Transcript Document
NCEA A Beginners Guide Chris Archer, National Facilitator Secondary Music Some material adapted from Kay Hawk’s keynote address given at the National Secondary Schools Qualifications Conference at Massey University, 19/20 July 2004. NCEA is: Our national schools’ qualification Standards-based assessment Fully implemented Not yet fully reviewed and revised One part of the national assessment strategy Why the Change to NCEA? Dual assessment system Little cohesion between Yrs 11 - 13 Ranked percentage marks did not describe full scope of student performance Built in failure - norm referenced Small pool of national assessors Low levels of student engagement in assessment dialogue Formal examinations place students in unfamiliar assessment environments Why the Change to NCEA? More detailed information needed by employers National curriculum statements not reflected in examination prescriptions or qualifications Need for flexible course design and delivery to meet needs of students Recognise and value teachers’ professionalism - planning and assessing Unit standards - perceived lack of credibility Summary: Need for a unified qualification system for secondary schools eliminate divide between examination awards and NQF qualifications ensure both externally and internally assessed achievements are reported Need to: cater for increasing diversity of community/economy needs in terms of qualifications ensure as many students as possible have access to credible, usable qualifications What are the mechanics of NCEA? Standards based assessment Three levels Achievement and Unit Standards New exchange system - credits from internal and external assessment 80 credits per level gains certificate 60 credits at level of certificate Maximum 24 credits available per subject per level Each student receives ROL in Jan The Structure of a Standard Subject Reference Music 1.1 Title Perform contrasting music as a featured soloist Level 1 Subfield Music Domain Making Music Registration Date Credits 6 Assessment Internal 7 Nov 2003 This achievement standard involves the performance of contrasting music by a featured soloist. The performer may be an unaccompanied or accompanied soloist, or in a small group. Achievement Criteria Achievement Perform generally accurate contrasting music, demonstrating some technical skills, appropriate musicianship and presentation skills. Explanatory Notes . . . Quality Assurance . . . Merit Perform fluent and mostly accurate contrasting music, demonstrating a range of technical skills, effective musicianship and presentation skills. Excellence Confidently perform fluent and highly accurate contrasting music, demonstrating a secure technical skills, convincing musicianship and communication skills. Internal vs External Internal Assessment 20% of internal standards in each subject area are externally moderated Schools have internal moderation systems in place - quality assurance A range of evidence can be gathered Students can be re-assessed Teachers create assessment activities or adapt MOE activities Teachers as assessors Internal vs External External Assessment Variety of assessment procedures - portfolio submissions - end of year written examinations Assessed by external markers NB: L1 and 2 Vis Arts have external verification system rigorous process in place for development of external exams MOE vs NZQA MOE responsible for: The achievement standards Teacher PD Resource development Standards review NZQA responsible for: Registration of standards on NQF External assessment External moderation Quality assurance Assessment practices underpinning NCEA: Assessment of learning (summative) and Assessment for learning (formative) Assessment of Learning Methods must be: Appropriate Fair Integrated with work or learning Manageable Assessment for Learning Is the process of seeking and interpreting evidence for use by learners and their teachers to decide where they need to go and how best to get there. Assessment for Learning Is assessment practice that sets students up with the tools they need to succeed rather than trying to catch them out on what they don’t know. Assessment for Learning Includes: Providing planning and assessment information early Having clear learning outcomes Making the relevance of these clear Ensuring the assessment tasks are appropriate Providing students with choices about content, context and how achievement is demonstrated Assessment for Learning Includes: Having full and clear criteria students can understand Using exemplars with the criteria Teaching students to self-assess Encouraging peer discussion (using criteria) but not evaluation Some issues are not new e.g. Some students will take two years to achieve Level One (School Certificate) The invalid use of league tables to compare schools The abuse by some schools of national systems and of students Problems with some exam papers NCEA has challenged: Curriculum experts to decide what standards and what constitutes them Reference to the curriculum levels What evidence schools need to keep Endorsement of NCEA: The PPTA Principals’ Council SPANZ The Universities ATOL facilitators in secondary schools ERO (onsite: N=25 schools; surveys: N=125 schools) NZCER “Learning Curves” second report (2004) Critics of NCEA: Individual writers/journalists Metro North and South Some boys’ schools Some independent and high decile schools Warwick Elley Critics have strong feelings: abysmal totalitarian cut-throat backstabbing smashed disaster bizarre brain death devastated counterfeit faddish theory nightmare Some criticisms are: Inaccurate Misleading Possible in theory but not a reality Based on concepts of learning that have little support Irrelevant to assessment Apply to all types of assessment Problems that can be fixed: We are over-assessing Some schools are not using the flexibility this system allows The number of credits has been overemphasised Parents and many contributing school teachers are not well informed We need to know what employers really think Some moderation issues The perceived inequality of unit and achievement standards Observations in the field: Student achievement data are being used to inform decisions An increase in confidence to make professional judgements There is some shift towards a wider range of assessment tasks Poor practice is being shown up Students can see progress more easily Some students are having achievement acknowledged for the first time Observations in the field: There is more clarity about learning outcomes Students are better informed about assessments and feel more ownership of the process Formative assessment practices have increased Programmes designed to meet student needs, interest and motivation Consideration given to student pathways - learning for life! Observations in the field: Clearer learning outcomes for Yr 9 and 10 and focused planning Effective networking and peer support Dissemination of information is greatly improved NCEA (more than any other initiative) has: Brought secondary assessment practice closer to that of the contributing schools Ensured all teachers are refreshed in their curriculum knowledge and assessment practice Provided detailed data for each subject area to make informed teaching decisions Resulted in more formative practice and less ‘testing’ NCEA (more than any other initiative) has: Involved students activity in their own learning and assessment Resulted in teachers working together more and in departments/ faculties being more organised Forced schools to set up sound systems and monitor them Provided for different student learning styles and needs The NCEA is not: The NCEA is: internationally recognised and respected for its ability to equally recognise and value all learning, whether leading toward vocational or tertiary focused pathways or a combination of both. now has a bi-culturally developed national qualifications system, where indigenous knowledge and skills, te reo Maori, & Maori learning contexts hold equal validity and value to all other learning and learning contexts. Many nations are understandably envious of such an outcome.