Transcript Document

Potentials and challenges of using
M&E for institutionalizing impact
evaluation and adaptive learning within
organizations and programs involved
in climate change adaptation
International impact evaluation conference,
Cairo, April 2nd 2009
Contact:
 Nathalie Beaulieu [email protected]
2
www.crdi.ca/acca
A few notes on the CCAA program
 Joint initiative between DFID and IDRC
 Initiated in March 2006, team in place in
September
 Presently funds 25 projects across Africa,
most of which use participatory action
research and link with at-risk groups and
policy-makers
 Some of these research projects are on
cross-cutting themes (eg: PAR, Knowledge
sharing)
3
www.crdi.ca/acca
Goal of the CCAA program
 To significantly improve the capacity of African
populations and organizations to adapt to climate change
in ways that benefit the most poorest and most vulnerable
individuals
4
www.crdi.ca/acca
A basic assumption
 people and organizations adapt better to changing
conditions if they
 are able to anticipate future changes,
 keep an eye on current changes
 observe and assess the impacts of efforts to improve their
situation.
 In other words, they can adapt better if they monitor and
evaluate their own adaptation, either formally or
informally.
5
www.crdi.ca/acca
Therefore…
 In order to improve the capacity of African
people and organizations to adapt to
climate change we should encourage a
wider and better use of the practice of
M&E with a learning focus.
 Impact evaluation can be made part of
the M&E process
6
www.crdi.ca/acca
A generic schematization of adaptation
System
stakeholders
Development
facilitators
Different actors
engage with
each other
System
stakeholders
anticipate
future climate
hazards and
search for
options to
increase their
coping
capacity
System
stakeholders
choose and
implement
adaptation
options
Stakeholders
Increase system’s
coping capacity to
climate variability
(=reduced
vulnerability)
Researchers
System
stakeholders are
able to express
their needs
Policy-makers
external to
system or of
higher levels
7
External policy
makers are informed
about climate related
risks and options
available
External policy
makers
choose and
implement
assistance
options
www.crdi.ca/acca
External policy
makers provide
assistance to help
the system cope
For a given
future
climate
variability
X, reduced
risk of
undesired
outcome Y
CCAA’s contribution to date
 M&E is included in the Participatory action research
approaches used by our projects
 We have arranged for our projects to receive M&E support
 We’re testing it on ourselves
 We are attempting to make methodological contributions
and to share them with others
8
www.crdi.ca/acca
But that is not enough…
 We need to learn from organisations who
have succeeded in setting up operational
M&E systems related to climate change
adaptation
 We need to team up with organisations
who could disseminate and institutionalise
learning-focused approaches to M&E
9
www.crdi.ca/acca
Why regional and sub-regional organisations ?
 Work in many countries
 Often already do M&E or are wanting to strengthen their
use of it
 Have partnerships with national organisations who
themselves partner with local organisations
 Need multi-level interactions to be able to evaluate the
impact of their actions and policies on the ground
 Often have technical capacities, means and a certain
authority
10
www.crdi.ca/acca
Some challenges
 Evaluating adaptive capacity
 Developing a learning focused evaluation
 Connecting evaluation with planning and
decision-making
 Obtaining optimal benefits while limiting
workload
11
www.crdi.ca/acca