One Leaflet or Two?
Download
Report
Transcript One Leaflet or Two?
Seán Hendley
Cardiac Technician
Mater Private Hospital
Initial Presentation
63 year old female smoker (20/day) presented to G.P. with
respiratory tract infection.
Medical history included osteopoenia diagnosed in 2007,
old tuberculosis and more recently, influenza.
No surgical history noted.
Family history: Mother – osteoporosis
Brother – Lung cancer
S.O.A.P.
Subjective symptoms included general lack of energy,
dyspnoea on exertion, cough.
Objective findings as follows:
BP 132/89
Chest clear
Loud bruit over right renal angle
Plan of action: for specialist cardiology review
Regional General hospital
Patient attended her regional general hospital where
upon examination, a possible diagnosis of mitral
regurgitation and left ventricular hypertrophy were
queried.
Trans-thoracic echocardiogram and chest X-ray
ordered.
ECG
ECG
Abnormal
Sinus rhythm
Borderline left ventricular hypertrophy criteria
Poor R-wave progression
Chest X-Ray
PA & lateral views obtained
Bilateral apical pleural thickening and apical fibrosis due to old
TB.
Lungs are hyper-inflated with changes of COPD & emphysema.
Lung markings generally increased on both sides.
No focal lung lesion to suggest pneumonic consolidation noted.
No pneumothorax detected
Heart size within normal limits
Lateral view shows hyperinflation of lungs with increased AP
diameter of the chest
Conclusion: COPD & emphysema. No pneumonia.
Consultant Physician’s thoughts
? Radiation of murmur to upper abdomen
Murmur described as Loud++ , 4/6.
? Serious cardiac lesion
Further echo, TOE, Cardiac catheterisation under care
of invasive cardiologist
TTE PLAX
PLAX Valve Open
PLAX Valve Closed
Mitral Leaflet Tip M-Mode
Colour M-Mode
PSAX at MV level
PSAX at MV level
Apical 4 chamber
Mitral valve CW
PSAX Pap-muscle
TOE
Official Echo Report
Left ventricle normal in size with normal systolic function.
Both atria appear normal in size.
There appears to be only a single mitral valve leaflet,
represented by a thickened anterior mitral leaflet.
No posterior mitral leaflet is visualised.
Despite this anatomic variant, the mitral valve is competent
with only trivial regurgitation seen.
Tri-leaflet aortic valve, with trivial, central aortic regurgitation.
Dilation of coronary sinuses with an AP diameter of 4cm.
Plus 1 TR with estimated right ventricular systolic pressure of 3035mmHg.
Future Plan
Sinus rhythm; no further action warranted.
Should she have any extra systoles, aspirin
recommended.
Plan a re-echo in 1 year’s time.
Patient feels her dyspnoea was related to urti and is
much improved.
To wrap up….
Congenital anomalies of the mitral valve apparatus are rare.
Of such cases, congenital mitral stenosis, atresia, accessory valvular
tissue, and cleft mitral valve are more common.
Descriptions of functionally uni-leaflet mitral valves, either partial or
complete leaflet agenesis/hypoplasia are extremely rare and largely
limited to a few case reports.
In the most severe form (complete leaflet absence,) cases are usually
considered to be incompatible with life beyond the neonatal period.
Asymptomatic patients, however, do exist.
The prognosis in these asymptomatic patients is uncertain. The
potential for worsening mitral regurgitation and hence potential
morbidity and mortality primarily as a consequence of annular
dilation, has also been put forward.
Therefore, long-term monitoring with serial echocardiography seems
most appropriate.