Transcript Force main

Metropolitan Council
Public Information Meeting
Hopkins – St. Louis Park – Minneapolis
Regional Sanitary Sewer Improvements
Draft Facility Plan
January 20, 2010





Bill Moeller – MCES Assistant General Manager
Bill Cook – MCES Engineering Services Manager
Scott Dentz – MCES Interceptor Engineering
Manager
Adam Gordon – MCES Project Manager
Tim O’Donnell – MCES Senior Information
Coordinator
Bill Lueck – Project Manager, CDM consulting
engineers
 Jodi Polzin – Project Manager, CDM consulting
engineers

1. Overview of Regional Wastewater System
2. Overview of Project Facility Plan
 Existing Facilities and Conditions
 Alternatives
 Recommendations and Schedule
 Public Participation
3. Question & Answer/Open House
Anoka
Washington
Hennepin
St. Croix
Valley
Ramsey
Metro
Blue
Lake
Seneca
Carver
Eagles
Point
Hastings
Empire
Scott
Dakota





Conveyance – Facilities used to move wastewater (includes
pumps, pipes and sewers)
Force main – A pressure pipe in which wastewater is conveyed
with the use of pumps (pump station)
Gravity sewer – A pipe that is constructed with a continuous
drop in elevation to convey flow
Temporary conveyance – A temporary wastewater conveyance
pipe typically run above ground and permits the existing pipe
to be drained, cleaned, inspected, and repaired
Interceptor – A force main or gravity sewer that intercepts
wastewater from multiple communities and conveys it to one
of the regional wastewater treatment plants.



Increase pumping station capacity to
accommodate growth and improve
efficiency
Correct known problems
Construct redundant facilities to allow
condition assessment and repair

MCES L27 Pump Station
◦ Constructed in 1971
◦ Receives all wastewater generated in Hopkins

MCES 7026 Sanitary Force Main
◦ Five mile long force main between L27 and 27th
Street and Humboldt Avenue South in Minneapolis

City Pump Stations
◦ Three pump stations serving nearly 20% of St. Louis
Park
◦ One pump station serving an area near Lake of the
Isles in Minneapolis
Current
Average, mgd
Ultimate
Peak, mgd
Average, mgd
Peak, mgd
Hopkins
(L-27)
1.6
4.6
2.3
6.3
St. Louis Park
(LS1, LS19, LS2)
1.0
3.2
1.4
4.2
0.01
0.04
0.01
0.04
2.6
7.0
3.7
9.3
Minneapolis
(L-5)
Total


The L-27 lift station has reached its useful
life expectancy and maintenance issues in
conjunction with the need to increase its
capacity warrant consideration of
replacement.
Age, operating
conditions, unknown
pipe condition, and
previous repairs warrant
improvements to
force main 7026.
Facility Plan Goals




Recommend Interceptor Sewer Corridor
Identify Type of Interceptor Sewer Facilities
(Pumping/Gravity)
Evaluate Alternative Sites for Pump Station
Location
Develop a Plan for Interceptor Sewer
Construction
3) To 1-MN-341 via Force Main
 Insufficient Capacity
 Not Considered Further
2) To 1-MN-344 via Force Main
Third Highest Cost
To Blue Lake WWTP
1-MN-344
1) To Blue Lake WWTP via Force Main
Second Highest Cost
Capacity Reserved for Existing Service Area
5) To 1-MN-330 via Force Main
Lowest Cost
Least Disruption
No Redirection of Local
Connections
4) To 1-MN-330 via Gravity
Highest Cost
Most Disruption
Most Difficult Construction
No Redirection of Local
Connections
To Blue Lake WWTP
1-MN-344
Alternative
Phase 1
Phase 2
1
Rehabilitate existing force
main w/ temporary
conveyance
Construct parallel, redundant
force main
2
Construct parallel,
redundant force main w/
temporary conveyance
Rehabilitate existing force main
3
Construct dual pipe force
main w/ temporary
conveyance
Abandon existing force main





Provide short term assurance that the
interceptor system is providing reliable service
Replace previously
repaired sections of
force main
Relocate inaccessible
force main
Reline remaining
force main
Install a redundant
force main
New Force Main
Install New
Force Main
Rehabilitated
Force Main
Abandoned
Force Main
Abandon
Force Main
Reline
Remaining
Force Main
New Force Main
Existing Force
Main



Cost Effective
Available Property
Site Compatibility
◦ Land Use
◦ Adjacent Land Use

Environmental Issues
◦ Flood Plain and Wetland Proximity
◦ Environmental Contamination


Recreational Impact
Transportation Disruption



Lowest Cost for Full Replacement Options
Existing Infrastructure Conveys Hopkins
Wastewater to this Location
MCES Currently Owns and Operates Existing
Site as a Pump Station
City Suggested Site For L-27
Head House
Wet Well
Tunnel
Project Construction Schedule
2010
2010-2011
Minnehaha Creek
2010-2012
Minneapolis –
Phase 1
2011-2014
L-27
Reconstruction
2011-2015
Hopkins/Saint Louis
Park – Phase 1
2011-2015
Highway 100 –
Phase 1&2
As Required
Hopkins/Saint Louis
Park – Phase 2
As Required
Minneapolis –
Phase 2
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016 through 2020
Lift Station/Force Main Segment
Capital Cost
L-27
$9,700,000
West Saint Louis Park
Highway 100
$14,100,000
$4,700,000
East Saint Louis Park
$11,100,000
Minneapolis
$24,000,000
Total Estimated Cost
$63,600,000
The estimated cost includes construction
cost, design and administration, land
acquisition, and contingencies.

Metropolitan Council projects are funded by
bonds and Public Facilities Authority Loans,
which are paid by regional sewer connection
fees & user charges.



One-time increase of $150.01 per unit for new
connection to sewer system (SAC)
$1.35 increase per year per household regionwide for 20 years (based on average annual water
usage)
No assessment by Metropolitan Council

Copies of Draft Facility Plan available for review









Hopkins City Hall
Hopkins Library
St. Louis Park City Hall
St. Louis Park Library
Kenwood Community Center
Metropolitan Council’s Data Center
Three Public Information Meetings
Public Hearing
Comments will be incorporated into the Final
Facility Plan.
Facility Plan Schedule




Written comments
02/08/2010
due no later than
Full Metropolitan Council
02/24/2010
Approval
Submit Facility Plan to MPCA
03/01/2010
MPCA Public Notice of EAW to follow
Facility Plan Approval
Public Comments


Submit comments no later than February 8, 2010.
Submit comments to Tim O’Donnell, MCES Senior
Information Coordinator, by:
 Email comments to:
[email protected]
 Send written comments to: Tim O’Donnell at
Metropolitan Council Environmental Services,
390 Robert Street North, St. Paul, MN 55101
 Fax comments to Tim O’Donnell at 651-6021477
 Record comments on Metropolitan Council Public
Comment Line at 651-602-1500
 Send TTY comments to 651-291-0904