Superposition Method
Download
Report
Transcript Superposition Method
ECE 221
Electric Circuit Analysis I
Chapter 12
Superposition
Herbert G. Mayer, PSU
Status 10/25/2015
1
Syllabus
Source
Goal
Remove CCS
Remove CVS
Currents Superimposed
Conclusion
Exercise
2
Source
First sample taken from [1], pages 122-124
3
Goal
Linear electrical systems allow superposition
of multiple sources: that is computing
separate electrical units for each source, then
adding them after individual computations
This does not apply with dependent sources!
Goal of the stepwise removal is the reduction
of complex to simpler problems, followed by
the addition of partial results
4
Goal
Linear system means, that all currents in
such a system are linear functions of
voltages
Or vice versa: Voltages are linear
functions of currents
But never functions of a different power
than 1, meaning a different exponent!
Finally, when all separate sources have
been considered and computed, the final
result can simply be added
(superimposed) from all partial results
5
Goal With Circuit C1
Goal in Circuit C1 below is to compute currents
i1, i2, i3, and i4
Step1: When first the CCS is removed, we
compute 4 sub-currents, i’1, i’2, i’3, and i’4, solely
created by the remaining CVS
Removal of a CCS requires the connectors to be left
open at former CCS; since the current through the CCS
is created by solely that CCS
Step2: The CCS is added again, and the CVS is
removed
Removal requires the CVS connectors to be shortcircuited; since voltage at its terminals is solely created
by that CVS
Then compute 4 sub-currents, i’’1, i’’2, i’’3, and i’’4, solely
created by the remaining CCS
In the end, superimpose all i’ and i’’, that means,
add them all up
6
To Remove CCS from C1
A Constant Current Source (CCS) provides invariant
current to a circuit
Regardless of the circuit loads
With varying loads, a CCS causes a different voltage
drop with its constant current
Regardless of other constant power sources, each
causing voltage drops or currents or both
Removing a CCS means, leaving the 2 CCS
terminals open
With open terminals no current flows, yet voltage
drop is certainly possible at the now open terminals,
regardless of other sources and circuit elements
7
To Remove CVS from C1
A Constant Voltage Source (CVS) provides invariant
voltage to a circuit
Regardless of the circuit loads
With varying loads, a CVS causes a different current
at that same, constant voltage
Regardless of other constant power sources, each
causing voltage drops or currents or both
Removing a CVS means, short-circuiting the 2 CVS
terminals
Then there is no voltage drop, yet a current flow is
possible at the now connected terminals, regardless
of other sources and circuit elements
8
Original Circuit C1
9
Removed CCS from C1
10
Removed CCS from C1
Once we know the Node Voltage across the 3 Ω
resistor, we can easily compute all partial currents i’
We name this voltage along the 3 Ω v1
We compute v1 via 2 methods: first using Ohms’
Law and Voltage Division; secondly using the Node
Voltage Method
v1 drops across the 3 Ω resistor, but also across the
series of the 2 Ω + 4 Ω resistors
The equivalent resistance Req of 3 Ω parallel to the
series of ( 2 Ω + 4 Ω ) is = 2 Ω
Try it: 3 // ( 2+4 ) = 3 // 6 = 3*6 / ( 3+6) = 18 / 9 = 2 Ω
11
Removed CCS, v1 Via Voltage Division
Req
= 2Ω
v1
v1
= 120 * 2 / ( 2 + 6 )
= 120 * 1/4 = 30 V
12
Removed CCS, v1 Via Node Voltage
v1/3 + (v1-120)/6 + v1/(2+4) = 0 // *6
2*v1 + v1+ v1 = 120
4*v1
= 120
v1 = 120/4
v1
= 30 V
13
Removed CCS, Compute Currents i’
i’1
= (120 - v1) / 6
i’1
= 90 / 6
i’1
= 15 A
i’2
= v1 / 3
i’2
= 10 A
i’3
= v1 / 6
i’3
= 5 A
i’4
= i’3
i’4
= 5 A
14
Removed CVS from C1
15
Removed CVS from C1
Now we compute the node voltages in the
two nodes 1 and 2 via two methods:
First via Ohm’s Law
Then using the Node Voltage Method
Both nodes have 3 currents, which later we
compute using the Node Voltage method
We name the voltage drop at the 3 Ω
resistor v3
And the voltage drop at the 4 Ω resistor v4
16
Removed CVS from C1, Use Ohm’s
At node 1:
6 || 3 = 2 Ω
At node 2:
2 + 2= 4 Ω
4 || 4 = 2 Ω
yields:
v4 = -2 * 12 = -24 V
v3 = v4 / 2 = -12 V
17
Removed CVS from C1, Use Node Voltage
At node 1:
v3/3 + (v3-v4)/2 + v3/6 = 0
At node 2:
v4/4 + (v4-v3)/2 + 12
= 0
v4 * ( 1/4 + 1/2 )
= -12 + v3/2
v4 = 2*v3/3 - 16
yields:
v3 = -12 V
v4 = -24 V
18
Partial Currents Superimposed
i”1
= -v3/6= 12/6
=
2A
i”2
= v3/3
i”3
= (v3-v4)/2
=
i”4
= v4/4
= -6 A
i1
= i’1+i”1 = 15+2
i2
= i’2+i”2 = 10+-4=
i3
= i’3+i”3 = 5+6
= 11 A
i4
= i’4+i”4 = 5-6
= -1 A
= -12/3= -4 A
= -24/4
19
6A
= 17 A
6A
Conclusion
Superposition allows breaking a complex
problem into multiple smaller problems that
are simpler each
Applicable only in linear systems
Resistive circuits are linear!
The same principle also applies to circuits
with capacitances and inductances
But not to circuits that contain dependent
power sources, Op Amps, etc.
20
Exercise
Use superposition in the circuit below to
compute the currents in the 3 resistors
First short-circuit only the 7 V CVS, and
compute currents i1’, i2’, and i4’
There is no i3
Then short-circuit only the 28 V CVS, and
compute currents i1’’, i2’’, and i4’’
Finally superimpose the two reduced circuits
to add up i1, i2, and i4
But consider the opposite current directions
for: i1’ vs. i1’’, and for i4’ vs. i4’’
Not used for i2 !! Those 2 currents add up!
21
Exercise: Original Circuit
22
Exercise: Remove 7 V CVS
23
Exercise: Remove 7 V CVS
With the 7 V CVS removed, the equivalent
resistance of the 3 resistors is:
1 Ω || 2 Ω + 4 Ω = 2/3 + 4 = 14 / 3 Ω
Hence i4’ = 28 / ( 14 / 3 ) = 6 A
Current-division of 6 A in the 1 Ω and 2 Ω
results in i2’ = 2 A, and i1’ = 4 A
24
Exercise: Remove 28 V CVS
25
Exercise: Remove 28 V CVS
With the 28 V CVS removed, the equivalent
resistance of the 3 resistors is:
1 Ω + 2 Ω || 4 Ω = 4/3 + 1 = 7 / 3 Ω
Hence i1’’ = 7 / ( 3 / 3 ) = 3 A
Current-division of 3 A in the 2 Ω and 4 Ω
results in i4’’ = 1 A, and i2’’ = 2 A
26
Exercise: Final Result
i1 = i1’ - i1’’
i1 = 1 A
= 4A-3A
i2 = i2’ + i2’’
i2 = 4 A
= 2A+2A
i4 = i4’ - i4’’
i4 = 5 A
= 6A-1A
27