Transcript Slide 1

Tests, Backtracking, and
Recursion
Artificial Intelligence Programming in Prolog
Lecture 3
30/09/04
30/09/04
AIPP Lecture 3: Rules, Results, and Backtracking
1
Re-cap
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
A Prolog program consists of predicate definitions.
A predicate denotes a property or relationship between objects.
Definitions consist of clauses.
A clause has a head and a body (Rule) or just a head (Fact).
A head consists of a predicate name and arguments.
A clause body consists of a conjunction of terms.
Terms can be constants, variables, or compound terms.
We can set our program goals by typing a command that unifies
with a clause head.
• A goal unifies with clause heads in order (top down).
• Unification leads to the instantiation of variables to values.
• If any variables in the initial goal become instantiated this is
reported back to the user.
30/09/04
AIPP Lecture 3: Rules, Results, and Backtracking
2
Correction: Re-trying Goals
•
When a question is asked with a variable as an argument (e.g.
greet(Anybody).) we can ask the Prolog interpreter for multiple answers
using: ;
greet(hamish):- write(‘How are you doin, pal?’).
greet(amelia):- write(‘Awfully nice to see you!’).
| ?- greet(Anybody).
How are you doin, pal?
Anybody = hamish? ;
Awfully nice to see you!
Anybody = amelia? ;
no
•
•
; fails the last clause used and searches down the program for another that
matches.
It then performs all the tasks contained within the body of the new clause and
returns the new value of the variable.
30/09/04
AIPP Lecture 3: Rules, Results, and Backtracking
3
Tests
• When we ask Prolog a question we are asking for
the interpreter to prove that the statement is true.
?- 5 < 7, integer(bob).
yes = the statement can be proven.
no = the proof failed because either
– the statement does not hold, or
– the program is broken.
Error = there is a problem with the question or program.
*nothing* = the program is in an infinite loop.
• We can ask about:
– Properties of the database: mother(jane,alan).
– Built-in properties of individual objects: integer(bob).
– Absolute relationships between objects:
• Unification: =/2
• Arithmetic relationships: <, >, =<, >=, =:=, +, -, *, /
30/09/04
AIPP Lecture 3: Rules, Results, and Backtracking
4
Arithmetic Operators
• Operators for arithmetic and value comparisons are
built-in to Prolog
= always accessible / don’t need to be written
• Comparisons: <, >, =<, >=, =:= (equals), =\= (not equals)
= Infix operators: go between two terms.
=</2 is used
• 5 =< 7. (infix)
• =<(5,7). (prefix)  all infix operators can also be prefixed
• Equality is different from unification
=/2 checks if two terms unify
=:=/2 compares the arithmetic value of two expressions
?- X=Y.
yes
30/09/04
?- X=:=Y.
Instantiation error
?-X=4,Y=3, X+2 =:= Y+3.
X=4, Y=3? yes
AIPP Lecture 3: Rules, Results, and Backtracking
5
Arithmetic Operators (2)
• Arithmetic Operators: +, -, *, /
= Infix operators but can also be used as prefix.
– Need to use is/2 to access result of the arithmetic
expression otherwise it is treated as a term:
|?- X = 5+4.
X = 5+4 ?
yes
(Can X unify with 5+4?)
|?- X is 5+4.
X = 9 ?
yes
(What is the result of 5+4?)
• Mathematical precedence is preserved: /, *, before +,• Can make compound sums using round brackets
– Impose new precedence
– Inner-most brackets first
30/09/04
| ?- X is (5+4)*2.
5+4*2.
X = 13
18 ?
yes
AIPP Lecture 3: Rules, Results, and Backtracking
6
Tests within clauses
•
These operators can be used within the body of a
clause:
– To manipulate values,
sum(X,Y,Sum):Sum is X+Y.
–
To distinguish between clauses of a predicate definition
bigger(N,M):N < M, write(‘The bigger number is ‘), write(M).
bigger(N,M):N > M, write(‘The bigger number is ‘), write(N).
bigger(N,M):N =:= M, write(‘Numbers are the same‘).
