Presentation (Nottingham Padshe)

Download Report

Transcript Presentation (Nottingham Padshe)

Prospects for Higher Education
Newcastle-Nottingham Internet-PARs
Project Phase II Conference
Bahram Bekhradnia
13 November 2001
Our Research is among the best in the
world
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
U
ni
te
d
Ki
n
A u gdo
st m
Sw S rali
itz pa a
er i n
U
ni F lan
te ra d
d nc
G Sta e
er te
m s
A u an
st y
ria
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Au U K
st
ra
lia
Sw Sp
itz ain
er
la
n
Fr d
an
ce
U
G SA
er
m
an
Au y
st
ria
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
80
70
Papers per $ M
60
Papers per $ Million
50
Papers per
40per
Papers
researcher
researcher
30
Citations per $
Citations per $
20
Million
10
Million
0
The Government’s Vision for HE
• Widening Participation - 50% of under 30s by
2010
• World Class Research
• Working better with Industry and the
community
• Support excellent teaching
HE Achievements
• Young participation doubled
• Mature student numbers doubled
• One of the highest completion rates in the
world
• One of highest proportions of graduates in
the world
• Graduates among the most valued in the
world
Student Non-Completion
• 18 per cent, compared to 16 per cent in 1985/86
– meanwhile participation has more than doubled, and the student
profile has changed immensely
• This compares with:
Germany
28%
USA
37%
France
45%
Italy
66%
• The range in the UK is from 1% to 36%.
• NB our worst is better than most countries’ average.
NB International Comparators from OECD ‘Education at a Glance’
Graduates as a % of the Relevant
Population
Australia
Canada
Denmark
Germany
Italy
Japan
Netherlands
UK
USA
36%
32%
28%
18%
13%
23%
20%
34%
35%
NB International Comparators from OECD ‘Education at a Glance’
Graduate Employment:
UK vs Overseas Comparators
UK
% in Employment Three
Years after Graduation
94
Germany
91
Japan
86
France
86
Italy
68
Der Spiegel’s review of HE in Europe
‘Thanks to their excellent achievements the
British … occupy only the top places in the
table’
Participation in full-time education by 16-21 year olds
80
Percentage of age group
70
60
16 years
50
17 years
40
18 years
30
under 21 - HE
20
10
0
86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99
Year
Number of Mature students in HE 1984-93
Thousands
Number of mature students in higher education
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
84
85
86
87
88
89
Year
part-time
full-time
90
91
92
93
Number of mature students in HE 1996-2000
Number of mature students in higher education
Thousands
1,000
800
600
400
200
0
1996
1997
1998
1999
Year
part-time
full-time
2000
Drop Out and Previous Educational
Experience
All institutions
16%
14%
Non-continuation rate
12%
10%
All institutions
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
A-level points
20
22
24
26
28
30
Drop Out and Previous Educational
Experience (2)
Full-time first degree entrants (1997-98)
Non-continuation rates from first year of study
25%
20%
15%
young
10%
mature
5%
No
ne
Ot
he
r
el
3)
(le
v
3)
GN
VQ
BT
EC
( le
ve
l
Ac
ce
ss
01
el
1
Alev
011
Alev
el
2
621
el
2
Alev
Alev
el
3
027
0%
Widening Participation: Lessons
• We must widen the group of those benefiting
from HE
• Widening participation depends on success in
schools
• We have to help mature students enter HE
and succeed, but we will not widen
participation significantly if we rely on this
• Ensuring students succeed is as important as
bringing them in
HEFCE Strategy for Improving Learning &
Teaching
• Institutional Strand
– Funding to support Institutional Strategies
• Subject Strand
– LTSN
– FDTL, Etc
• Individual Strand
– ILT
– largely in the hands of institutions to recognise
individuals
– National teaching fellowships
Prospects for Higher Education
Newcastle-Nottingham Internet-PARs
Project Phase II Conference
Bahram Bekhradnia
13 November 2001