June 20 2011 - Siegel - AF Afl
Download
Report
Transcript June 20 2011 - Siegel - AF Afl
Atrial fibrillation and flutter:
Practical Management Tips
Internal Medicine Residency
Program Noon Conference 2011
Learning Goals
A brief discussion of supraventricular
tachycardia (SVT)
Review of AF and AFl physiology and
EKG differentiation
Management of atrial fibrillation (AF)
Management of atrial flutter (AFl)
Management of fib/flutter
Anticoagulation
Cardioversion
Rate control
Rhythm control
Ablation
Cardiothoracic surgery
But, first, a brief diversion
Definition of supraventricular
tachycardia (SVT)
Differentiating among types of SVT
Differentiating AF from AFl
Supraventricular tachycardia
Abbreviated SVT
“Supra” means “above”
Supraventricular tachycardia comes from
above the ventricles
DO NOT CONFUSE with NSVT (non-sustained
ventricular tachycardia)
(Essentially) all narrow-complex tachycardia
has a supraventricular origin
SVT possible sites of origin
Sinus node
Atria
Atrioventricular node
His bundle
Or some combination of the above
Supraventricular tachycardia
Sinus tachycardia
Multifocal atrial tachcyardia
Paroxysmal atrial tachycardia
AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT)
Atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT)
Atrial fibrillation
Atrial flutter
Rare types of SVT
Inappropriate sinus tachycardia (previously called
SNRT or SANRT)
Junctional ectopic tachycardia (JET) and paroxysmal
junctional reciprocating tachycardia (PJRT) -- mostly
seen in infants and children
Nonparoxysmal junctional tachycardia (NPJT) -- seen
in acute right coronary artery occlusion and digitalis
toxicity
Supraventricular tachycardia
A nonspecific term that technically refers to seven
separate diagnoses
When clinicians use the term “SVT,” they mean that it
is a narrow-complex tachycardia, and they cannot
specify which one
Do not use the term “SVT” if you have an actual
diagnosis
Do use “SVT” when the patient has “supraventricular
tachycardia, not otherwise specified”
Supraventricular tachycardia
Sinus tachycardia
Multifocal atrial tachcyardia
Paroxysmal atrial tachycardia
AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT)
AV reentrant tachycardia (AVRT)
Atrial fibrillation
Atrial flutter
When in doubt, use a vagal
maneuver
Adenosine 6mg IV push
-We don’t use enough adenosine!
-But must be done with proper monitoring
Valsalva maneuver
-Safe; usually ineffective
Carotid sinus massage
-In properly selected populations, complications
are rare
Carotid Sinus Massage
Contraindications
Carotid bruit
Prior stroke or transient ischemic attack,
unless imaging has shown no significant
carotid disease
Myocardial infarction in the previous six
months
History of serious cardiac arrhythmias
(VT, VF)
Vagal maneuvers
Diagnostic
-Usually you can learn which SVT it was by
doing a vagal maneuver
Therapeutic
-Vagal maneuvers can terminate AVRT and
AVNRT
Differentiating AF from AFl
AFl is a macroreentrant atrial rhythm with
a reentry circuit that involves a large area
of atrial myocardium
AF is caused by multiple wandering
wavelets, a hodgepodge of
microreentrant circuits, often located in
the pulmonary veins
Atrial flutter
Atrial flutter
P waves exhibit a “sawtooth” pattern
referred to as flutter waves or “F” waves
Atrial rate is typically 250-350 beats per
minute (bpm)
Atrial flutter, continued
Classically, atrial rate is 300 bpm with
2:1 AV conduction, leading to a heart
rate of 150 bpm
But focus on the atrial pattern when
diagnosing SVT--try to ignore the QRS
complexes, just looking at the P (or F)
waves at first
Atrial flutter (with 4:1 response)
Atrial flutter (with 2:1 response)
Atrial flutter (variable response)
Atrial flutter (and more)
Atrial fibrillation
Rapid and irregular atrial activity at a
rate of 350-600 impulses per minute
Usually irregularly irregular ventricular
response
There are no P waves
Sometimes the F waves are so fine, the
surface EKG cannot detect them
Atrial fibrillation
Atrial fibrillation
Atrial fibrillation terms
Paroxysmal
Persistent
Permanent
“Lone”
Atrial fibrillation terms, cont.
Paroxysmal
-episodes terminate spontaneously in less
than seven days
Persistent
-fails to terminate within seven days
Atrial fibrillation terms, cont.
Permanent
-AF lasts for more than one year, and
-Cardioversion has not been attempted or
has failed
“Lone”
-patients less than 60 years of age
without structural heart disease
Atrial fibrillation terms, cont.
This classification applies only when no
clear reversible cause of AF.
If AF is clearly due to heart surgery,
pericarditis, myocardial infarction,
hyperthyroidism, pulmonary embolism,
or other reversible causes, avoid this
classification system
Management of fib/flutter
Anticoagulation
Cardioversion
Rate control
Rhythm control
Ablation
Cardiothoracic surgery
Anticoagulation (AC)
Recommendations are essentially the
same for AF and AFl
First, assess if the patient is high risk for
cardioembolic stroke
Most patients with high risk should be
on AC if they ever were seen in AF or
AFl
High risk for cardioembolic
stroke
Rheumatic mitral stenosis
2
-Mitral valve area less than 2.0 cm
Prosthetic heart valves
Hyperthyroid (?)
