ETIOLOGY OF NGU
Download
Report
Transcript ETIOLOGY OF NGU
DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT
OF VAGINITIS
Stephanie N. Taylor, MD
LSUHSC Department of Medicine
Section of Infectious Diseases
DISCLOSURE
I have no financial interests or other
relationship with manufacturers of commercial
products, suppliers of commercial services, or
commercial supporters. My presentation will
not include any discussion of the unlabeled use
of a product or a product under investigational
use.
VAGINITIS
Inflammation of the vagina leading to
vaginal irritation and discharge
Both cervicitis and vaginitis can cause
vaginal discharge and distinction can be
difficult (Speculum Exam)
ETIOLOGY OF VAGINITIS
YEAST (CANDIDA SP.)
TRICHOMONAS VAGINALIS
BACTERIAL VAGINOSIS
ALLERGIC RXN, ESTROGEN DEF., etc.
VULVOVAGINAL CANDIDIASIS
Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, etc.
colonize vagina
Proliferation or allergic reaction caused
by known and unknown factors
(Antibiotic use, diabetes, pregnancy, etc.)
Estimated that >75% of women will have
at least one episode during lifetime
VULVOVAGINAL CANDIDIASIS
VVC causes 20-25% of vaginitis in STD
clinics
Not truly sexually transmitted - males
can acquire the organism however
(Candida balanitis or dermatitis)
VULVOVAGINAL CANDIDIASIS
Symptoms
Vulvar
pruritis, burning or pain
“External dysuria” - 20 to inflammed labia
Complaint
of discharge
Physical Examination
Vulvar
erythema, edema, fissures, vulvar
dermatitis with satellite lesions
Clumped, white, adherent discharge - classic
Occasionally scant, homogeneous, purulent
VULVOVAGINAL CANDIDIASIS
Diagnosis
KOH
Prep - Pseudohyphae in ~80%
Vaginal pH < 4.5, Negative amine odor,
absent or scant PMNs
Treatment
Fluconazole
150-200 mg po (single dose)
Any of several imidazole creams or
suppositories administered 3-7 days
Partner - imidazole cr. for dermatitis/balanitis
VAGINITIS
CANDIDA DERMATITIS
CANDIDA BALANITIS
TRICHOMONAS VAGINITIS
Caused by the unicellular parasite
Trichomonas vaginalis
Causes 5-15% of vaginitis in STD clinics
Sexually transmitted - (Older women delayed diagnosis of chronic infection)
Colonizes male urethra - mostly
asymptomatic but can cause NGU
TRICHOMONAS VAGINITIS
Symptoms
Increased
vaginal discharge, often profuse
Sometimes malodor
Vulvar irritation, pruritis
Physical Examination
Homogeneous
discharge, yellow, copious
Mucosal erythema, petechiael cervix
(strawberry cervix), bubbles in vaginal fluid
TRICHOMONAS VAGINITIS
Diagnosis
Motile
trichomonads and predominant
PMNs on saline wet prep
Vaginal pH > 5.0, Positive amine odor
Treatment
Metronidazole
2.0 gm (single dose)
Metronidazole 500 mg po bid for 7 days if
single dose fails
Partner - Eval. and Metro. 2.0 gm po (single dose)
TRICHOMONAS VAGINITIS
TRICHOMONAS VAGINALIS
WHAT IS BACTERIAL VAGINOSIS?
