES and C40
Municipality of Venezia: energy agency
Friuli Venezia Giulia
Regional geologic service
Regional environmental agency
Regional environmental agency
Regional environmental agency
Regional Met office
Extension service Ledra Tagliamento
Marine Protected Area of Miramare
Adriano Barbi
Sandro Caparelli
Irene Gobbo
Simone Tola
Antonio Bratus
Giorgio Mattassi
Isabella Scroccaro
Dario Giaiotti
Andrea Cicogna
Damiano Furian
Carlo Franzosini
goals of workshop
• summary of activities organized for
stakeholders’ involvement
• presentation of CLIM-RUN products:
preliminary results
• discussion and validation
• next steps
time
10:30
start
10:30
Valentina Giannini
CMCC
11:00
all stakeholders
11:30
Alessio Bellucci
CMCC
Erika Coppola
ICTP
Erika Coppola and
Alessio Bellucci
12:00
12:30
13:00
lunch break
14:00
Silvia Torresan and
Valentina Gallina
CMCC
15:30
Valentina Giannini
CMCC
16:00
end

presentation of workshop for stakeholder involvement in the CLIM-RUN
project
 presentation of synthesis of stakeholders’ requests from first workshop
short introduction:
 how do I use climate services?
 what are my expectations from this workshop?
 what motivated me to be involved?
 sea level rise in the North Adriatic basin
 seasonal forecast of extreme events (precipitation and heat waves)
analysis of extreme indices derived from simulation of regional model
RegCM4, 50 km for Europe
discussion on presentations:
 is information provided understandable?
 will you be able to use it?
 if not: how can it be improved?
 is information presented relevant for your activities?
 what other information would you need?
climate impact and adaptation services in the North Adriatic coast
 sea level rise inundation risk maps
 pluvial flood inundation risk maps in urban areas
 water stress index and maps for agricultural typologies
next steps
CLIM-RUN presentations
• Valentina Giannini
 workshop presentation
 synthesis of process
feedback
stakeholders’ turn
• how do I use climate services?
• what are my expectations for this workshop?
• what motivated me to be involved?
feedback
highlights from stakeholders
NEEDS
• data with greater resolution then presented
• climate data
• data on impacts and risks
EXPECTATIONS
• understand climate change
• acquire information  disseminate to public
• information to improve management options
• knowledge for land-use planning, DRR and EWS
CLIM-RUN presentations
• Alessio Bellucci
 sea level rise in the north adriatic basin
 seasonal forecast of extreme events
(precipitation and heat waves)
• Erika Coppola
 analysis of extreme indices derived from
simulation of regional model RegCM4, 50 Km for
Europe
• Silvia Torresan e Valentina Gallina
 services for impacts and climate change
adaptation in coastal zones of north adriatic
discussion on
climate products
•
•
•
•
is information provided understandable?
will you be able to use it?
if not: how can it be improved?
is information presented relevant for your
activities?
• what other information would you need?
feedback
highlights from discussion
questions were asked to better understand what
was presented, suggested improvements:
• data to support different planning: longer time
series of observations, higher resolution
• regional agencies can do downscaling
• data on precipitation and winds
• in northern Italy a research project is trying to
create a repository of daily data since 1960
• precipitation patterns to improve irrigation
Climate impact and adaptation services
in the North Adriatic coast
Regional Risk Assessment (RRA)
was proposed to develop 3 products:
 sea level rise inundation risk maps
 pluvial flood inundation risk maps in
urban areas
 water stress index and maps for
agricultural typologies
A questionnaire was administered to
collect stakeholders’ feedbacks
about:
 testing areas for product’s
application
 input data
 output data
6 stakeholders out of 11
answered the questionnaire
Regional Risk Assessment: main phases, inputs and outputs
feedback
Product 1
Sea level rise inundation risk maps
 Stakeholders agreed with the proposed dataset suggesting more detailed
maps for vegetation and subsidence for Friuli Venezia Giulia Region
 Stakeholders were involved in the assignation of scores to the socioeconomic and environmental factors used in RRA
 Hazard inundation map: 5 stakeholders suggested the visualization in 3
classes, 1 stakeholder preferred 4 classes
 A threshold of 60 cm was selected by the majority of stakeholders (5/6) as
the maximum water level which generate the maximum inundation hazard.
feedback
Product 2
Pluvial flood inundation risk maps in urban areas

4 stakeholders considered the Veneto testing area as appropriate

1 stakeholder suggested to include urban and extra-urban areas of
Udine and Pordenone (Friuli Venezia Giulia provinces).

4 stakeholders considered the proposed receptors and vulnerability
factors as appropriate

1 stakeholder suggested a more detailed analysis of the slope influence on
inundated areas

The decade 2041-2050 was considered as appropriate time scale, 2
stakeholders suggested a more detailed analysis of the outputs (i.e.
monthly , annual or seasonal number of events).
feedback
Product 3
Water stress index and maps for agricultural
typologies
 The Po delta was considered not suitable for this product by 4 stakeholders.
They suggest to shift to the Upper and Lower Veneto and Friuli plane.
 4 stakeholders proposed to consider a more detailed analysis of the crop water
balance considering the available water capacity of the soil
 The following crop typologies were considered as relevant receptors: corn, cereals
and soybean in not irrigated land; rice fields; vineyards; olive groves
 4 stakeholders preferred to visualize the result in single crop maps, 1 stakeholder
prefers the visualization of a total crop map (i.e. all the crop typologies in the same
risk map).
 General interest in annual, monthly and seasonal time resolution for the 20412050 decade.
next phases
• communication of stakeholders feedback to
CET for product improvement (Del 8.2)
• identification of key messages:
 discussion during annual meeting in Rome
 inform CLIM-RUN protocol on climate services
• continue interaction with stakeholders: invite
to final meeting?
• evaluate the feasibility of applying and test
all the climate impact and adaptation
products in the North Adriatic region
grazie
[email protected]