Transcript display

11022 Transcutaneous Signal
Transmission for LVAD
February 18 , 2011
Yevgeniy Popovskiy, Vince Antonicelli, Craig LaMendola ,
Chrystal Andreozzi
Senior Design Review Agenda






Introduction
Design
Test Results
Successes
Challenges
Recommendations
Project Background
 The Left Ventricular Assist
Device (LVAD) is a electro
mechanical circulatory device
designed to assist a patient
with a failing heart. Typically,
a patient will receive one for
temporary use after a heart
attack or major heart surgery.
 Eliminate as many
transcutaneous wires as
possible running from the
external battery and
controller to the LVAD.
Customer Needs and Engineering
Specifications
THE SYSTEM NEEDS TO WORK!!!!
 Must Operate Reliably
 The device must be reliable
 The number of wires needs to for 6 hours
 Cable Size Reduced to 3be reduced
4mm
 The cable diameter needs to
 Improve Cable Flexibility
be reduced
by 200%
 The cable needs to be more
flexible
Big Picture Design
External Case
“Big
Black
Box”
ICs
Internal Case
Skin
ICs
Motor
Controller
Amplifiers
LVAD
2
Electronics Function
1
SA
The Big
Black Box
Sensors
SKIN
3
MCC + MCT
Motor Controller
Amplifiers
PAAS=>PADS
Test Results




Electronics Functionality Test
Leak and Pressure Test
Drop Test
Flexibility Testing
Electronics Functionality Test
Outside PWBA
SA Signals In (Bottom)and Out(Top
from Set Up On Bread Board
Inside PWBA
MCC Data from PWBA
Drop Test
 Both cases were drop tested with
boards inside
 Cases sealed with o rings
 Boards mounted with thermally
conductive foam
 External case had neoprene cover
installed
 Both cases dropped 3 times from 1
meter height
 No damage observed to cases or
electronics
Leak and Pressure Test
 Both cases were sealed only with o ring cords
 Silicone sealant not used for testing
 Sections of actual cables installed in cord grips
 Cases were sealed, tested, and examined three times
 Tested under .75 meters of water for 90 minutes
 Tested under running water for 15 minutes
 Cases confirmed water tight under pressure
Flexibility Testing
Cable
Current
Cable
Designed
Cable
Cable
Diameter
8 mm
3.5 mm
Number of
Wires
~40
10
Flexibility
(N/cm)
1.43271
0.43831
•310% Increase in Flexibility
•Cable diameter is 3.7 mm
Challenges





Time restraint on Debug Electrical System
Timely Coordination of information exchange
Major design changes from concept to finial design
Communication
Coordinating with the other team
Successes
 Cases easily past testing requirements
 Cable diameter was reduced and flexibility increased
 Successfully utilized breadboard as a cost efficient
prototyping tool
 Got breadboard to function properly
Recommendations
 Combining all electronics used in project 11022 and
project 11021
 Reduce physical size of internal and external
electronics by combining all internal electronic
components into one compact design
 Use the same tool form the simulation and finial
electronics layout (example PADS)