Most prevalent cause of vaginal symptoms in women of
childbearing age
Characterized by:
Increased malodorous discharge
Decrease or absence of Lactobacillus sp. (L. crispatus and
L. jensenii most common)
Overgrowth of Gardnerella vaginalis, Mycoplasma sp. and
other anaerobic organisms
Altered pattern of organic acids from these bacteria (e.g.,
putrescine, cadaverine, etc.) producing odor
Lack of inflammation – vaginosis (not vaginitis)
HISTORY OF BACTERIAL VAGINOSIS
1892 – Doderlein described normal vaginal
bacteria in pregnant women – Later
became known as Lactobacillus
1899 – Menge and Kronig isolated facultative
and strictly anaerobic bacteria, as well as
the Doderlein bacillus from the
vaginal bacteria of most women
Early Studies – Established the normal flora of women
– Lactobacillus sp. and a mixture of other organisms
HISTORY OF BACTERIAL VAGINOSIS
Early 1900’s – “Leukorrhea” – white discharge from
the vagina became focus of research
Initially thought to have come from the uterus
Treated by curettage of the endometrium
1913 – A. H. Curtis demonstrated the bacteria that
later became known as Gardnerella
1913 – Curtis also demonstrated:
a. The discharge was of vaginal origin, not
endometrial
b. Women with leukorrhea did not have many Dordelein
bacilli
c. Presence of anaerobic bacteria correlated with leukorrhea
HISTORY OF BACTERIAL VAGINOSIS
1920’s – R. Schroder reported 3 types of vaginal flora
1. Acid-producing rods – Doderlein’s bacilli – and
the least pathogenic flora
2. Mixed flora with Doderlein bacilli in the minority
3. Mixed vaginal flora with no Doderlein bacilli and
the most pathogenic flora
1950 – J.D. Weaver also noted the association of mixed
flora with BV
HISTORY OF BACTERIAL VAGINOSIS
1955 – Gardner and Dukes demonstrated that
Haemophilus vaginalis caused non-specific
vaginitis (Later named Gardnerella vaginalis)
1955 – Gardner and Dukes erroneously failed to find
association with mixed flora
For 25 years research focused on Gardnerella vaginalis
as the cause of BV and ignored the potential role of
other organisms.
WHAT’S IN A NAME?
Leukorrhea
Non-specific vaginitis
Haemophilus vaginalis vaginitis
Gardnerella vaginitis
Anaerobic vaginosis (but not just anaerobes)
Bacterial vaginosis (since inflammation is not a
feature of BV, the term vaginosis has replaced
vaginitis)
EPIDEMIOLOGY
Prevalence depends upon population studied
Student Health Clinics – 4-10%
Family Planning Clinics – 17-19%
Pregnant women – 16-29%
Infertility Clinics – 30%
STD Clinics – 24-40%
EPIDEMIOLOGY
Prevalence also depends on ethnicity
Large U.S. Study of pregnant women
13,747 at 23-26 weeks gestation
16.3% of women had BV
Asians – 6.1%
Caucasians – 8.8%
Hispanics – 15.9%
African American – 22.7%
51% of 4,718 women in Ugandan study
EPIDEMIOLOGY
BV is common in most populations
More common in STD clinics than in family
planning or prenatal clinics
More common in women with discharge
Related to ethnicity for unknown reasons
Especially common in Sub-Saharan Africa
WHAT ABOUT SEXUAL TRANSMISSION?
Conflicting and controversial area
Women who use condoms have decreased
prevalence of BV
Yet multiple partner treatment trials have
failed to demonstrate benefit to women with
BV
Evidence of sexual transmission of BV in
women who have sex with women
WHAT ABOUT SEXUAL TRANSMISSION?
Females with no sexual exposure have
significantly lower prevalence of BV
Some studies have found association with
younger age of sexual debut
In college women, Amsel demonstrated that 0
of 18 virgins versus 69 of 293 (24%) sexually
experienced women had BV
WHAT ABOUT SEXUAL TRANSMISSION?
Association with number of partners also seen
Women with new or multiple sex partners also
have higher prevalence of BV
Evidence of NGU in male partners of patients
with BV
WHAT ABOUT SEXUAL TRANSMISSION?
Sexual transmission of Gardnerella vaginalis has been
demonstrated
Gardner and Pheifer detected G. vaginalis in the
urethras of 79 and 86% of male sex partners of women
with BV but not in controls
Piot et al. developed a typing system and demonstrated
that Gardnerella isolates in women with BV and from the
urethras of their partners were the same
Ison and Easmon recovered G. vaginalis and other
anaerobes at 103 to 107 org/ml from semen in 16% of men
attending an infertility clinic
PREDISPOSING/RISK FACTORS
Douching
IUD as contraceptive method
Younger age
New sex partner
Multiple sex partners
PREDISPOSING/RISK FACTORS
Decrease or absence of Lactobacillus sp.
