ENSO changes due to heat flux adjustment in current and future

Download Report

Transcript ENSO changes due to heat flux adjustment in current and future

The effect of doubled CO2 and model
basic state biases on the monsoonENSO system: the mean response
and interannual variability
Andrew Turner,
Pete Inness, Julia Slingo
NCAS-Climate, University of Reading, UK
Motivation #1
• How will the Asian summer monsoon
(which affects more than 2 billion people)
change with increased greenhouse gas
forcing?
The model & datasets
• HadCM3 -atmosphere 3.75°lon x 2.5°lat
-ocean 1.25° x 1.25°
• L30 used rather than L19 - more realistic
intraseasonal tropical convection (Inness et al.
2001) and better convective response to high
SSTs (Spencer & Slingo 2003).
• 100 year integrations at pre-industrial CO2
(control) and 2xCO2.
• ERA-40 Reanalysis (1958-1997).
• All –India Rainfall (AIR) gauge dataset;
Parthasarathy et al. (1994).
The effect of climate change
summer (JJAS) surface temperature differences: 2xCO2-1xCO2
HadCM3
The effect of climate change
summer (JJAS) 850hPa wind differences: 2xCO2-1xCO2
HadCM3
The effect of climate change
summer (JJAS) precipitation differences: 2xCO2-1xCO2
HadCM3
Motivation #2
• Correct simulation of the basic state in the tropics
essential for accurate seasonal prediction of
precipitation variability (Sperber & Palmer 1996).
• Systematic biases could have an enormous
influence on predictions of the future climate
(Federov & Philander 2000).
• Test the effect of systematic biases at 2xCO2
using limited area heat-flux adjustments.
Heat flux adjustments
• Traditionally used in older models (e.g. HadCM2)
to prevent climate drift; HadCM3 does not have this
problem.
• Used here to counteract biases in the mean state.
• Devised by Inness et al. (2003) to investigate the
role of systematic low-level zonal wind and SST
errors on the MJO.
• Coupled model run for 20 years, Indian and Pacific
SSTs within 10S-10N relaxed back to climatology.
• Anomalous heat fluxes generate a mean annual
cycle which is applied to a new 100 year integration
(HadCM3FA).
Heat flux adjustments
Annual Mean
• Large fluxes (up to
186Wm-2 at 120W)
into the cold tongue.
• Much smaller
(~30W.m-2) over
Maritime Continent
and Indian Ocean.
Amplitude of annual cycle
• Small annual cycle
apart from upwelling
region off African coast.
Improvements to the mean state
HadCM3FA mean summer (JJAS) surface temperature
differences with HadCM3
HadCM3 differences with ERA-40
Heat flux adjustments
• Same heat flux adjustments used as in
1xCO2 experiment (Turner et al. 2005).
• Assume that systematic model biases will
remain consistent (there is no dataset for
comparison).
• 100 year integrations of HadCM3FA
compared at 1xCO2, 2xCO2.
The effect of climate change
summer (JJAS) surface temperature differences: 2xCO2-1xCO2
HadCM3
HadCM3FA
The effect of climate change
summer (JJAS) 850hPa wind differences: 2xCO2-1xCO2
HadCM3
HadCM3FA
The effect of climate change
summer (JJAS) precipitation differences: 2xCO2-1xCO2
HadCM3
HadCM3FA
Monsoon & ENSOHadCM3
variability
1.221.51
HadCM3FA
2.052.17
HadCM3
0.941.05
HadCM3FA
1.211.32
The teleconnection
Lag-correlation of summer (JJAS) Indian rainfall with Nino-3 SSTs
Instantaneous correlation of summer (JJAS) Indian rainfall with Nino-3 SST
(in 21-year moving window )
Consistent with the findings of Annamalai et al. 2006
Summary
Future monsoon simulation:
• Tendency to stronger monsoons in future
climate scenario, irrespective of flux
correction.
• Increased interannual variability using both
dynamic and rainfall indices.
• Increased climate change signal when
biases are removed.
Summary
Future monsoon-ENSO relationship:
• Monsoon-ENSO teleconnection more
susceptible to bias removal than
greenhouse warming.
• Stronger biennial character to fluxadjusted future ENSO.
• Large amplitude variations across decadal
timescales under fixed CO2 forcing
suggest recent changes in the observed
record may not be due to climate change.