Adaptation of Biodiversity to Climate Change in southern Africa
Download
Report
Transcript Adaptation of Biodiversity to Climate Change in southern Africa
Adaptation of Biodiversity to
Climate Change in southern
Africa
by: Jenny Cooper
CSIR, National Botanical Institute,
University of Pretoria & Kruger
National Park.
3 Case studies
2. North Eastern
Lowveld
1. Succulent Karoo
3. Cape Floral
Kingdom
Study area
Three case studies
– Cape: data rich, diverse, mountains, patchy
– Karoo: data poor, geology
– ‘Kruger’: large mammals and birds
Adaptation Options
Five options:
– No action
– Re-configure parks
– Consider alternatives to parks (migration
friendly land-uses)
– Facilitated migration and dispersal
– Ex-situ conservation (e.g. botanical gardens,
gene banks and/or zoos)
Key Analyses:
Step 1
Work with stakeholders
to identify project plan
Key Analyses:
Step 1
Work Step
with stakeholders
2
to identify
project plan
Determine:
Current knowledge (literature search)
Past/present biodiversity management
Species distributions
Key Analyses:
Step 1
Work Step
with stakeholders
2
to identify
project plan
Determine:
Curent knowledge (literature search)
Step 3 management
Past/present biodiversity
Introduce climate
change
and land cover scenarios
Species
distributions
Determine species environmental envelopes
Model species responses (dynamic models)
Key Analyses:
Step 1
Work Step
with stakeholders
2
to identify
project plan
Determine:
Curent knowledge (literature search)
Step 3 management
Past/present biodiversity
Introduce climate
change
and land cover scenarios
Species
distributions
Determine species environmental envelopes
Model species responses (dynamic models)
Step 4
Identify and analyse adaptation options to
achieve conservation objectives (economic tools)
Key Analyses:
Step 1
Work Step
with stakeholders
2
to identify
project plan
Determine:
Curent knowledge (literature search)
Step 3 management
Past/present biodiversity
Introduce climate
change
and land cover scenarios
Species
distributions
Determine species environmental envelopes
Model species responses
models)
Step (dynamic
4
Identify and analyse adaptation options (economic tools)
Step 5
Synthesis, recommendations and training
Research questions to be
investigated
What are the economic, social and
environmental costs and benefits
associated with a range of adaptation
options? (MCA)
What are the cost implications if species
richness increases/decreases)?
What are the benefits (potential
economic returns) of eco-tourism
activities? (NE Lowveld)
Research questions to be
investigated (cont)
What is the most desirable adaptation
option/s in each of the study areas?
(Investigate the cost-effectiveness of
each option)
What is the sensitivity of costs &
benefits to changes in species richness?
Approach adopted:
Primary objective is to examine ways of
reducing vulnerability of biodiversity to CC
in the most cost-effective and sustainable
means.
From previous phases will have identified
vulnerability that is likely and adaptation
options which can reduce this vulnerability.
Thus will have a short list of ‘viable’
alternatives, which will then be assessed
using MCA to identify most preferable
option.
Approach adopted (cont):
Derivation of marginal cost curves for each
adaptation option in the study areas
(includes examination of land use efficiency,
species representation and irreversibility of
species loss).
Collection of eco-tourism stats for the
Lowveld area (e.g. tourist numbers visiting
the KNP, average tourist expenditure, etc).
Approach adopted (cont):
Derivation of marginal benefit curves for ecotourism in the NE Lowveld area only.
Test the sensitivity of costs and benefits to
different levels of species richness (ie:
determine the elasticity's associated with
different costs and benefits).
Select and justify adaptation options in each of
the 3 areas in a manner which is
understandable to all stakeholder groups.
(No results as yet)
Anticipated Problems:
Data availability
Determination of TEV (use and non-use
values)
Methodological problems (e.g. defining
appropriate discount rate)
Lack of existing economic models
unique to each area.
Solutions to overcome
problems:
Where no data on the extent of land required
to achieve the required level of biodiversity
conservation is available than the IUCN figure
of 10% of total land area will be used.
Use best available data to determine
appropriate discount rate.
Undertake sensitivity analysis to establish the
impacts of data assumptions.
Generic economic model will be developed
and applied to each area.
Questions and
comments?