30/09/04
AIPP Lecture 3: Rules, Results, and Backtracking
7
Backtracking
|?- bigger(5,4).
bigger(N,M):N < M,
write(‘The bigger number is ‘), write(M).
bigger(N,M):N > M,
write(‘The bigger number is ‘), write(N).
bigger(N,M):N =:= M,
write(‘Numbers are the same‘).
30/09/04
AIPP Lecture 3: Rules, Results, and Backtracking
8
Backtracking
|?- bigger(5,4).
Backtrack
bigger(5,4):5 < 4,  fails
write(‘The bigger number is ‘), write(M).
bigger(N,M):N > M,
write(‘The bigger number is ‘), write(N).
bigger(N,M):N =:= M,
write(‘Numbers are the same‘).
30/09/04
AIPP Lecture 3: Rules, Results, and Backtracking
9
Backtracking
|?- bigger(5,4).
bigger(N,M):N < M,
write(‘The bigger number is ‘), write(M).
bigger(5,4):5 > 4,
write(‘The bigger number is ‘), write(N).
bigger(N,M):N =:= M,
write(‘Numbers are the same‘).
30/09/04
AIPP Lecture 3: Rules, Results, and Backtracking
10
Backtracking
|?- bigger(5,4).
bigger(N,M):N < M,
write(‘The bigger number is ‘), write(M).
bigger(5,4):5 > 4,  succeeds, go on with body.
write(‘The bigger number is ‘), write(5).
The bigger number is 5
yes
|?-
30/09/04
Reaches full-stop
= clause succeeds
AIPP Lecture 3: Rules, Results, and Backtracking
11
Backtracking
|?- bigger(5,5).
 If our query only matches the final clause
bigger(N,M):N < M,
write(‘The bigger number is ‘), write(M).
bigger(N,M):N > M,
write(‘The bigger number is ‘), write(N).
bigger(5,5):5 =:= 5,  Is already known as the first two clauses failed.
write(‘Numbers are the same‘).
30/09/04
AIPP Lecture 3: Rules, Results, and Backtracking
12
Backtracking
|?- bigger(5,5).
 If our query only matches the final clause
bigger(N,M):N < M,
write(‘The bigger number is ‘), write(M).
bigger(N,M):N > M,
write(‘The bigger number is ‘), write(N).
bigger(5,5): Satisfies the same conditions.
write(‘Numbers are the same‘).
Numbers are the same
yes
Clauses should be ordered according to specificity
Most specific at top
Universally applicable at bottom
30/09/04
AIPP Lecture 3: Rules, Results, and Backtracking
13
Reporting Answers
|?- bigger(5,4).
The bigger number is 5
yes
 Question is asked
 Answer is written to terminal
 Succeeds but answer is lost
• This is fine for checking what the code is doing but not for using
the proof.
|?- bigger(6,4), bigger(Answer,5).
Instantiation error!
• To report back answers we need to
– put an uninstantiated variable in the query,
– instantiate the answer to that variable when the query succeeds,
– pass the variable all the way back to the query.
30/09/04
AIPP Lecture 3: Rules, Results, and Backtracking
14
Passing Back Answers
• To report back answers we need to
1. put an uninstantiated variable in the query,
1
| ?- bigger(6,4,Answer),bigger(Answer,5,New_answer).
3
2
bigger(X,Y,Answer):- X>Y.
, Answer = X.
bigger(X,Y,Answer):- X=<Y.
, Answer = Y.
2. instantiate the answer to that variable when the query
succeeds,
3. pass the variable all the way back to the query.
30/09/04
AIPP Lecture 3: Rules, Results, and Backtracking
15
Head Unification
• To report back answers we need to
1. put an uninstantiated variable in the query,
1
| ?- bigger(6,4,Answer),bigger(Answer,5,New_answer).
2 3
bigger(X,Y,X):- X>Y.
bigger(X,Y,Y):- X=<Y.
Or, do steps 2 and 3 in one step by naming the variable in
the head of the clause the same as the correct answer.
= head unification
30/09/04
AIPP Lecture 3: Rules, Results, and Backtracking
16
Satisfying Subgoals
• Most rules contain calls to other predicates in their
body. These are known as Subgoals.
