Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) and Magnetic
Download
Report
Transcript Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) and Magnetic
Computed Tomography
Angiography (CTA)
and
Magnetic Resonance
Angiography (MRA)
What Are They?
Computed Tomography Angiography
(CTA)
Imaging of the vasculature using CT techniques
Can be 3-D
Requires contrast
Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA)
Imaging of the vasculature system using MRI
techniques
Can be 3-D
No contrast required
How Does
CTA Work?
Uses X-rays
Tube rotates around patient at high speed
Detector picks up attenuated beam
Computer generates the image
Collects image in axial plane but can be
converted into sagittal, or coronal views
Computer can generate 3-d images
How Does MRA work?
Uses a large magnet align hydrogen atom in the
body
Pulsed radio-waves cause hydrogen atoms to
flip out of alignment
When the radio-waves are turned off the
hydrogen atom flip back and give off their own
signal
Signal is detected by the computer and used to
generate an image
Different body tissues
have different amounts
of Hydrogen
What is CTA used for?
Imaging of calcified atherosclerotic plaque
Areas
that are scan for plaque include:
Carotid Bulb
Iliac arteries
Coronary arteries
Used to detect legs clots before they break
and cause pulmonary emboli
Calcified plaque seen on CTA
Angiogram of the same vessel
What is MRA used for?
MRA is used to image many peripheral vessels
Areas that are imaged include:
Circle of Willis
Cerebral Arteries
Renal Arteries
If there is a contrast allergy then MRA is used
Benefits of CTA
Detecting narrowing vessels in time for
intervention
Better anatomical detail than with MRA or
ultrasound
Can be used for screening for arterial disease
Less costly and safer than
conventional angiography
Contrast reactions are
less severe
Risks of CTA
Allergic reactions to contrast media
Avoided in patients with kidney disease
due to contrast
Ionizing radiation is used
Pregnant women should not have a CT
due to radiation
Benefits of MRA
Detailed images without damaging the
artery with a catheter
Shorter procedure and recovery times
than with conventional angiography
Less costly than catheter angiography
No exposure to ionizing radiation
Use of contrast is
not necessary to
obtain good images
Risks of MRA
Metal implants may be affected by the
magnetic field
Claustrophobic patients may need ot be
sedated
It is unknown how the magnetic field
affects the fetus so first trimester patients
should not have an MRI
Limitations of CTA
Fuzzy images if there is patient movement
Heart beat can blur images
Blocked vessels are harder to interpret
Not reliable for imaging small twisted
vessels in rapidly moving organs
Faster
gantry times will solve this problem
Limitations of MRA
Any metal object in the patient is
contraindicative
Image clarity is not as good as
conventional angiography
Cannot image calcified plaque
Hard to image very small vessels
Accuracy of CTA
16-slice multidetector machine
Sensitive
and specific for 2mm diameter or
greater 92-93%
Ultra fast 16-slice multidetector machine
Sensitive
and specific for 2mm diameter or
greater 95-98%
64-slice multidetector machine
Sensitive
and specific for 2mm diameter or
greater 92-93%
Accuracy of MRA
Detecting Cerebral aneurysms with an average
accuracy of about 70% without contrast
False positives averaged approx. 27
With contrast 100% sensitive for aneurysmal
and stenotic lesions
Specificity of completely occluded lesions also
100%
Drops to 83.3% when only partially occluded
What’s to come?
Improved spatial resolution
Resolutions
due to software advancements are
improving
Decreasing costs
Screening
CTA screening
Joint Modalities
Combining
for CAD
of the two for better images
Better accuracy
New
contrast medias for MR and faster CT machines
Bibliography
Dargan, R., Volkin, L., New Application Enhances Capabilities of
Angiographic CT, retrieved February 5, from:
www.asrt.org/content/News/IndustryNews
Briefs/CT/NewApplica050318.aspx
Sheth, T. et. al., (2005), Coronary Computed Tomography
Angiography: Emerging Technique for Coronary Artery Imaging,
JACR 2005:56(1):15-24
Tripathi, RP, et. al., (2002), Three-Dimensional Contrast-Enhanced
Magnetic Resonance Angiography- Our Preliminary Experience, Ind.
J. Raiol. Imag. 2002, 12:2:179-188
www.cir.uc.edu/ research.html
www.medscape.com/viewarticle/521872?rss
www.radiologyinfo.org/content/ct-angiography.htm
www.radiologyinfo.org/content/mr-angiography.htm