Non-white ethnicity
Smoking in some studies
Failure to use condoms
Female sexual partners
ETIOLOGY
BV represents a complex change in vaginal flora
Reduction in H2O2-producing lactobacilli
Increase prevalence and concentration of G. vaginalis,
M. hominis, and anaerobes such as Prevotella,
Bacteroides sp., Porphyromonas, Peptostreptococcus sp.,
etc.
These organisms found in low levels in normal vagina –
also argues against sexual transmission alone as cause
PATHOGENESIS
Decreased Lactobacilli – decreased lactic acid
causes increased pH
Overgrowth of anaerobes associated with
increased enzymes that breakdown vaginal
peptides into amines that are malodorous
Trimethylamine, cadaverine, putrescine, etc.
PATHOGENESIS
Amines – increase vaginal transudation and squamous
cell exfoliation causing the discharge
At elevated pH – G. vaginalis adheres to squamous cells
(“Clue cells”)
Amines also provide substrate for growth of M. hominis
PATHOGENESIS
Lactobacilli are essential for normal vaginal pH and
inhibit growth of other bacteria
Lactobacilli are also acidophilic and are attracted to an
acid environment
Anaerobic environment of BV is not conducive to
growth of lactobacilli or dominance
Remains unknown whether the loss of lactobacilli
occurs first or follows the flora disturbance
LACTOBACILLUS INTERACTIONS
Reduction in Lactobacilli –
Decreased H2O2 Production
Overgrowth of
BV-associated bacteria
Raised pH
CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS
“Fishy-smelling” discharge – More noticeable after
intercourse (Addition of semen with alkaline pH is similar to
addition of KOH)
Discharge is gray or off-white, thin, homogeneous, and
adherent to vaginal wall
No erythema or inflammation
Some patients report vaginal itching
Cervix usually normal
CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS
CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS
Bacterial vaginosis
Trichomonas vaginitis
DIAGNOSIS
Amsel’s Criteria (3 of 4 criteria for dx.)
Adherent,
homogeneous gray-white
discharge
Positive amine or whiff test with addition of
10% KOH
Elevated vaginal pH of >4.5
Presence of “clue cells” – Squamous cells
with adherent bacteria (>20% of cells on wet
mount)
DIAGNOSIS – GRAM STAIN
Bacterial Morphotype
Points Scored per Morphotype*
None 1+
2+
3+
4+
Large Gram-Positive Rod 4
3
2
1
0
Small Gram-neg/var. Rod
0
1
2
3
4
Curved Gm-neg/var. Rod
0
1
2
3
4
*Score 0-3 points – Normal
4-6 points – Intermediate
7-10 points – Bacterial Vaginosis
CLUE CELLS
COMPLICATIONS OF BV IN
PREGNANCY
7 studies have reported increased risk of preterm birth in women with BV
Relative risk from 2.0-6.9 directly attributable
to BV
~40% elevated risk of pre-term, low birth
weight delivery
16-29% of pregnant women with BV
Large number of women at risk
COMPLICATIONS OF BV IN
PREGNANCY
Considerable reduction in pre-term births in high risk
women treated for BV
Screening and treatment is currently recommended in
high-risk patients (previous pre-term delivery)
Similar results have not been seen in low-risk patients
with asymptomatic BV
Therefore routine screening and treatment of BV in all
asymptomatic pregnant women is not indicated
INFECTIOUS COMPLICATIONS OF BV
Organisms found in the lower genital tract in
women with BV are found in ~50% with
positive cultures of amniotic fluid or placenta
Greatly increased risk of postpartum
endometritis and post-Ceasarian endometritis
Increased rates of wound infections
INFECTIOUS COMPLICATIONS OF BV
Vaginal cuff cellulitis after hysterectomy
Post-abortion PID
Pre-operative antibiotic prophylaxis that
covers BV-associated flora can reduce these
complications
Since the 1970’s BV has also been associated
with PID, especially in the absence of GC or
CT
BV AND HIV ASSOCIATION
Presence of BV or absence of lactobacilli associated with
heterosexual transmission of HIV
2-fold increased prevalence of HIV in Thai and Ugandan
women with BV
Study of African pregnant and postnatal women in Malawi
found that women with BV were more likely to seroconvert
to HIV
These data raise the question of whether BV should be
treated more aggressively (In the past – asymptomatic BV
was not treated)
TREATMENT OF BV
Treatment
Metronidazole 500 mg po bid for 7 d
Metronidazole 2.0 gm no longer recommended
Metro. 0.75% gel qd or bid for 5 d
Clinda 2% Cr., 5 gm qd for 7 d
Clinda 300 mg po bid for 7d (Active against
Lactobacillus - interferes with re-establishment of
normal flora
Partner tx. - No treatment required
New Drug - Tinidazole 500 bid po x 5 days – 95%
efficacy/ Vaginally once daily – 80% eff.