-2006 ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines
recommend INR 2-3 in all patients until
euthyroid; ACCP does not comment on
this
CHADS2 score
For use in patients without the high risk
factors on the previous slide
There are other risk models, including
the CHADS2-VASc score
CHADS2 score
When can you stop AC?
If AF was due to a completely reversed
reversible cause, maybe you can stop
For AFl, you can never stop
After ablation you still can’t stop
If you had HF, and your EF returns to
normal, you still can’t stop
Paroxysmal has same risk as others
When to stop AC
Pretty much you have to develop a
contraindication to anticoagulation
before you stop it
Fall risk is a relative contraindication; it’s
rare that someone is falling so
frequently that it rises to the level of
contraindication
When to stop AC
Really, paroxysmal AF has same stroke
risk as other AF
Caution when diagnosing AF! If you
misdiagnosed NSR with PAC’s or
multifocal atrial tachycardia as AF, you
can doom someone to lifelong AC
When to bridge with heparin
If patient has any evidence of
hypercoagulable state
If patient has prosthetic heart valves
Otherwise, risk of intracranial bleeding
and HIT outweighs benefit of reduced
stroke risk and warfarin skin necrosis
Risk of stroke per day off AC
Less than 4 events per 100 personyears prevented
One day is 4/100/365=0.0011% per day
stroke risk reduction
Efficacy and safety of anticoagulant treatment in acute
cardioembolic stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized
controlled trials. Paciaroni M, Agnelli G, Micheli S,
Caso VS. Stroke. 2007;38(2):423.
What about asa+clopidogrel?
Active-A continued—bleeding
Take-home point
Warfarin>ASA+clopidogrel>ASA
This applies to stroke prevention
And to bleeding risk
Every AF patient who is off warfarin
should be on aspirin unless there is a
contraindication to ASA therapy
Clopidogrel + Warfarin = Bleed
ASA+warfarin and ASA+clopidogrel
are relatively safe in most situations
where both are indicated
Warfarin+clopidogrel has a relative risk
of bleeding >3 times greater than
warfarin alone
ASA+warfarin+clopidogrel has less
rigorous data; evidence suggests >5
times greater than asa+clopidogrel alone
Dabigatran and Apixaban
Oral anticoagulant medications that do
not require monitoring
Dabigatran approved for AC in AF/AFl in
USA; NYS Medicaid and NBHN do not
pay for it. Medicare part D does pay
Apixaban likely similar; not yet approved
You’re the night intern
78 W with HTN, DM, COPD, and history
of paroxysmal AF
Nurse pages you to say that HR is now
172 beats per minute after albuterol
You ask, “what’s the blood pressure?”
The nurse says she will check. You go
to the bedside.
You’re the night intern
HR=172 irregular, BP is 72/48
Pt. is pale, diaphoretic, lethargic but
responds to questions
You confirm with EKG that the rhythm is
atrial fibrillation
Put patient in Trendelenberg position to
optimize cerebral perfusion, then you…
Single best answer: Next step
A) DC cardioversion without sedation
B) Ativan 2mg IV over 30 seconds, then
direct current (DC) cardioversion
C) Amiodarone 150mg IV over 15 min.
D) Diltiazem 10mg IV over 2 minutes
E) Adenosine 6mg IV push
Single best answer: Next step
A) DC cardioversion without sedation
B) Ativan 2mg IV over 30 seconds, then
direct current (DC) cardioversion
C) Amiodarone 150mg IV over 15 min.
D) Diltiazem 10mg IV over 2 minutes
E) Adenosine 6mg IV push
Management of fib/flutter
Anticoagulation
Cardioversion
Rate control
Rhythm control
Ablation
Cardiothoracic surgery
Indications for cardioversion
Hemodynamically unstable patient with
any (non-sinus) tachycardia with RVR
Cardiovert first; page cardiology second
When people are awake, sedate before
cardioversion
(You learned this in ACLS)
Cardioversion when
hemodynamically stable
Has never been shown to improve
prognosis or reduce embolic risk,
despite rigorous evaluation of this
question in AFFIRM and RACE
Still, “every patient deserves a trial of
sinus rhythm”
Cardioversion when
hemodynamically stable
AFl is hard to rate control and easy to
cardiovert
Heart failure (HF) may improve with
restoration of atrial “kick” from
cardioversion
Particularly important in severe diastolic
HF, also beneficial in systolic HF
Cardioversion complication:
Cardioembolism
Mostly in patients who are not
anticogulated at time of cardioversion
Reduce risk by anticoagulating
beforehand for 3-4 weeks
If not on A/C for ~4 weeks prior, do TEE
-If no thrombus on transesophageal
echocardiogram, give heparin bolus,
then cardiovert
Cardioversion complication:
Cardioembolism
Continue anticoagulation for at least 4
weeks after cardioversion
If stroke risk is low enough, change
from warfarin to ASA (+/- clopidogrel)
What if someone in paroxysmal AF selfcardioverts in front of you? Do they
need 4 weeks of warfarin? If they selfcardiovert at home, will anyone know?
