The Gupta Empire
Download
Report
Transcript The Gupta Empire
"In the history of the world there
have been thousands of kings and
emperors who called themselves
'their highnesses,' 'their
majesties,' and 'their exalted
majesties' and so on. They shone
for a brief moment, and as
quickly disappeared. But Ashoka
shines and shines brightly like a
bright star, even unto this day."
H.G. Wells
Empires played a less prominent role in India
In the Indus River valley flourished the largest of
the First Civilizations (The cities of Harappa and
Mohenjo-Daro – urban planning)
But in the Indus valley, there was little evidence
of any central political authority
At its demise by 1500 BCE, creation of a new
civilization along the Ganges River
Scholars debate the role of the Aryans, a
pastoral Indo-European people, and whether
they invaded and destroyed or were already a
part of the Indus Valley population
By
600 BCE, the classical civilization of South
Asia began to take shape in northern India
But emerged as a fragmented collection of
towns and cities with diverse political
structures
And a range of ethnic, cultural, and linguistic
diversity due to endless variety of peoples
migrating from Central Asia across mountain
passes into India
The source of an identity in the midst of
diversity was a distinctive religion (Hinduism)
Linguistic Map
Northwestern
India had been briefly ruled by
Persian Empire
Northwestern India and been briefly
conquered by Alexander the Great
Persian and Greek influences encouraged the
first and largest of India’s short experiments
with empire building
“Surrender of Porus to the Emperor Alexander”
With
a population of perhaps 50 million
A large military force (reported 600,000
infantry soldiers - 30,000 cavalry - 8,000
chariots - and 9,000 elephants)
Civilian bureaucracy with various ministries
and spies
State also operated many industries –
spinning, weaving, mining, shipbuilding, and
armaments
Taxes on trade, herds, land (from which the
monarch claimed a quarter or more of the
crop)
Left
a record of his activities and thinking in
his edicts carved on rocks and pillars (Pillars
of Ashoka)
Reign began in a ruthless fashion of conquest
and expansion
But a particularly bloody battle, the Battle of
Kalinga, was a turning point
-Disgusted by the violence and carnage,
Ashoka converted to Buddhism
Adopted
a more peaceful approach to
government
Encouraged nonviolence and tolerance
Worked for the happiness and well-being of his
subjects
Abandoned the royal hunts
Ended animal sacrifices in the capital
Eliminated most meat from the royal menu
Generously supported Buddhist monasteries as
well as the building of stupas (shrines erected
by Buddhists which housed relics of important
Buddhists)
Ashoka’s law code
Written mostly in
Sanskrit, but one was in
Greek and Aramaic –
Cosmopolitan (diverse) empire
Buddhist principles dominate his laws.
Focus on: nonviolence, morality, &
religious toleration
Note the pillar on the left!
Ordered
the digging of wells, the planting of
shade trees, and the building of rest stops
along the empire’s major highways (integrating
the kingdom’s economy)
But still retained the power to punish
wrongdoing and the death penalty remained
Attempted to develop a moral code for the
diverse empire
After Ashoka’s death, political fragmentation
returned with competing regional states
Buddhist symbol - the Dharma wheel – representing
the teachings of the Buddha
Political Fragmentation
Another
short-lived experiment in empire
building in South Asia
A golden age of Hindu culture
Mathematicians developed the concept of
zero, the decimal system, and the concept of
infinity
Scientists experimented with vaccinations
Artists created beautiful paintings in the
caves of Ajanta and great works of literature
in Sanskrit, the holy language of the Hindu
religion
Gupta Rulers
Profitable trade of cotton &
pepper
Guptas were Hindu, not
Buddhists
Buddhism began to merge
back within Hinduism
(Buddha became just
another Hindu god)
Less centralized & smaller
than Mauryan
Theater State – Cultural
dominance
But
India was similar to Western Europe after
the collapse of the Roman Empire
Political fragmentation was more common
than unity
Perhaps India’s tremendous cultural diversity
was the reason
Also frequent invasions from Central Asia,
which regularly smashed states that might
have emerged as empire builders
And India’s social system known as the caste
system increased local loyalties
But
a vibrant economy encouraged trade and
commerce
India was a focal point of an extensive
network of trade in the Indian Ocean basin
Its cotton textile industry supplied cloth
throughout the Afro-Eurasian world
Strong guilds of merchants and artisans
provided political leadership in towns and
cities
Wealth from commerce patronized the
activities of artists and architects
Creativity in religious thinking (from Hinduism,
Buddhism and Jainism emerged)
Great advances in mathematics and science,
especially astronomy
The
absence of a consistent imperial unity did
not prevent the evolution of a lasting
civilization
The Decline of the
Guptas
Invasion by White Huns in the 500s =
end of the Gupta Golden Age
decline of Gupta empire - north India
broke into many separate Hindu
kingdoms ruled by rajputs (Hindu
princes)
Indian History is marked by a big
debate: Unity vs. Disunity
Questions:
Why
were centralized empires so much less
prominent in India than in China?
Compare and contrast the process of empire
building in India and the Roman Empire.
How did the religious experience shape the
political reality in South Asia?