Transcript i3 Innovation Fund Consortium Teacher Observation Pilot

Plus
Delta
Panelist -- charismatic, interesting,
engaging, inspirational to hear
educators w/such broad and
varied backgrounds, like the
variety of speakers (did not have to
listen to the same presenter)
More: APPR (breakdown),
evidence, evaluation process
Informative, organized, cohesive,
realistic, good pacing, handouts
Effective exercises; good group
work
Great info on CCLS
Less group work
Looking forward to meat &
potatoes
Humor always helpful!
The room is cold, diet soda
Exemplar
Grade
Level
Content Area
Standards
Time
Straw Man
Outline for an
Intense
Engagement
7
Addition and
subtraction of
rational numbers
7.NS.1,
7.NS.3
15
days
Monk’s Words
We Live By
MS
American History Constitution
RI.6-8.1-3,
2 days
5, & 6; W.68.2, 4 & 9)
Gettysburg
Address
HS
American History – RI.9-10.1;
Civil War
RI.9-10.4,
SL.9-10.1;
and L.910.4-6.
5 days
ELA
3 days
The Making of a MS
Scientist
RI.5.1-4 &
8; W.5.2, 4
& 9; SL.5.1;
L.5.4-6.
2
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Teaching Standards
Evidence-based observation techniques grounded in
research
Application & use of student growth percentile model & VA
model (30-2.2)
Application & use of the State-approved teacher or
principal rubric(s)
Application & use of any assessment tools
Application & use of State approved locally selected
measures
Use of the Statewide Instructional Reporting System
Methodology of how scores are generated/composite
scores
Considerations for evaluating ELLs & SWDs
3
Level
State
Assessments
Local
Measures
Other 60 Pts
Overall
Composite
Score
Ineffective
0-2
0-2
0-64
Developing
3-11
3-11
Effective
12-17
12-17
Score range
locally
determined
Highly
Effective
18-20
18-20
65-74
75-90
91-100
Number ranges to be negotiated according to
the Appeal.
4