Cardioversion complications
ST-T changes, CK, troponin
Myocardial stunning
Transient hypotension
Pulmonary edema
Skin burns/Self-injury
Ventricular fibrillation (not if SYNC on)
-Much more common in digitalis toxicity
DC Cardioversion, fine points
Usually should be done with one pad on
front and one on patient’s back
Optimal current level to use in first
shock is not known; lower in AFl
Biphasic is more successful than
monophasic in terminating arrhythmias
Turn on the SYNC function
DC Cardioversion, fine points
If first attempt fails, try increasing the
current to 200 joules
Then try changing the pad position
Then try pretreatment with
antiarrhythmic drugs
-might require long-term drug treatment
Still, about 1/3 of DC cardioversion
efforts will fail
Chemical cardioversion
Usually with ibutilide
Restricted to Cardiology use
Lower cardioversion success rate than
electrical, but more comfortable (no
sedation needed)
Caution in long QT
Amiodarone IV is not cardioversion
Cardioversion take-home
When hemodynamically unstable,
cardiovert immediately (with sedation if
awake patient)
Consider doing with AC and TEE in
other scenarios, especially newly
diagnosed AF/AFl, AFl difficult to rate
control, and HF—needs cardiology
supervision
Management of fib/flutter
Anticoagulation
Cardioversion
Rate control
Rhythm control
Ablation
Cardiothoracic surgery
Rate control
Keep the patient in the arrhythmia
Simply slows down the rate
Beta blockers (β-B)
Calcium Channel Blockers (CCB)
Digoxin
Must continue anticoagulation
Rhythm control
Goal is to keep patient in sinus rhythm
First anticoagulate
Then load rhythm control medication
Then cardiovert (possibly with TEE)
Monitor for antiarrhythmic side effects
Can you stop AC in rhythm control?
Rhythm control: choice of agent
Amiodarone and dronedarone
-Side effects and safety monitoring are an
entire Up-to-Date article
Sotalol and dofetilide
-Less side effect burden but less effective
in maintaining sinus rhythm, requires
hospitalization for QT monitoring during
initiation, CKD is contraindication, needs
cardiology approval at JMC
AFFIRM trial
Compared morbidity and mortality in
patients randomly assigned to rate or
rhythm control strategy
In the rhythm control strategy, patients
were allowed to stop A/C if serial Holter
studies showed no AF
Wyse DG, Waldo AL, DiMarco JP, Domanski MJ, Rosenberg Y,
Schron EB, Kellen JC, Greene HL, Mickel MC, Dalquist JE, Corley
SD. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with
atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2002 Dec 5;347(23):1825-33.
AFFIRM, continued
The question was: Which is better, rate
control or rhythm control?
The answer was: Anticoagulation.
In both treatment arms, anyone with a
subtherapeutic INR for any reason had
higher stroke risk
Serial Holter did not predict stroke risk
Rhythm control had more side effects
Management of fib/flutter
Anticoagulation
Cardioversion
Rate control
Rhythm control
Ablation
Cardiothoracic surgery
Atrial flutter ablation
Takes about 30 minutes
Success rate >80%
Technically straightforward
Main complication is AF after
Should probably be offered to anyone
who ever had AFl and has a good
prognosis, unless they also had AF
Atrial flutter
Atrial fibrillation ablation
Also called pulmonary vein isolation
Can last more than six hours
Requires atrial septal puncture and
heparinization
Atrial fibrillation ablation
Main post-procedural complication is a
special type of atrial tachycardia
No evidence that it’s safe to stop
anticoagulation afterward
Often requires repeat ablation
procedure to maintain sinus rhythm
Ablate and pace
Insert a biventricular pacemaker
Ablate the AV node (on purpose)
Very high procedural success rate
But leaves the patient lifelong
pacemaker dependent
Most useful in heart failure, particularly
tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy
Also in pacemaker-dependent patients
Management of fib/flutter
Anticoagulation
Cardioversion
Rate control
Rhythm control
Ablation
Cardiothoracic surgery
Surgical options
MAZE procedure
-Routinely done during mitral valve
surgeries; often done other times
LA appendage ligation
Percutaneous left atrial appendage
occlusion (PLAATO) and others
MAZE
PLAATO
PLAATO
Very cool; effectiveness studies of this
and competing devices are underway
Learning Goals
A brief discussion of supraventricular
tachycardia (SVT)
Review of AF and AFl physiology and
EKG differentiation
Management of atrial fibrillation (AF)
Management of atrial flutter (AFl)
Conclusion
Anticoagulation, when indicated, is the most
important treatment in most patients with
AF/AFl; mostly warfarin/dabigatran
Stronger AC has less stroke but more bleed
Cardiovert your hemodynamically unstable
patients right away
Rate control for most patients
Call cardiology for cardioversion, rhythm
control, ablation, or surgery if appropriate
Thank you
Insert humorous cartoon or scenic
image on this slide