Measuring and Improving Design Capability
Download
Report
Transcript Measuring and Improving Design Capability
EDP - 2001 CONFERENCE
Session 7: Analog and Analog-mixed-signal (A/AMS) Design Flows
Current Analog Design Methodologies and Practices
Bill Guthrie
Numetrics Management Systems, Inc.
April 10, 2001
Page 1
Investigating Analog & Mixed-Signal Design Practices
What is the definition of an analog or mixed-signal chip?
How do AMS chip design projects compare to SoC design
projects?
What is the AMS content of an SoC design?
Are AMS blocks increasing in size?
Is AMS design productivity increasing?
Data from Numetrics’ Design Productivity Management System
database is used to investigate these issues.
Page 2
DPMS Database Used in This Investigation
Design Projects Accumulated in the DPMS Database
400
368 Projects
No. of Designs
350
As of 27-Mar-01
300
250
ASIC Projects
200
150
100
ASSP Projects
50
0
1998
1999
2000
Data Capture Date
Page 3
Companies Represented in the DPMS Database
Page 4
Characteristics Used to Define & Select AMS
Projects in the DPMS Database
Projects are included if one of the following criteria is met
• Analog circuitry contains ≥ 1,000 transistors
• RF circuitry is used
• Analog or Mixed-Signal circuitry comprises more than 10% of all
transistors
• BiCMOS or Bipolar process is used
• Large geometry process is used (≥ 0.6 micron)
• Only 1 metal layer is used
Projects are excluded if one of the following criteria is met
• Design style is “Gate Array” or “Embedded Array”
• No Analog, Mixed-Signal, or RF circuitry is used
• Small geometry process is used (≤ 0.25 micron)
• High layer count metal system is used (≥ 5 layers)
Page 5
Comparison of AMS and SoC Projects
CYCLE TIME
TEAM SIZE
12.7
SoC
49%
51%
73
Weeks
1st Tape-out
4.5
AMS
39%
61%
54
Weeks
SoC
AMS
SIZE, REUSE & COST
SoC:
4.9M Transistors
$2.5M Development Cost
New
Circuitry
41%
Physical
Reuse
35%
Logical
Reuse
24%
New
Circuitry Physical
33%
Reuse
45%
Logical
Reuse
22%
Projects were started in 1998 or later. Sample size is 112 projects.
AMS:
330K Transistors
$780K Development Cost
Page 6
AMS Content in SOC Designs
SoC BREAKDOWN BY CIRCUIT TYPE
AVERAGE SoC BLOCK COUNT
Analog & Mixed-Signal
0.5%
Analog
Logic &
Datapath
21.7%
0.86
DSP & Comm
Average Number
of Blocks: 12.50
1.49
Memory
2.10
Mixed Signal
Memory
77.8%
2.60
Interface
2.65
CPU & Control
2.81
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
Number of Functional Blocks
Average Size = 4,900,000 Transistors
AMS Content = 24,000 Transistors
Based on 72 designs started in 1998 or later
Page 7
AMS Block Size Growth is Due to Reuse
AMS Block Size & Effort
4,210
4,200
1,172
2,400
708
2,396
1,178
2,330
538
48%
50%
Frequency
Transistor Count
Total Reuse per AMS Block
40%
30%
20%
19%
11%
10%
6%
680
0%
2%
1997-1998
1999-2000
Effort = 16.3
Effort = 13.6
(Person-weeks)
(Person-weeks)
0%
13%
0%
1%
121- 41- 61- 81- 100%
20% 40% 60% 80% 99%
Percentage of Circuitry Reused
(Projects started 1999-2000)
New Circuitry
Logical Reuse
Physical Reuse
Based on sample of 400 AMS blocks
Page 8
AMS Block Design Productivity Trend
Transistors per Person-week
3,000
2,630
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
677
500
80
0
19971998
165
19992000
19971998
Productivity does not include adjustments for circuit complexity or effort
for chip-level or project-level development tasks.
19992000
Page 9
Conclusions
AMS Projects are substantially smaller in scope than SoC projects
• 25% shorter cycle times
• 65% smaller teams
• 69% lower development cost
SoC designs contain miniscule amounts of AMS circuitry on a
percentage transistor basis, but on a block-count basis AMS
represents over one-fourth of the design.
AMS blocks have grown in size by 33% per year, but all the
growth is due to reused circuitry.
The productivity of raw AMS transistor design has increased
• 33% per year for NEW AMS circuitry
• 97% per year for REUSED AMS circuitry
• REUSED AMS circuits require only 6% of
NEW AMS circuit design effort
Page 10