Transcript Finland

Northern Dimension Antibiotic
Resistance Study
NoDARS
Prof Jaana Vuopio, M.D., Ph.D., PAC 11 side-event, 19 November 2015, Berlin, Germany
NoDARS project
•
Collaboration between 7 countries in Northern Europe
Finland, Norway, Sweden, Latvia, Poland, Germany and Russia
•
Focus on antibiotic resistance in society
•
Led by the NDPHS secretariat
•
Co-funded by the European
commission
(Contract reference 2014/344-660,
in total 430,000 EUR)
Project lead and partners
•
Lead partner: NDPHS secretariat, Sweden
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Sweden: The Public Health Agency of Sweden (Work package leader)
Finland: University of Turku
Russia: Smolensk State Medical Academy
Latvia: Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital
Norway: Norwegian Institute of Public Health
Poland: Institute of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health
Germany: Robert Koch Institute
Timeline
• Three year project (2014-2017)
Year one: Agreement and Setting-up of common study protocols (2015)
- 2 workshops in Stockholm with all partners
Year two: Recruitment of study subjects and collection of samples (2016)
Year three: Analysis and publication of results (2017)
Background
Traditionally AMR-surveillance is based on data on isolates from clinical infections
 Risk of bias in resistance levels
 Do we use too powerful antibiotics to treat common infections
such as uncomplicated UTIs?
Burden of antibiotic resistance in society/on population-level?
 Need for international cooperation and surveillance initiatives
Is there a link between AMR levels and national strategies towards containing AMR?
First study on AMR situation in the Northern Dimension Partnership
Purpose
To investigate antibiotic resistance levels in society of each participating
country by:
 studying antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria causing uncomplicated UTIs
in women
 studying asymptomatic stool carriage of ESBL-producing bacteria in
healthy individuals
To evaluate:
 current national guidelines for treatment of uncomplicated UTI’s
 AMR strategies in each participating country
Results will be used by health-care professionals, authorities and policy makers
to improve and facilitate their work on AMR
Investigation of resistance level in
uncomplicated urinary tract infections in women
One of the most common reasons for antibiotic prescription and
consumption, but bacterial cultures are not taken as routine in many
countries
• Focus on E. coli (ca 80 % of infections)
• Recruit study subjects from primary care
• Test susceptibility against panel of antibiotics
• Compare levels between countries
Estimate: Identify antibiotics that have <20%
resistance and compare to national treatment
recommendations
Investigation of stool carriage rates of ESBL, AmpC and
carbapenemase-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae
Recruitment of study subjects from three different groups of individuals:
• Students/Job seekers
• Primary-care patients
• Elective surgery patients
Same laboratory methods are used by each partner in the project
Estimate: Incidence of specific resistance
determinants in the healthy population
Sample collection
500 bacterial cultures from uncomplicated UTIs from each partner
country (in total 3500 samples):
 Antimicrobial susceptibility testing
 Questionnaire on risks factors known to connect to infections caused by
MDR strains
 Each country recruits and selects the study subjects based on their own
health care practices
250 fecal samples from each partner country (in total 1750 samples):
 Screen for ESBL-carriage
 Questionnaire on risk factors known to link to becoming a ESBL carrier
Outcome
 Better international cooperation: sharing of methods
and expertise
 Better understanding on antibiotic resistance in
society: indication if treatment guidelines overestimate
resistance levels
 New information on AMR to health-care professionals,
authorities and policy makers with comparable
methods
 Synergy with other ongoing global and regional AMR
surveillance initiatives
Expected impact of the actions
 lower the selective pressure on resistance as exerted
by antibiotic use and increase the appropriateness of
the treatment and actions taken
 a favourable effect on the development and spread of
antibiotic resistance
Thank you!
http://www.ndphs.org/enewsletter/NDPHS_e-Newsletter_2015_1.pdf
• http://www.ndphs.org/?database,view,project,1468