New Entrant TB Screening
Download
Report
Transcript New Entrant TB Screening
New Entrant TB Screening
Dr. John P. Watson
Consultant Respiratory Physician
New Entrant TB Screening -
Why?
Tuberculosis case reports & rates by place of birth, UK, 2004-2013
98
93
100
91
86
86
84
6,000
84
82
90
81
Number of cases
70
5,000
80
70
60
4,000
50
3,000
40
30
2,000
20
1,000
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
0
0
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Year
UK born
Non-UK born
Rate UK born
Rate Non-UK born
Source: Enhance Tuberculosis Surveillance (ETS), Enhanced Surveillance of Mycobacterial Infections (ESMI), Labour Force Survey (LFS)
Data as at: May 2014. Prepared by: TB Section, Centre for Infectious Disease Surveillance and Control, Public Health England
3
10
Tuberculosis in the UK: 2014 report
Rate (per 100,000)
7,000
Tuberculosis case reports & rates by age group & place of birth,
UK, 2013
1,200
100
1,100
90
1,000
80
70
800
700
60
600
50
500
40
400
30
300
20
200
10
100
0
0
Age group (years)
UK Born
Non-UK Born
Rate in UK Born
Rate in Non-UK Born
Source: Enhance Tuberculosis Surveillance (ETS), Enhanced Surveillance of Mycobacterial Infections (ESMI),Labour Force Survey (LFS)
Data as at: May 2014. Prepared by: TB Section, Centre for Infectious Disease Surveillance and Control, Public Health England
4
Tuberculosis in the UK: 2014 report
Rate (per 100,000)
Number of cases
900
New Entrant TB Screening –
How?
Pre-entry CXR
Figure 1.8: Non UK-born tuberculosis case reports by
time since entry to the UK to tuberculosis diagnosis,
UK, 2012
600
Number of cases
500
400
300
200
100
0
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Years since entry to diagnosis
Source: Enhanced Tuberculosis Surveillance (ETS), Enhanced Surveillance of Mycobacterial Infections (ESMI)
Data as at July 2013
Prepared by: TB Section, Centre for Infectious Disease Surveillance and Control, Public Health England
7
Tuberculosis in the UK: 2013 report
40
45
50+
Proportion of TB case reports by site of disease, UK, 2004-2013
100
Proportion of cases (%)
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Year
Pulmonary*
2010
2011
Extra-pulmonary only
* With or without extra-pulmonary disease
Source: Enhance Tuberculosis Surveillance (ETS), Enhanced Surveillance of Mycobacterial Infections (ESMI)
Data as at: May 2014. Prepared by: TB Section, Centre for Infectious Disease Surveillance and Control, Public Health England
8
Tuberculosis in the UK: 2014 report
2012
2013
Limitations
500 diagnosed within 1 year of arrival
52% pulmonary = 260 cases detectable by CXR
– assuming that CXR abnormal up to 12 months
before presentation with symptoms.
UK total 7892 cases in 2013
At best, reduce incidence by 3.3%
Yield of pre-entry screening
70-80 cases of TB detected per year
2013 increased to 130
Rate 188/100,000 (0.19%)
Public Health England: Tuberculosis in the UK: 2014 report
Time between entry to the UK & TB diagnosis for
non-UK born TB cases by year, UK, 2013
Source: Enhance Tuberculosis Surveillance (ETS), Enhanced Surveillance of Mycobacterial Infections (ESMI), Office for National Statistics (ONS)
Data as at: May 2014. Prepared by: TB Section, Centre for Infectious Disease Surveillance and Control, Public Health England
11
Tuberculosis in the UK: 2014 report
TUBERCULOSIS
CXR on arrival?
Meta-anylsis
TB diagnosis yield by CXR screening
Total TB 0.35%
Continent of origin
Europe 0.24%
Africa 0.65%
Asia 1.12%
Arshad et al. Eur Respir J 2010; 35:1336-1345
LTBI in new entrants
Most TB in overseas born
Most have been here > 1 year – opportunity to
identify LTBI before develop active disease
Most in age group eligible for chemoprophylaxis
Screening for LTBI - how
TST
IGRA
2 step test:
TST, followed by IGRA if positive to improve specificity
Which test for LTBI in new
entrants?
Norway 2005-6
912 asylum seekers, 72% BCG
29% Quantiferon Pos
TST ≥ 6mm :
460(50%)
Detect 88% of Pos IGRA
TST ≥ 15mm:
141 (15%)
Detect 39% of pos IGRA
Winje BA et al. BMC Infect Dis. 2008; 8: 65.
New Entrant TB Screening -
Who?
New Entrants:
Who to screen for LTBI?
NICE 2006
Children
Pregnant women
Sub-Saharan Africa
East Timor
NICE 2006: CG33
Problems with NICE 2006:
Who to screen?
LTBI testing limited to Africa (+East Timor)
TB incidence Gambia: 173/105
TB incidence Philippines: 292/105
Largest number of TB cases in UK in overseas
born from Asia.