SIDE EFFECTS OF TREATMENT
Overall in about 15% of patients
Nausea
Metallic taste
Headaches
Gastrointestinal complaints
Oral metronidazole assoc. with Disulfiram-like
or “antabuse” reaction after consumption of
alcohol – Patient education point
3-5% will stop therapy due to side-effects
RECURRENT BV
80-90% cure rates at 1 week
15-30% recur within 3 months
Single Dose versus 7 day course – 73% vs. 82%
Higher recurrence rates for single dose tx.
RECURRENT BV
Several trials have demonstrated that partner
treatment does not improve clinical outcome of
BV or reduce recurrence
Discrepancy between data suggesting sexual
transmission and lack of benefit with treatment
of male partners is puzzling
Excellent opportunities for further research
RECURRENT BV – COMBINED OR
ALTERNATIVE TREATMENTS
Replace
Lactobacilli
Oral or vag
Reduction in Lactobacilli –
Decreased H2O2 Production
Overgrowth of
BV-associated bacteria
Intermittent Tx.
Raised pH
Maintain
4.5 pH – vag. gel
RECURRENT BV – COMBINED OR
ALTERNATIVE TREATMENTS
Replacement or Restoration of Lactobacilli
(LB)(Bacteriotherapy)
Unfortunately lack of efficacy with few controlled
trials
LB used needs to be able to adhere and produce
H2O2
If given orally, LB needs to survive pass through GI
tract and ascend from the perianal area into the
vaginal area
Lactobacilli used have not been vaginal strains
RECURRENT BV – COMBINED OR
ALTERNATIVE TREATMENTS
Lactobacilli in yogurt strains do not bind to
vaginal epithelial cells
Only 1 of 14 women were cured after applying
yogurt intravaginally twice daily for 7 days
Little utility for therapies employing yogurt
RECURRENT BV – COMBINED OR
ALTERNATIVE TREATMENTS
Other types of capsules, powders, etc. in health food
stores are also dairy derived
In addition, 9 of 16 preparations were contaminated
with other types of bacteria and 5 of 16 did not contain
peroxide producing strains
Placebo-controlled trial of purified Lactobacillus
suppositories being studied by Sharon Hillier.
~50% of women improved during therapy
Only 4 of 29 remained free of BV at 2nd visit
RECURRENT BV – COMBINED OR
ALTERNATIVE TREATMENTS
Disinfectants
Chlorhexidine – 79% effective but 50% recurred at one month
Povidone-iodine – bid for 2 wks – only 20 % efficacy
Acidifiers
Lactic Acid suppository – 20% efficacy
Lactic acid gel x 7 days – 77% - 7 day follow-up – not repeated
5% acetic acid tampon – 38% efficacy
Suppressive therapy – Currently being studied (Sobel)
Metronidazole or Tinidazole twice a week
Results pending
WHAT CAN WE OFFER PATIENTS
WITH RECURRENT BV?
Clearly explain bacterial vaginosis
Carefully go through personal hygiene practices to
remove douching, etc. that may disrupt normal flora
Explain that course of therapy may relieve symptoms
but it takes time for the bacterial imbalance normalize
and recolonize with Lactobacilli
Longer course of antibiotics or combination therapy
for recurrences (2 weeks/ oral + vaginal therapy)
???Suppressive and alternative combination therapy in
the future