• These subgoals can match:
– facts,
– other rules, or
– the same rule = a recursive call
1) drinks(alan,beer).
2) likes(alan,coffee).
3) likes(heather,coffee).
4) likes(Person,Drink):drinks(Person,Drink).  a different subgoal
5) likes(Person,Somebody):likes(Person,Drink),
 recursive subgoals
likes(Somebody,Drink). 
30/09/04
AIPP Lecture 3: Rules, Results, and Backtracking
17
Representing Proof using Trees
•
To help us understand Prolog’s proof strategy we can
represent its behaviour using AND/OR trees.
1. Query is the top-most point (node) of the tree.
2. Tree grows downwards (looks more like roots!).
3. Each branch denotes a subgoal.
1.
The branch is labelled with the number of the matching clause and
2.
any variables instantiated when matching the clause head.
4. Each branch ends with either:
1. A successful match
2. A failed match
, or
3. Another subgoal.
|?- likes(alan,X).
,
2
X/coffee
1st solution
= “Alan likes coffee.”
X = coffee
30/09/04
AIPP Lecture 3: Rules, Results, and Backtracking
18
Representing Proof using Trees (2)
• Using the tree we can see what happens when we ask
for another match ( ; )
|?- likes(alan,X).
Backtracking
2
X/coffee
4
X = coffee
drinks(alan,X).
1st match is failed
and forgotten
1
X/beer
X = beer
2nd solution
= “Alan likes beer because Alan drinks beer.”
30/09/04
AIPP Lecture 3: Rules, Results, and Backtracking
19
Recursion using Trees
• When a predicate calls itself within its body we say
the clause is recursing
|?- likes(alan,X).
Conjoined subgoals
2
X/coffee
X = coffee
4
5
drinks(alan,X). likes(alan,Drink)
likes(Somebody,Drink)
1
X/beer
X/coffee 2
X = beer
X = coffee
30/09/04
AIPP Lecture 3: Rules, Results, and Backtracking
20
Recursion using Trees (2)
• When a predicate calls itself within its body we say
the clause is recursing
|?- likes(alan,X).
2
X/coffee
X = coffee
4
5
drinks(alan,X). likes(alan,coffee)
likes(Somebody,coffee)
1
X/beer
X/coffee 2
Somebody 2
/alan
X = beer
X = coffee
Somebody = alan
3rd solution = “Alan likes Alan because Alan likes coffee.”
30/09/04
AIPP Lecture 3: Rules, Results, and Backtracking
21
Recursion using Trees (3)
• When a predicate calls itself within its body we say
the clause is recursing
|?- likes(alan,X).
2
X/coffee
X = coffee
5
4
drinks(alan,X).
1
likes(alan,coffee)
X/beer
X/coffee
X = beer
4th
solution =
“Alan likes Heather
because Heather likes coffee.”
30/09/04
2
likes(Somebody,coffee)
Somebody
/alan
X = coffee
Somebody
= alan
AIPP Lecture 3: Rules, Results, and Backtracking
Somebody
3 / heather
2
Somebody
= heather
22
Infitite Recursive Loop
• If a recursive clause is called with an incorrect goal it will loop
as it can neither prove it
nor disprove it.
likes(Someb,coffee)
Somebody
= alan
2
3
5
likes(Someb,coffee)
2
Somebody
= heather
likes(coffee,coffee)
Someb = alan
likes(coffee,X)
likes(coffee,X2)
likes(coffee,X3)
30/09/04
likes(coffee,X)
likes(X,X2)
likes(X2,X3)
AIPP Lecture 3: Rules, Results, and Backtracking
23
The central ideas of Prolog
• SUCCESS/FAILURE
– any computation can “succeed'' or “fail'', and this is used as
a ‘test‘ mechanism.
• MATCHING
– any two data items can be compared for similarity, and values
can be bound to variables in order to allow a match to
succeed.
• SEARCHING
– the whole activity of the Prolog system is to search through
various options to find a combination that succeeds.
• Main search tools are backtracking and recursion
• BACKTRACKING
– when the system fails during its search, it returns to previous
choices to see if making a different choice would allow
success.
30/09/04
AIPP Lecture 3: Rules, Results, and Backtracking
24