Aquatic Fungi & Leaf Breakdown
Download
Report
Transcript Aquatic Fungi & Leaf Breakdown
Katie Seymore
Two different aquatic fungi
Leaf breakdown and fungi
Bacteria and fungi relationship
The essential role of leaf conditioning
Aquatic hyphomycetes and aero-aquatic fungi
Form-class fungi
Most Ascomycetes, fewer Basidiomycetes, one Oomycete
Secondarily adapted to aquatic life
Convergent evolution events
Similar ecological roles
Leaf breakdown
First described by Ingold
in the 1940’s
Produce and release spores
underwater
Mostly in streams-
moving, oxygenated water
Conidia
Described by Beverwijk 1950’s
Amphibious
Propagules trap air and float for dispersal
Mostly in temporary waters, low oxygen
Fall- conidia germinating
Winter/spring- grow
Summer- make propagules
Trap air
Hydrophobic
encrustation
Many different forms
Important ecological role
Release nutrients to aquatic ecosystems
Increase leaf’s N content
Lowers leaf mass
Amount of lignin (polymer in cells walls) content
controls how fast leaf decomposes
available carbon
Tannins amounts also big deal
(phenol compounds)
Overall generalists
Can specialize
Combined exoenxzymes of all fungi on a leaf help
speed breakdown
Linked mycelium
Two different leaves
Help by Sharing
Harm by sending incorrect cues to healthy mycelium
Bacteria are often talked about, but have only
a small role
Bacteria cannot penetrate leaf, only on outside
Fungi are 95% of microbial biomass
Fungi perform better without bacteria
Bacteria has little growth without the
presence of fungi
secondary compounds
Key links in the food web
Breakdown tough compounds in the leaves
Different leaves condition at different times
Make leaves suitable for detritivores, like
caddisflies
Caddisflies consume leaf parts
but really, the fungi in the leaf is more nutritious then
the leaf itself
Caddisflies taste test leaves
Will avoid unconditioned parts, eat only the best spots
Leaves can be over conditioned by fungi
Out of nutrients
Fungi dead
Mycotoxins
Instead of conditioning the leaf, some fungi make it
less palatable
Defense against getting eaten
Allochthonous material very important for aquatic food
webs
Organisms in vernal ponds have limited time to grow
before ponds dry out, so any increase in food quality
helps!
Fungi play a role in food availability throughout the year
with different conditioning times for different leaves
Two main forms of aquatic fungi
Awesome convergent evolution
Important for food supply in aquatic ecosystems
Key to nutrient release and detrital breakdown
http://www.botanik.univie.ac.at/mycology/images/Poster
Oslo.jpg
footage.shutterstock.com
http://ww2.coastal.edu/vgulis/conidia.htm
http://www.mycolog.com/chapter11b.htm
http://www.mycolog.com/chapter11b.htm
www.thinklongislandfirst.com
http://www.naturalheritage.state.pa.us/VernalPool_Ecolog
y.aspx
http://fungi.life.illinois.edu/about/mitosporic_fungi
http://super-marioworld.webnode.com.br/products/random-images-4/
Arsuffi T.L. and K. Suberkropp. 1984. Leaf Processing Capabilities of Aquatic Hyphomycetes:
Oikos, 42(2): 144-154.
Interspecific Differences and Influenceon Shredder Feeding Preferences.
Arsuffi T.L. and K. Suberkropp. 1985. Selective Feeding by Stream Caddisfly (Trichoptera)
Detritivores on Leaves with Fungal-Colonized Patches. Oikos, 45(1): 50-58.
Butler S.K. and K, Suberkropp. 1986. Aquatic Hyphomycetes on Oak Leaves: Comparison of
Growth, Degradation and Palatability. Mycologia, 78(6): 922-928.
Chung, N. and K. Suberkropp. 2009. Contribution of fungal biomass to the growth of the
Biology, 54: 2212–2224.
shredder, Pycnopsyche gentilis (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae). Freshwater
Cohen, J. S., S. Ng and N. Blossey. 2012. Quantity Counts: Amount of Litter Determines
46(1): 85–90.
Tadpole Performance in Experimental Microcosms. Journal of Herpetology
Duarte, S., C. Pascoal, F. Cássio and F. Bärlocher. 2006. Aquatic Hyphomycete Diversity and
658-666.
Identity Affect Leaf Litter Decomposition in Microcosms. Oecologia, 147(4):
Gessner M.O. and E. Chauvet.1994. Ecology Importance of Stream Microfungi in Controlling
Breakdown Rates of Leaf Litter., 75(6):1807-1817.
Golladay, S. W., J. R. Webster and E. F. Benfield. 1983. Factors Affecting Food Utilization by a
Ecology
6(2): 157-162
Leaf Shredding Aquatic Insect: Leaf Species and Conditioning Time. Holarctic
Gulis V. and K. Suberkropp. 2003. Effect of Inorganic Nutrients on Relative Contributions of
Microbial
Ecology, 45(1): 11-19.
Fungi and Bacteria to Carbon Flow from Submerged Decomposing Leaf Litter.
Hutchens, J. J., E.F. Benfield and J. R. Webster. 1997. Diet and Growth of a Leaf-shredding
Contrasting Disturbance History. Hydrobiologia 346: 193–201.
Caddisfly in Southern Appalachian Streams of
Inkley, M.D., S.A. Wissinger, and B.L. Baros. 2008. Effects of drying regime on microbial
Freshwater Biology 53: 435–445.
colonization and shredder preference in seasonal woodland wetlands.
Maerz, J.C., J. S. Cohen and B. Blossey. 2010. Does Detritus Quality Predict the Effect of Native
Biology 55:
1694–1704.
and Nonnative Plants on the Performance of Larval Amphibians? Freshwater
Markovskaja S. 2012. Aero-Aquatic fungi Colonizing Decaying leaves in woodland swampy
Pools of Aukstadvaris Regional Park (Lithuania). Botanica Lithuanica, 18(2): 123–132.
Premdas P. D. and B. Kendrick. 1991. Colonization of Autumn-Shed Leaves by Four AeroAquatic Fungi. Mycologia, 83(3): 317-321.