Hearst Recreation Center - Cleveland Park Citizens Association
Download
Report
Transcript Hearst Recreation Center - Cleveland Park Citizens Association
Hearst Recreation Center
ANC3F01 Commissioner David Dickinson
Cleveland Park Citizen Association Presentation
February 2, 2017
Outline
• Terminology – Contacts
• Scope of Project - Details
• History
• Survey Results
• Known Concerns
• Considerations
Terminology, Contacts, More info
• Department of General Services (DGS), Jackie Stanley, [email protected]
* Hearst Park and Pool Improvement Project - https://dgs.dc.gov/node/1135096
• Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR), Peter Nohrden, [email protected]
• David Dickinson, ANC Commissioner (includes Hearst Park), [email protected]
• Architect: Cox, Graae & Spack: http://cgsarchitects.com/
• Friends of Hearst Pool - http://friendsofhearstpool.org/
• Neighbors of Hearst Park - http://www.neighborsforhearst.org/
• Friends of Hearst Park (no longer functions) - http://hearstpark.org/
• Northwest Current, Forest Hills Connection, Cleveland Park and Tenleytown Listservs
Defined Scope of Project
• From DGS website:
The project will include design and construction including, but
not limited to, new playground area, new tennis courts,
renovation or replacement of existing soccer fields, new pool
and pool house, ADA renovations to site, storm water
management, remediation of site drainage, runoff, erosion
issues, landscaping, fencing, site furnishings amenities, signage,
and hardscaping. Adjacent to Hearst School.
DGS Design Start date (Park and Pool) – April 2016; Design
Completion Date – Winter 2016; Construction Start date Park - Winter 2017; Construction Completion date – Park –
Fall 2017; Construction Start Date -Pool – Fall 2018;
Construction Completion Date – Pool Spring 2019; Design
Architect: Cox Graae + Spack Architects; General Contractor:
TBD; Budget: Park - $8 Million in FY15-FY17; Pool - $5 Million in
FY19
History
• Hearst Elementary Renovation and Expansion (including new publicly accessible gym) – 2013-2015
• Friends of Hearst Park (FOHP) Survey - 2014
• October 2014 Northwest Current, List Serves
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Public Presentation of FOHP Survey Results to DGS/DPR – Early 2015
2015 Council Appropriation Process
DGS/DPR Community Meetings/Charrettes – May, June, September 2016
ANC3F resolution re Hydrology
Neighbor of Hearst Park Request(s) for alternative pool sites – Fall 2016
DGS/DPR Survey – November 2016
December 2016 – Sidwell purchases Washington Home on 37th/Upton
DPR Presentation of Survey Results to ANC3F – January 2017
DGS/DPR Presentation of Survey Results/Next Steps to Community – Hearst Elementary Gym, February 15,
2017 – 6:30 pm
ANC3F Hydrology Resolution – September 2016
• That DPR and DGS formally invite DOEE and any other applicable city agency to
participate in the design phase of the design phase for the Hearst Recreation Center Park
and Pool Project;
• That DPR, DGS and DOEE immediately undertake or contract for a hydrology and geologic
study to determine the movement, distribution, and quality of ground and storm water
around and from the Hearst Recreation Center Park and Pool Project site, the available
options to remediating the environmental and property damage that arises or may arise
from this ground and storm water, and the effect of this hydrology and geology on the
feasibility and environmental impacts of available options for renovating Hearst Park;
• That DPR and DGS not make any determinations regarding renovation of Hearst Park
until the results of this study are complete and communicated to the public.
Survey Results
• Pool
• DGS/DPR – 72 % favor, 22.5 % against
• Option 2
• Athletic Field
• Turf – 34 %, Natural Turf 66 % - not clear on turf/grass combo
• Amenities – Design and Green features
• Concerns
Considerations
• Recommendation to form design team of local experts
• Year round use of expanded pool house/community rooms if pool is
installed – other uses of pool area
• Soccer field is primarily used Sept-mid Nov and mid March – May, other
uses, turf and grass
• Create broader sense of community within the park, natural community
gathering spots – walkable/sustainable
• Maintain balance between recreational amenities while preserving sense
of buffer, trees, and other environmental concerns
• Maintaining patience in a system of many players and roles, many steps,
and varying perspectives