Transcript CARE Peru impact group - P

Reflections on Priority Impact group
CARE Peru
June 2009
Defining Characeristics of a CARE program….
1. A clearly defined goal for impact on the lives of a
specific group, realized at broad scale
• The program must define what “broad scale” means, but, in
general, we mean at least at national scale or for a whole
marginalized population group.
• Impact should occur across three areas of unifying framework
(human conditions, social position, enabling environment).
• Impact should be seen and evaluated over an extended
period of time.
Poverty in Peru is concentrated in Rural Highlands (Sierra
Rural), and the Amazonian Indigenous population (“Nativo”)
In seeking to contribute to generate significant changes and impacts at broad scale, we particularly want to
see such impacts achieved for women, men, boys and girls and adolescents from the Rural Highlands
and Amazonian Indigenous Communities, within the framework of priority national and international
goals in Peru.
CARE Peru considers poverty a multidimensional concept, within a human rights framework, and not just
as economic poverty, and so we take a broad range of international and national commitments as a basis
for setting the goals and targets to whose fulfillment our programs seek to contribute.
These goals include:
•The Millennium Development Goals
•The Fourth World Conference on Women (Beijing)
•The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
•The Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015
•The National Agreement (“Acuerdo Nacional”)
•The Multianual Macroeconomic Framework (MMM)
•The Multianual Social Framework (MSM)
•The National Plan for Equality of Opportunities between Men and Women
•The Multisectoral Strategic Plan in response to Tuberculosis, and the Multisectoral Strategic Plan 20072011 for the Prevention and Control of Sexually Transmitted Diseases and HIV/AIDS
•The National Plan for Disaster Prevention and Response
•The UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples
•Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness
Criteria for defining priority impact group, within framework of
anti discrimination, rights and equity...which sector of the
population is furthest from seeing its rights fulfilled in the impact
area relevant for each program?
•
•
•
•
•
•
Population group (rural, urban, indigenous)
Geographical location (coast, Highlands, department/region)
Sex (men, women)
Economic groups (extreme poor, poor, non poor)
Age (children, women of reproductive age)
Most vulnerable groups (MSM, SW, Trans, prison population)
Proposed Priority Impact Group for CARE Peru Programs:
Families living below or near the poverty and extreme poverty lines
In the Andean Highlands and in Amazonian Indigenous Communities
Women
(including youth)
Men
(including youth)
Girls and female
adolescents
Boys and male
adolescents
Sustainable
Sustainable
Economic Development Economic Development
Nutrition
Nutrition
Nutrition
Education
Education
Education
Gender
Gender
Health
Health
Health
HIV & TB
HIV & TB
HIV & TB
HIV & TB
Climate Change
Climate Change
Climate Change
Climate Change
Integrated Water
Integrated Water
Integrated Water
Integrated Water
Resource Management Resource Management Resource Management
Resource Management
Governance &
Governance &
Governance & Extractive Governance & Extractive
Extractive Industries
Extractive Industries
Industries
Industries
Emergencies &
Emergencies &
Emergencies & Disaster Emergencies & Disaster
Disaster Risk Reduction Disaster Risk Reduction
Risk Reduction
Risk Reduction
CARE PERU PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS
Program Impact Goals
The international and national goals and targets to which the
program contributes, in the framework of the MDGs, international
Conventions, and national strategies or frameworks (such as the
Multianual Macroeconomic Framework or the Multianual Social
Framework)
Priority Impact Group
The population group in whose lives CARE Peru's programs seek to
generate significant and sustainable impacts, in terms of poverty
and social injustice, at broad scale
Direct Impact Subgroup
The subset of the priority impact group with
whom we work directly in our projects
Secondary Objective Group
The group with whom we work as a means to
generate the impact in the priority impact group.
Although we may generate positive impacts in
the lives of this group, this is a means rather than
an end in itself
Population with whom a project will
work directly to generate positive
impacts – including the direct impact
subgroup and members of the
secondary target group
Stakeholder Group
National Poverty Line
National Extreme Poverty Line
Key actors who facilitate our interventions and
advocacy , and who can affect (positively or
negatively) or be affected by the program, but are
not our impact group
SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS
Program Impact Goals
MDG1: 50% reduction in poverty and extreme poverty, reduction in
poverty gap, and increase in share of national income of poorest
20%. MMM: poverty from 48.7% to 30%, and rural poverty from
70.9% to 45% (2006-2011). MSM: Improve income distribution to
halve the gap between the richest 20% and the poorest 50%.
Priority Impact Group
Women and men below or near the poverty and extreme poverty
lines, in the Andean Highlands and Amazonian Indigenous
Communities
Direct Impact Subgroup
Poor women and men with whom we work directly in our
projects, in Ancash, Ayacucho, Cajamarca, Huancavelica
& Puno
Secondary Objective Group
Non-poor entrepreneurial small farmers in the
communities where we work, for whom our
projects generate positive impacts as a means
(force of example, leaders of change, etc.) to
generate impacts for the priority impact groups
Population with whom a specific
project works directly: for example, Alli
Allpa in Ancash – includes those below
the poverty line (88%) as well as non- National Poverty Line
poor (12%)
Stakeholder Group
National Extreme Poverty Line
Key actors that facilitate our interventions and
advocacy work: Local government, Ministry of
Agriculture, research bodies, private sector,
technical assistance providers, NGOs, etc.
Program
Priority Impact
Group
Direct Impact
Subgroup
Secondary Objective
Group
Stakeholder
Group
Sustainable
Economic
Development
Women and men below or
near the poverty and extreme
poverty lines, in the Andean
Highlands and Amazonian
Indigenous Communities
Poor women and men
with whom we work
directly in our projects
Entrepreneurial non--poor
Institutions, private sector,
etc.
Nutrition
Poor women, girls and boys in
Highlands and Amazonian
indigenous communities
Poor women, girls and
boys in communities
where we work…
Community authorities, men,
health volunteers, health staff,
local governments, etc.
Ministries, Mayors, national
government, JUNTOS, etc.
Education
Indigenous boys and girls, and
women, from rural highlands
and jungle
Boys and girls in
schools/women in
communities where…
Teachers, parents, community
leaders, local education
specialists, etc.
Ministry of Education,
Ministry of Economics &
Finance, local government
Gender
Women and girls from rural
highlands and jungle
Women and girls in
communities where…
Men and boys from
communities where we work,
community leaders, etc.
National government, local
government, women´s
movement, etc.
Health
Reproductive age women and
newborns in rural highlands
and jungle
Direct participants in our
projects
Health staff, community
authorities, health volunteers,
men & mothers in law in project
communities, etc.
National and local
government, women´s
movement, Finance
ministry, etc.
HIV & TB
MSM, SW, Trans, prison
population, reproductive age
women and their newborn
children, adolescents, rural
poor
Vulnerable groups with
which projects work
directly
Health staff, school children,
networks of PLWHA
National and local
government, NGOs, etc.
IWRM
Families in or near poverty
lines in rural highlands/ jungle
Families in communities
where we work directly
Local government staff, health
promoters, community leaders…
National and local
government, etc.
Others
To be completed…
Next steps
• Ensure standardized definitions of categories
(rural, urban, etc.),
• Map recent past, current and future desired
areas for direct intervention, against district
poverty lines
• Continue defining/refining program strategies