Transcript Objections

The Identity Theory of Mind
Hypothesis
Hypothesis

Pain is the firing of C-fibres
Hypothesis

Pain is the firing of C-fibres

lightning is an electrical discharge
Hypothesis

Pain is the firing of C-fibres


lightning is an electrical discharge
genes are segments of DNA
Justifications
Justifications

The world can be understood in purely physical terms
Justifications


The world can be understood in purely physical terms
Behaviourism won’t work for some mental events
Justifications



The world can be understood in purely physical terms
Behaviourism won’t work for some mental events
Brains and minds are related
Justifications




The world can be understood in purely physical terms
Behaviourism won’t work for some mental events
Brains and minds are related
Mental terms are defined by their causes and effects
Commentary
Commentary

Identity
Commentary

Identity

Not an identity of ‘meaning’
Commentary

Identity

Not an identity of ‘meaning’

Intension and extension
Commentary

Identity

Not an identity of ‘meaning’
Intension and extension
 Synthetic and analytic

Commentary

Identity

Not an identity of ‘meaning’
Intension and extension
 Synthetic and analytic
 A priori and a posteriori

Commentary

Types and tokens
Commentary

Types and tokens
Type
Commentary

Types and tokens
Type
Token
Commentary

Types and tokens

Token-token identity?
Commentary

Types and tokens

Token-token identity?
Any particular coloured thing is a shaped thing
Commentary

Types and tokens
Token-token identity?
Any particular coloured thing is a shaped thing
 Type-type identity?

Commentary

Types and tokens
Token-token identity?
Any particular coloured thing is a shaped thing
 Type-type identity?
Water is H2O

Objections
Objections

Location
Objections

Location
A pain in the foot isn’t in the brain
Objections

Location
A pain in the foot isn’t in the brain
Objections

Semantics
Objections

Semantics
Can brain processes be about things?
Objections

Semantics
Can brain processes be about things?
Objections

Semantics
Can brain processes be about things?
=
“pain”
Objections

Epistemological Problems
Objections

Epistemological Problems

Introspection
Objections

Epistemological Problems

Introspection
P1: I ‘know’ mental items are part of my
consciousness
Objections

Epistemological Problems

Introspection
P1: I ‘know’ mental items are part of my
consciousness
P2: I don’t ‘know’ that about brain processes
Objections

Epistemological Problems

Introspection
P1: I ‘know’ mental items are part of my
consciousness
P2: I don’t ‘know’ that about brain processes
-------------------------------------------------------------------C: Brain processes are not part of my consciousness
Objections

Epistemological Problems

Introspection
Objections

Epistemological Problems

Introspection
P1: John knows the morning star is Venus
Objections

Epistemological Problems

Introspection
P1: John knows the morning star is Venus
P2: John doesn’t know the evening star is Venus
Objections

Epistemological Problems

Introspection
P1: John knows the morning star is Venus
P2: John doesn’t know the evening star is Venus
-------------------------------------------------------------------C: The evening star is not the morning star
Objections

Epistemological Problems
Introspection
 Differential Knowledge

Objections

Phenomenological Problems
Objections

Phenomenological Problems
Can brain processes be ‘sharp’, ‘dull’, ‘throbbing’, …?
Objections

Chauvinism
Objections

Chauvinism
No creature without C-fibres can feel pain
Objections

Chauvinism
No creature without C-fibres can feel pain