42% Pakistan, India & Bangladesh
<50% from Africa
Most frequent countries of birth for non-UK born TB cases, UK, 2013
Country of birth
India
Pakistan
Somalia
Bangladesh
Nepal
Nigeria
Philippines
Zimbabwe
Sri Lanka
Kenya
Romania
Afghanistan
Poland
Eritrea
China
Others (each
<1%)
Total*
Number of cases
Percentage
of cases*
Median time since
entry to UK (IQR)**
1,615
1,103
292
248
170
164
136
105
95
84
70
67
66
62
56
29.8
20.4
5.4
4.6
3.1
3.0
2.5
1.9
1.8
1.6
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.0
5 (2 -13)
7 (2 -22)
9 (4 -13)
7 (3 -18)
3 (2 -6)
7 (3 -11)
8 (5 -12)
11 (7 -12)
7 (3 -13)
22 (8 -37)
2 (0 -4)
6 (2 -11)
5 (2 -7.5)
4 (2 -7)
7 (4 -11)
1,082
20.0
5 (1 -13)
5,415
100
7 (3 -14)
* Where country of birth was known; **Years
Source: Enhance Tuberculosis Surveillance (ETS), Enhanced Surveillance of Mycobacterial Infections (ESMI)
Data as at: May 2014. Prepared by: TB Section, Centre for Infectious Disease Surveillance and Control, Public Health England
22
Tuberculosis in the UK: 2014 report
New Entrants:
Who to screen for LTBI?
NICE 2011
“High incidence countries”
Defined in NICE as >40/100,000
NICE 2011: CG117
Problems with NICE 2011:
Who to screen?
Logic of 40/100,000 threshold
People moving from Libya (TB incidence 40/105) to
London (TB incidence 44.4/105) should be screened
Should we screen all “immigrants” to Yorkshire or
Manchester from London?
Yield low – is it cost effective?
The problem in Leeds - 2006
Rising incidence of TB, predominantly among
arrivals to UK in previous 2-3 years
NICE guidance for new entrant Xrays
Massive resource implication
Lack of logic in who to screen for LTBI
GP registrations: 6-8x more new entrants than
previously identified by Port Health.
No increase in resources
Rising Immigration
New Immigrants Registering with GP in Leeds 2000 - 2007
16000
Number of Registrations
14000
All Countries
12000
10000
Countries w ith TB Incidence >40 per
100,000
8000
Countries w ith TB Incidence >160 per
100,000
6000
4000
2000
0
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Year
2005
2006
2007
TB
SCREENING
2007 Leeds Pilot
Limit to countries with TB incidence >200
No TST except children
Nurse led community based clinic
Simple symptom questions + QFT for all
>16yrs
QFT neg – informed by letter, no further action
QFT pos - invited for CXR and medical review
If no active TB, <35 – Rx for LTBI
Leeds immigrant screening results
2007
Number screened
LTBI diagnosed
active TB
Total cost
Cost per LTBI diagnosed
Leeds
280
105
0
£9 781
£93.18
NICE 2006
275
83*
0
£13 346
£160.81*
*Assuming no false negative TST
Hardy et al, Thorax 2010;65:178-80
Leeds 2008 - 2012
Based on 2007 pilot
New Entrants identified by GP registration data
Funding improved to move threshold down to
160/100,000 to include India and Pakistan
Screened 2884
684 (23.7%) IGRA positive
Chemoprophylaxis completion rate 89%
Audit of 184 patients in 2009
Problem – high rate of non attendance for
screening
Yield of IGRA for new entrant
screening
Multicentre study
“Real life” screening situation 2009
Leeds, Westminster, Blackburn
New entrants, screened with IGRA
QuantiFERON TB Gold In Tube
Pareek M, et al. Lancet Infect Dis 2011;11:435-44.
Results
Total screened:
Age
<16 36
16-25 589
26-35 604
1229
( 3%)
(48%)
(49%)
Female:
Previous BCG:
Indian subcontinent:
Sub-Saharan Africa:
51%
83%
60%
20%
Results (continued)
IGRA Results
Positive
Negative
Indeterminate
245
982
2
Positive result associated with:
Increasing TB incidence in country of origin
(p<0.01)
TB incidence <150/105 : 13%
TB incidence >150/ 105: 21.5%
(20%)
(80%)
(0.2%)
Increasing age (p<0.0001)
Active TB: 5 cases.
Cost effectiveness
Couuntries with TB incidence> 150/105
ICER £20,819 per case prevented
More effective and less cost than NICE 2006
150/105 prevents more disease than higher
threshold.
Detect 92% positive IGRA
NICE 2006 protocol would miss 71% of LTBI
Assumptions for cost calculations
Pos Quantiferon – untreated has 5% risk of TB
within 20 years
Chemoprophylaxis reduces risk by 60%
BUT
The Big But
Blackburn 1989-2001 New entrants 16-34 yr
with pos TST: 16% active TB after 15 years
Norway asylum seekers:
Pos QFT: Active TB 3.3% in 23-32 months
Choudhury et al, Public Health 2014;36:390-5
Winje BA et al. BMC Infect Dis. 2008; 8: 65.
ERS 2014 new data
If 15% Active TB after 20 years
cost to prevent 1 case of TB: not £20,819,
but……
£3,040
LTBI
New Entrant TB Screening -
When?
New Entrants:
When to screen?
As soon as possible!
Before leaving home country?
Problem of adequate resources for testing and
treatment
Verification of test results / treatment
Distorts priority in high burden countries from case
finding and holding of active TB
Risk of reinfection prior to travel to UK
Not practical for asylum seekers / war zones
New Entrants:
When to screen?
At airport
Experience of port of entry CXR not promising
Follow up of results?
Asylum seekers: reception centre
On arrival in destination place of residence
GP registration
Social Housing / school entry/ work permit /
university registration
New Entrant TB Screening:
Conclusions
Why: Top reduce the incidence of TB in UK
Who: New entrants from countries with TB
incidence > 150/105
How: Single step IGRA
When: As soon as possible after arrival in UK
But can it make a difference?